As a part of a larger qualitative study, this research investigation explored the perceptions and attitudes that first-generation, urban college students have of their preparation for postsecondary education. The purposeful sample in this study was comprised of 13 first-generation college students (i.e., 6 males and 7 females) who were graduates of the same urban high school. The qualitative methodology was comprised of individual interviews and biographical questionnaires. The themes that emerged—surrounding the students' perceptions and attitudes of their preparation for postsecondary education—included (a) the preparation during high school that helped with college success and (b) the skills that were lacking for college success. Practical applications for educators (i.e., school counselors, teachers, administrators, and postsecondary educators) are included.
ACT. (2004). Crisis at the core: Preparing all students for college and work (Rep.). Iowa City, IA: Author.
2.
ACT. (2005). Courses count: Preparing students for postsecondary success (Rep.). Iowa City, IA : Author.
3.
Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
4.
Bragg, D.D., Kim, E., & Rubin, M.B. (2005). Academic pathways to college: Policies and practices of the fifty states to reach underserved students [Abstract]. Retrieved July 3, 2006, from http://www.apass.uiuc.edu/publications/ASHE2005%20APASS%20paper.pdf
5.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509-536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Choy, S. (2001). Students whose parents did not go to college: Postsecondary access, persistence, and attainment (National Center for Education Statistics Rep. No. NCES 2001-126). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
7.
Engle, J., Bermeo, A., & O'Brien, C. (2006). Straight from the source: What works for first-generation college students (Rep.)Washington, DC: Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education.
8.
Gibbons, M.M., & Shoffner, M.F. (2004). Prospective first-generation college students: Meeting their needs through social cognitive career theory . Professional School Counselor, 8, 91-97.
9.
Haycock, K., & Huang, S. (2001). Are today's high school graduates ready? Thinking K-16,5, 3-22. Retrieved July 8, 2006, from http://www.2.edtrust.org/NR/rdonlyres/85897615-327E-4269-939A-4E14B96861BB/0/k16_winter01.pdf
10.
Horn, L., & Nevill, S. (2006). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary education institutions: 2003-04: With a special analysis of community college students (Rep. No. NCES 2006-184). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics .
11.
KnowledgeWorks Foundation. (2007). High school initiatives: The Ohio high school transformation initiative: Why you should care. Retrieved April 12, 2007, from http://www.kwfdn.org/high_schools/ohsti/why/
12.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
Lotkowski, V.A., Robbins, S.B., & Noeth, R.J. (2004). The role of academic and non-academic factors in improving college retention (Rep.). Iowa City, IA: ACT.
14.
Martinez, M., & Klopott, S. (2005). The link between high school reform and college access and success for low-income and minority youth. Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum and Pathways to College Network. Retrieved July 3, 2006, from http://www.aypf.org/publications/HSReformCollegeAccessandSuccess
15.
Noeth, R.J., & Wimberly, G.L. (2002). Creating seamless educational transitions for urban African American and Hispanic students (Rep.). Iowa City, IA: ACT.
16.
Pascarella, E.T., Pierson, C.T., Wolniak, G.C., & Terenzini, P.T. (2004). First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. Journal of Higher Education, 75, 249-284.
Reid, M.J. (2007). First-generation urban college students speaking out about their secondary school preparation for postsecondary education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University .
19.
Robinson, S., Stempel, A., & McCree, I. (2005). Gaining traction, gaining ground: How some high schools accelerate learning for struggling students (Rep.). Washington, DC: The Education Trust.
20.
Roderick, M. (2006). Closing the aspirations—attainment gap: Implications for high school reform (Rep.). New York: MDRC.
21.
Ryan, G.W., & Bernard, H.R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 769-802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Trusty, J. (2004). Effects of students' middle-school and high-school experiences on completion of the bachelor's degree [Monograph]. Center for School Counseling Outcome Research, 1, 1-46.
23.
Valadez, J.R. (1998). Applying to college: Race, class, and gender differences . Professional School Counseling, 1, 14-21.
24.
Warburton, E.C., Bugarin, R., & Nunez, A.M. (2001). Bridging the gap: Academic preparation and postsecondary success of first-generation students (Rep. No. NCES 2001-153). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
25.
White, M.J., & Glick, J.E. (2000). Generation status, social capital, and the routes out of high school. Sociological Forum, 15, 671-691.
26.
Wimberly, G.L., & Noeth, R.J. (2004). Schools involving parents in early postsecondary planning: ACT policy report (Rep.). Iowa City, IA: ACT.
