America’s urban high schools are having trouble making sophomores, resulting in freshmen classes bulging with students repeating a grade. Research shows that these students are at high risk of failure and dropout. Urban districts have begun to respond to the notable “freshmen bulge” through school restructuring. This mixed-methods study examines first steps taken by one urban high school in Ohio to address the challenges of high levels of freshmen failure through a small schools model. The authors discuss freshman student, parent, and teacher reactions to a pilot program designed expressly for the making of sophomores.
The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (1998). Kids count data book. Baltimore: Author.
2.
Beldon, R., & Stewart. (2004). Ohioans consider the state of their high schools and efforts to improve high school. Columbus: Ohio Department of Education.
3.
Black, S. (2004). The pivotal year. American School Board Journal, 191(2). Retrieved from http://www.asbj.com/2004/02/0204research.html
4.
Cotton, K. (2001). New small learning communities: Findings from recent literature. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Library.
5.
Cushman, K. (2003). Fires in the bathroom: Advice for teachers from high school students. New York: New Press.
6.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2002). Redesigning schools: What matters and what works. Stanford, CA: School Redesign Network at Stanford University. Retrieved from http://www.schoolredesign.net
7.
Editorial Projects in Education. (EPE). (2006). Ohio graduation report. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/toc/2006/06/22/index.html
8.
Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school. Albany: State University of New York Press.
9.
Gladden, R. (1998). The small school movement: A review of the literature. In M. Fine & J. Somerville (Eds.), Small schools, big imaginations: A creative look at public schools (pp. 113-133). Chicago: Cross City Campaign for Urban School Reform.
10.
Glasser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Adeline.
11.
Haney, W. (2003). The Grade 9 valve in the education pipeline. Paper presented at the School-to-Prison Pipeline Conference, Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University; Northeastern University: Institute on Race and Justice.
12.
Hertzog, C., & Morgan, P. (1996). Transition from middle school to high school: Effects on students’ self-concept and comparisons between their teachers and administrators. Covington: Georgia Middle School Association.
13.
Hertzog, C., & Morgan, P. (1998). Breaking the barriers between middle school and high school: Developing a transition team for student success. NASSP Bulletin, 82(597), 94-98.
14.
Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study application in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
Mizelle, N., & Irvin, J. (2000). Transition from middle school to high school: What research says. Middle School Journal, 31(5), 57-61.
16.
National Center for Education Statistics. (NCES). (1990). National education longitudinal study of 1988: First follow-up study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
17.
Olsen, L. (2006). The down staircase. Education Week, 25(415), 5-6, 10-11.
18.
Raywid, M. (1999). Current literature on small schools. Retrieved from http://www.ael.org/eric/digests/edorc988.htm.
19.
Schargel, F., & Smink, J. (2001). Strategies to help solve our school dropout problem. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
20.
Singleton, R., & Straights, B. (1999). Approaches to social research (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Tierney, J., Grossman, J., & Resch, N. (1995). Making a difference: An impact study of big brothers/big sisters. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
22.
Wheelock, A. (1993, July). School reform for secondary school students: A case for focusing, on ninth grade. Unpublished manuscript.
23.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
