In this article, the authors discuss the context of urban special education and the complexities of meeting the demands of standards-based reform in urban settings. The study presented highlights the voices of urban special educators in two large urban school districts as they navigate meeting the demands of teaching students with disabilities, and share their perceptions of their roles and responsibilities as a result of No Child Left Behind Act. Findings reveal several implications for educational policy and areas of future research in teacher quality and workplace conditions for urban special educators.
Billingsley, B. ( 2004). Special education teacher retention and attrition. Journal of Special Education, 38, 39-55.
2.
Billingsley, B., Carlson, E., & Klein, S. ( 2004). The working conditions and induction support of early career special educators. Exceptional Children, 70, 333-347.
3.
Billingsley, B., & McLeskey, J. ( 2004). Critical issues in special education teacher supply and demand. The Journal of Special Education, 38(1), 2-4.
4.
Blanchett, W.L., Mumford, V., & Beachum, F. ( 2005). Urban school failure and disproportionality in a post-Brown era. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 70-81.
5.
Boe, E., Cook, L., Bobbin, S., & Terhanian, G. ( 1998). The shortage of fully certified teachers in special and general education. Teacher Education and Special Education , 21, 1-21.
6.
Booher-Jennings, J. ( 2006). Rationing education in an era of accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 756-761.
7.
Brownell, M.T., Hirsch, E., & Seo, S. ( 2004). Meeting the demand for highly qualified special teachers during severe shortages. Journal of Special Education, 38, 56-61.
8.
Cuban, L. ( 1989). The "at-risk" level and the problem of urban school reform . Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 780-801.
9.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Berry, B. ( 2006). Highly qualified teachers for all. Educational Leadership, 64(3), 14-20.
10.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Sclan, E. ( 1996). Who teaches and why. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 67-101). New York: Macmillan.
11.
Delpit, L. ( 1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press.
12.
Dieker, L.A., & Murawski, W.W. (2003). Co-teaching at the secondary levels: Unique issues, current trends, and suggestions for success. High School Journal, 86(4), 1-13.
13.
Fleischner, J. ( 1993). What is special about urban special education?Teacher Education and Special Education, 16(1), iv-v.
14.
Gordon, E. ( 2003). Urban education. Teachers College Record , 105, 189-207.
15.
Haberman, M., & Post, L. ( 1998). Teachers for multicultural schools: The power of selection . Theory Into Practice, 37, 96-105.
16.
Hardman, M.L., & Dawson, S. ( 2008). The impact of federal public policy on curriculum and instruction for students with disabilities in the general classroom. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 5-11.
17.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 1997, 20 U.S.C. §1400 etseq. (1997).
18.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 2004, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq. (2004).
19.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. (2004). Public Law 108-446, 108th Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
20.
Ingersoll, R.M. ( 2002). Out of field teaching, educational inequality, and the organization of schools: An exploratory analysis. Seattle : University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
21.
Keefe, E.B., & Moore, V. ( 2004). The challenge of co-teaching in inclusive classrooms at the high school level: What the teachers told us. American Secondary Education, 32(3), 77-88.
22.
Kozol, J. ( 1991). Savage inequalities: Children in American schools. New York: Harper.
23.
Luft, P. ( 2008). Examining educators of the deaf as "highly qualified" teachers: Roles and responsibilities under IDEA and NCLB. American Annals of the Deaf, 152, 429-440.
24.
McLaughlin, M.J., & Thurlow, M. ( 2003). Educational accountability and students with disabilities: Issues and challenges. Educational Policy, 17, 431-451.
25.
McLeskey, J., Tyler, N., & Flippin, S. ( 2003). The supply of and demand for special education teachers: A review of research regarding the nature of the chronic shortage in special education (COPSSE Document Number RS-1). Gainesville: University of Florida, Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education.
26.
McLeskey, J., Tyler, N., & Flippin, S. ( 2004). The supply of and demand for special education teachers: A review of research regarding the nature of the chronic shortage of special education teachers. Journal of Special Education, 38(1), 5-21.
27.
Miller, D., Brownell, M.T., & Smith, S. ( 1999). Factors that predict teachers staying in, leaving, or transferring from, the special education classroom. Exceptional Children, 65, 201-218.
28.
Florida Department of Education, Office of Evaluation and Reporting. (2005). Critical teacher shortage areas, 2006-2007 . Tallahassee, FL: Author.
29.
Nygreen, K. ( 2006). Reproducing or challenging power in the questions we ask and the methods we use: A framework for activist research in urban education . Urban Review, 39(1), 1-26.
30.
Pugach, M.C., & Seidl, B.L. ( 1995). From exclusion to inclusion in urban schools: A new case for teacher education reform. Education and Urban Society , 27, 379-396.
31.
Rosenberg, M., Sindelar. P., & Hardman, M. ( 2004). Preparing highly qualified teachers for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: The impact of NCLB and IDEA. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 266-278.
32.
Singh, K., & Billingsley, B.S. (1996). Intent to stay in teaching . Remedial and Special Education, 17, 37-47.
33.
Talbert-Johnson, C. ( 2006). Preparing highly qualified teachers for urban schools: The importance of dispositions. Education and Urban Society , 39, 147-160.
34.
Thornton, B., Peltier, G., & Medina, R. ( 2007). Reducing the special education teacher shortage. The Clearinghouse, 80, 233-238.
35.
Thurlow, M.L. ( 2000). Standards-based reform and students with disabilities: Reflections on a decade of change. Focus on Exceptional Children , 33(3), 1-15.
36.
Tyler, N., Yzquierdo, Z., Lopez-Reyna, N., & Flippin, S.S. ( 2004). Cultural and linguistic diversity and the special education workforce. Journal of Special Education, 38, 22-38.
37.
U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) data. Available from http://ideadata.org
38.
U.S. Department of Education. (2005). New no child left behind flexibility: Highly qualified teachers [Fact sheet] . Retrieved May 25, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/methods/teachers/hqtflexibility.html
39.
U.S. Department of Education. (2007). IDEA regulations: Alignment with the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. Retrieved March 2, 2009, http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/%2Croot%2Cdynamic%2CTopicalBrief%2C3%2C
40.
Voltz, D.L. ( 2000). Challenges and choices in urban teaching: The perspectives of general and special educators. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 4(1), 41-53.
41.
Voltz, D.L., & Fore, C. ( 2006). Urban special education in the context of standards-based reform. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 329-336.
42.
Weiss, M.P., & Lloyd, J.W. ( 2002). Congruence between roles and action of secondary special educators in co-taught and special education roles. Journal of Special Education, 36(2), 58-68.
43.
Wisniewski, L., & Gargiulo, R.M. (1997). Occupational stress and burnout among special educators: A review of literature. Journal of Special Education, 31, 325-346.
44.
Zhou, M. ( 2003). Urban education: Challenges in educating culturally diverse children. Teachers College Record, 105, 208-225.
