This article examines the sociocultural scaffolding practices of 24 Latino paraeducators and 8 former Latino paraeducators (who had recently become teachers) as they worked with Latino students in two large urban schools. Instances were observed in which participants used important funds of knowledge in their interactions with students during instruction, in informal contexts, and in the case of the current paraeducators to inform the teachers with whom they worked in the community. Unfortunately, use of sociocultural scaffolding was scarce, nonstrategic, and not directly tied to instruction. We argue that under ideal instructional conditions, this knowledge should be fostered, used strategically, and appropriated more systematically.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Apple, M. (1995). Education and power. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
2.
Artiles, A. J., Rueda, R., Salazar, J., & Higareda, J. (2000, November). Factors associated with English-learner representation in special education: Emerging evidence from urban school districts in California. Paper presented at the Minority Issues in Special Education Conference, Cambridge, MA.
3.
Au, K. H., & Jordan, C. (1981). Teaching reading to Hawaiian children: Finding a culturally appropriate solution. In H. T. Trueba, G. P. Guthrie, & K. H. Au (Eds.), Teaching reading to Hawaiian children: Finding a culturally appropriate solution (pp. 139-152). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
4.
Au, K. H., & Kawakami, A. J. (1994). Cultural congruence in instruction. In E. R. Hollins, J. E. King, & W. C. Hayman (Eds.), Teaching diverse populations: Formulating a knowledge base (pp. 5-23). New York: State University of New York Press.
5.
Au, K. H., & Mason, J. M. (1983).Cultural congruencein classroom participation structures: Achieving a balance of rights. Discourse Processes, 6, 145-167.
6.
August, D., & Hakuta, K. (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7.
Bhimji, F. (1997). ¡Mueve la almohada! ¡Levanta la cara! [Move the pillow! Lift your head!] Correction talk in Mexican and Central American parent child interaction. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 8, 133-145.
8.
Cooper, C., & Gándara, P. (2001). When diversity works: Bridging families, peers, schools, and communities at CREDE Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Cuellar, I., Arnold, B., & Maldonado, R. (1995). Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican American II—A revision of the original ARSMA scale. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 17, 275-304.
10.
Cummins,J. (1996). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society. Ontario: California Association for Bilingual Education.
11.
D’Amato, J. (1988). “Acting”: Hawaiian children’s resistance to teachers. Elementary School Journal, 88(5), 529-544.
12.
Dandy, E. B. (1998). Increasing the number of minority teachers: Tapping the paraprofessional pool. Education and Urban Society, 31(1), 89-103.
13.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55, 6-11.
14.
Delgado-Gaitan, C., & Trueba, H. (1991). Crossing cultural borders: Education for immigrant families in America. New York: Falmer.
15.
Foster, M. (1993). Educating for competence in community and culture: Exploring the views of exemplary African American teachers. Urban Education, 27(4), 370-394.
16.
Galindo, R., & Olguín, M. (1996). Reclaiming bilingual educators’ cultural resources: An autobiographical approach. Urban Education, 31(1), 29-56.
17.
Gándara, P., Maxwell-Jolly, J., García, E., Asato, J., Gutierrez, K., Stritikus, T., et al. (2000). The initial impact of Proposition 227 on the instruction of English learners. Santa Barbara, CA: Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
18.
Garcia, E. (2000). Student cultural diversity: Understanding and meeting the challenge. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
19.
Genzuk, M. (1995). Integration factors affecting commitment to educational and occupational goals for Latino paraeducators. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(02A), 600-600. (UMI No. 9616962)
20.
Genzuk, M., & Baca, R. (1998). The paraeducator to teacher pipeline: A 5-year retrospective on an innovative teacher preparation program for Latinas(os). Education and Urban Society, 31(1), 73-88.
21.
Gibson, M. A. (1998).Promoting academic success among immigrant students: Is acculturation the issue? Educational Policy, 12(6), 615-633.
22.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
23.
Goldenberg, C., & Gallimore, R. (1995). Immigrant Latino parents’values and beliefs about their children’s education: Continuities and discontinuities across cultures and generations. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 9, 183-228.
24.
Gutierrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P., Alvarez, H. H., & Chiu, M. M. (1999). Building a culture of collaboration through hybrid language practices. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 87-93.
25.
Haselkorn, D., & Fideler, E. (1996). Breaking the class ceiling: Paraeducator pathways to teaching. Belmont, MA: Recruiting New Teachers.
26.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Hollins, E. R., & Oliver, E. I. (Eds.). (1999). Pathways to success in school: Culturally responsive teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Hornberger, N. (1990). Creating successful learning contexts for bilingual literacy. Teachers College Record, 92, 212-229.
29.
Kawakami, A. (1999). Sense of place, community, and identity: Bridging the gap between home and school for Hawaiian students. Education and Urban Society, 32(1), 18-40.
30.
