Book Review: Santa Ana,O. (2004). Tongue-Tied: The Lives of Multilingual Children in Public Education. Lanham,MD: Rowman & Littlefield

Crawford, J. (2004). No Child Left Behind: Misguided approach to school accountability for English language learners. Retrieved November 29, 2004, from http://www.nabe.org/documents/policy_legislation/NABE_on_NCLB.pdf

Felton, T.F. (1999). Comment: Sink or swim? The state of bilingual education in the wake of California Proposition 227. Catholic Law Review, 48, 843-870.

Gándara, P. , Rumberger, R. , Maxwell-Jolly, J. , & Callahan, R. (2003, October 7). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(36). Retrieved July 25, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n36/

Johnson, C. (1999). The California backlash against bilingual education: Valeria G. v. Wilson and Proposition 227. University of San Francisco Law Review, 34, 170-195.

MacSwan, J. (2000). The threshold hypothesis, semilingualism, and other contributions to a deficit view of linguistic minorities. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 22, 3-45.

Massey, D.S. (1995). The new immigration and ethnicity in the United States. Population and Development Review, 21, 631-652.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, §3001, 115 Stat. 1689 (2002). Proposition 227, Cal. Educ. Code 300 (West Supp. 1999).

Sekhon, N. (1999). A birthright rearticulated: The politics of bilingual education. New York University Law Review, 74, 1407-1450.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2001 (121st ed.) (No. 214. Students who are foreign born or who have foreign-born parents: 1999; Current Population Reports, P20-533). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.