In this case study, we examined the effects of two instructional methods, Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) and Collaborative Reasoning (CR), on students’ written and oral arguments. Using an interview, we also explored students’ understanding of academic arguments and their perceptions about the instruction. The students were 38 middle school, African American students in a low-income urban school. The results signaled the potential benefit of both instructional approaches to enhance the written argument skills of low-income, urban, middle school students. In addition, students in both conditions reported an improved understanding of some features of academic argument, and they recognized the value of instruction in argument.
Anderson, R.C., Chinn, C., Waggoner, M., & Kim, N. ( 1998). Intellectually stimulating story discussions. In J. Osborn & F. Lehr (Eds.), Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 170-186). New York: Guilford.
2.
Anderson, R.C., Nyguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Kim, S., Reznitskaya, A., et al. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 1-46.
3.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. ( 1986). Observing interaction. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.
4.
Ball, A.F. ( 2006). Teaching writing in culturally diverse classrooms. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 293-310). New York: Guilford.
5.
Chambliss, M.J. ( 1995). Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. Reading Research Quarterly , 30, 778-807.
6.
Chambliss, M.J. ( 2001). Analyzing science textbooks materials to determine how "persuasive" they are. Theory Into Practice, 40, 255-264.
7.
Clark, A.M., Anderson, R.C., Kuo, L., Kim, I., Archodidou, A., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2003). Collaborative reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in school. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 181-198.
8.
Crammond, J.G. ( 1998). The uses and complexity of argument structures in expert and student persuasive writing. Written Communication, 15, 230-268.
9.
De La Paz, S. ( 1995). An analysis of the effects of dictation and planning instruction on the writing of students with learning disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
10.
De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. ( 1997). Effects of dictation and advanced planning instruction on the composing of students with writing and learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 203-222.
11.
De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. ( 2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 687-698.
12.
Delpit, L.D. ( 1986). Skills and other dilemmas of a progressive Black educator . Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280-298.
13.
Erftmier, T., & Dyson, A.H. ( 1986). "oh ppbbt!" Differences between the oral and written persuasive strategies of school-aged children. Discourse Processes , 9, 91-114.
14.
Felton, M. ( 2004). The development of discourse strategies in adolescent argumentation. Cognitive Development, 19, 35-52.
15.
Felton, M., & Kuhn, D. ( 1997). The development of argumentive discourse skill. Discourse Processes, 32, 135-153.
16.
Golder, C., & Coirier, P. ( 1994). Argumentative text writing: Developmental trends. Discourse Processes, 18, 187-210.
17.
Graff, G. ( 2003). Clueless in academe: How schooling obscures the life of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Graham, S. ( 1999). Handwriting and spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly , 82, 78-98.
19.
Graham, S. ( 2006). Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 457-478). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
20.
Graham, S., Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., & Whitaker, D. ( 1997). The role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 170-182.
21.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. ( 2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist , 35, 3-12.
22.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. ( 2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323-344). New York: Guilford.
23.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. ( 2005). Writing better: Effective strategies for teaching students with learning difficulties. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
24.
Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Mason, L.H. ( 2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development . Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 207-241.
25.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. ( 2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
26.
Harris, K.R., Graham, S., & Mason, L.H. ( 2006). Improving the writing, knowledge, and motivation of young struggling writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal , 43, 295-340.
27.
Hayes, J.R. ( 1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1-28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Knudson, R.E. ( 1994). An analysis of persuasive discourse: Learning how to take a stand. Discourse Processes, 18, 211-230.
29.
Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. ( 1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning . Cognition and Instruction, 15, 287-315.
30.
Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. ( 2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74, 1245-1260.
31.
Litchfield, A.B. ( 1984). Making room for uncle Joe. Niles, IL: Albert Whitman.
32.
MacArthur, C.A., Ferretti, R.P., & Okolo, C.M. ( 2002). On defending controversial viewpoints: Debates of sixth graders about the desirability of early 20th-centuryAmerican immigration. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 160-172.
33.
McCutchen, D., Covill, A., Hoyne, S.H., & Mildes, K. ( 1994). Individual differences in writing: Implications of translating fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 256-266.
34.
Munsch, R.N. ( 1990). The paper bag princess. London: Little Hippo.
35.
Olson, D.R. ( 1994). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Persky, H.R., Daane, M.C., & Jin, Y. ( 2003). The nation’s report card: Writing 2002 (No. NCES 2003-529). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Educational Sciences , National Center for Educational Statistics.
37.
Plummer, L. ( 1999). Bliss at the burger bar. In D. R. Gallo (Ed.), No easy answers: Short stories about teenagers making tough choices (pp. 27-42). New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Books for Young Readers.
38.
Reznitskaya, A., & Anderson, R.C. (2002). The argument scheme and learning to reason. In M. Pressley & C. Block (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 319-334). New York: Guilford.
39.
Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R.C., & Kuo, L. ( 2007). Teaching and learning argumentation. Elementary School Journal, 107, 449-472.
40.
Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R.C., McNurlen, B., Nyguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A., & Kim, S. ( 2001). Influence of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse Processes, 32, 155-175.
41.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
42.
Trueman, T. ( 2005). Fear. In N. E. Mercado (Ed.), Every man: Ten short stories about being a guy (pp. 133-139). New York: Dial Press.
43.
Waggoner, M., Chinn, C., Yi, H., & Anderson, R.C. (1995). Collaborative reasoning about stories. Language Arts, 72, 582-589.
44.
Yeh, S.S. ( 1998). Empowering education: Teaching argumentative writing to cultural minority middle-school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 33, 49-83.