King, J. E. (1991). Dysconscious racism: Ideology, identity, and the miseducation of teachers. Journal of Negro Education, 60(2), 133-146.
31.
McCollum, P. (1989). Turn-allocation in lessons with North American and Puerto Rican students: A comparative study. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 20(2), 133-156.
32.
McIntyre, E., Rosebery, A., & Gonzalez, N. (2001). Classroom diversity: Connecting curriculum to students’lives. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
33.
Melnick, S. L., & Zeichner, K. M. (1998). Teacher education’s responsibility to address diversity issues: Enhancing institutional capacity. Theory Into Action, 37(2), 88-95.
34.
Michaels, S. (1981). “Sharing time”: Children’s narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in Society, 10(4), 423-442.
35.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Mohatt, G. V., & Erickson, F. (1981). Cultural differences in teaching styles in an Odawa school: A sociolinguistic approach. In H. T. Trueba, G. P. Guthrie, & K. H. Au (Eds.), Teaching reading to Hawaiian children: Finding a culturally appropriate solution. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
37.
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Nett, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132-141.
38.
Moll, L. C., & Diaz, S. (1987).Change as the goal of educational research. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18, 300-311.
39.
Moll, L. C., & González, N. (1994). Lessons from research with language-minoritychildren. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26(4), 339-457.
40.
Moll, L. C., & Greenberg, J. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: Combining social contexts for instruction. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 319-348). New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Monzó, L., & Rueda, R. (2000, April). Shaping education through diverse funds of knowledge: Examining one Latina paraeducator’s experiences, beliefs, and teaching practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
42.
Monzó, L. D., & Rueda, R. S. (2001). Sociocultural factors in social relationships: Examining Latino teachers’and paraeducators’interactions with Latino language minority students (Report No. 9). Santa Cruz: University of California, Center for Research on Education, Diversity, & Excellence.
43.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1996). Urban schools: The challenge of location and poverty. Washington,DC: Department of Education,Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
44.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2000a). Characteristics of the 100 largest public elementary and secondary school districts in the United States: 1998-1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
45.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2000b). Overview of public and secondary schools and districts: School year 1998-99. Washington, DC: Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
46.
Philips, S. (1983). The invisible culture: Communication in classroom and community on the Warm Springs Indian Reservation. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
47.
Reese, L., & Gallimore, R. (2000). Immigrant Latinos’ cultural model of literacy development: An evolving perspective on home school discontinuities. American Journal of Education, 108(2), 103-134.
48.
Reyes, M. de la Luz, Laliberty, A. E., & Orbanosky, J. M. (1993). Emerging biliteracy and cross-cultural sensitivity in a language arts classroom. Language Arts, 70, 459-468.
49.
Rueda, R., Genzuk, M., Baca, R., & Hentschke, G. (1999). Latino paraeducators as teachers: Building on funds of knowledge to improve instruction. Santa Cruz: University of California, Center on Excellence, Diversity, & Education.
50.
Rueda, R., & Monzó, L. (in press). Apprenticeship for teaching: Professional development issues surrounding the collaborative relationship between teachers and paraeducators. Teaching and Teacher Education.
51.
Saunders, W. M., & Goldenberg, C. N. (1999). Effects of instructional conversations and literature logs on limited- and fluent-English-proficient students’story comprehension and thematic understanding. Elementary School Journal, 99(4), 277-301.
52.
Shannon, S. M. (1995). The culture of the classroom: Socialization in an urban bilingual classroom. Urban Review, 27(4), 321-345.
53.
Sleeter, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (1988). Making choices for multicultural education: Five approaches to race, class, and gender. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Tharp, R., Estrada, P., Dalton, S., & Yamauchi, L. A. (2000). Teaching transformed: Achieving excellence, fairness, inclusion, and harmony. Boulder, CO: Westview.
56.
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Tharp, R. G., Rivera, H., Youpa, D., Dalton, S., Guardino, G., & Lasky, S. (1999). ASOS: Activity Setting Observation System coding rule book. Santa Cruz: University of California, Center for Research on Education, Diversity, & Excellence.
58.
Valdez, G., & Figueroa, R. A. (1994). Bilingualism and testing: A special case of bias. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
59.
Vasquez, O. A., Pease-Alvarez, L., & Shannon, S. M. (1994). Pushing boundaries: Language and culture in a Mexicano community. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). In R. Rieber & A. Carton (Eds.), L. S. Vygotsky, collected works (Vol. 1, N. Minick, Trans.). New York: Plenum. (Original work published 1934)
61.
Weiss, M. S. (1994). Marginality, cultural brokerage, and school aides: A success story in education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 25(3), 336-346.
62.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
63.
Young, L. J. (1998). Care, community, and context in a teacher education classroom. Theory Into Practice, 37(2), 105-113.
64.
Zimpher, N. L. (1989).The RATE project: A profile of teacher education students. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(6), 27-30.
