Although much research exists on student motivation, few studies speak directly with students or highlight their voices. In this grounded theory study, we interviewed and observed reluctant learners in an alternative high school to learn what factors they saw as contributing to their school successes and failures. Themes emerging from the participants’ words were echoed by themes found in motivation research. Building relationships with teachers, being interested in school assignments, and feeling competent to perform tasks were mentioned by the students as influencing their levels of engagement. The qualitative data suggested ways for teachers to create motivating learning environments.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
2.
Brophy, J. (1998). Failure syndrome students (Report No. EDO-PS-98-2). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED419625)
3.
Calkins, L. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Clandinin, D., & Connelly, F. (1995). Professional knowledge landscapes: Secret, sacred, and cover stories. In D. Clandinin & F. Connelly (Eds.), Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes (pp. 3-15). New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
Covington, M. (1992). Making the grade. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
9.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Deci, E. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 325-346.
11.
Deci, E. (1995). Why we do what we do. New York: Penguin Books.
12.
Deci, E., & Cascio, W. (1972, April). Changes in intrinsic motivation as a function of negative feedback and threats. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
13.
Deci, E., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1-26.
14.
Dweck, C. (1985). Intrinsic motivation, perceived control, and self-evaluation maintenance: An achievement goal analysis. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (pp. 289-306). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
15.
Dweck, C. (1991). Self-theories and goals: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Perspectives on motivation (pp. 199-236). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
16.
Dweck, C. (2000). How can teachers develop students’ motivation and success?Education World. Retrieved March 8, 2001, from www.education-world.com/a_curr/curr197.shtml
17.
Erickson, F. (1984). School literacy, reasoning, and civility: An anthropologist’s perspective. Review of Educational Research, 54(4), 525-546.
18.
Erickson, F. (1987). Transformation and school success. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18(4), 335-356.
19.
Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148-162.
21.
Gaskins, I. (1998). There’s more to teaching at-risk and delayed readers than good reading instruction. Reading Teacher, 51(7), 534-546.
22.
Gratz, D. (2000). High standards for whom?Phi Delta Kappan, 81(9), 681-687.
23.
Gurian, M. (2001). Boys and girls learn differently! A guide for teachers and parents. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Lumsden, L. (1994). Student motivation to learn (Report No. OERI RR93002006). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved September 7, 2000, from www.eric.uoregon.edu/publications/digests/digest092.html
25.
Marks, H. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153-184.
26.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
McPhail, J., Pierson, J., Freeman, J., Goodman, J., & Ayappa, A. (2000). The role of interest in fostering sixth grade students’ identities as competent learners. Curriculum Inquiry, 30(1), 43-70.
29.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
30.
Neill, M. (2003). The dangers of testing. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 43-46.
31.
Newkirk, T. (2002). Misreading masculinity: Boys, literacy, and popular culture. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
32.
Oldfather, P. (1994). When students do not feel motivated for literacy learning: How a responsive classroom culture helps. Athens: University of Georgia. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED365966)
33.
Pollack, W. (1998). Real boys: Rescuing our sons from the myths of boyhood. New York: Random House.
34.
Relic, P. (2000). The trouble with the standards movement. Independent School, 9, 11-12,
35.
Shernoff, D., Schneider, B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). The quality of learning experiences in American classrooms: Toward a phenomenology of student engagement. Unpublished manuscript.
36.
Smith, M., & Wilhelm, J. (2002). Reading don’t fix no Chevys: Literacy in the lives of young men. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
37.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Strong, R., Silver, H., & Robinson, A. (1995). What do students want and what really motivates them?Educational Leadership. Retrieved March 8, 2001, from www.middleweb.com/StdntMot.html
39.
Thompson, S. (2001). The authentic standards movement and its evil twin. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(5), 358-362.
40.
Valencia, S., & Wixson, K. (2000). Policy-oriented research on literacy standards and assessment. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 909-935). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Weaver-Hightower, M. (2003). The “boy turn” in research on gender and education. Review of Educational Research, 73(4), 471-498.
43.
Wentzel, K. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 411-419.
