Comparing Poor,Minority Elementary Students' Interest And Background In Science With That Of Their White,Affluent Peers

Abstract

Using survey data, poor, minority, inner-city elementary students were compared with White, affluent children regarding science information, science experiences, and personal preferences concerning science education. The students' perceptions of scientists, levels of disciplinary knowledge, sources of science information, voluntary science-related activities, and desired amounts of school science instruction were also investigated. The results, contrary to common expectations, indicated several areas where the two groups did not differ. The level of science knowledge was found to be higher among the White, affluent group. However, attitudes toward science were more positive, the current amount of instructional time devoted to science was greater, and a desire for more science instruction was evidenced among the inner-city, minority students.

Keywords

minorities elementary low SES cities science

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alper, J. (1993). The pipeline is leaking women all the way. Science, 26, 409-411.

Barman, C.R. (1996). How do students really view science and scientists? Science and Children, 34, 30-33.

Barman, C.R. (1997). Students' views of scientists and science: Results from a national study. Science and Children, 35, 18-23.

Barnes-Svarney, J. (1999). The New York Public Library science desk reference. New York: Macmillan.

Bauer, S.M. , & Toms, K. (1990, February). Science in the elementary schools: Teachers' perceptions of test mandated curriculum reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Boston.

Boylan, C.R. , Hill, D.M. , & Walliace, A.R. (1992). Beyond stereotypes, Science Education, 76, 465-476.

Changing face of the city. (2000, March 26). The Buffalo News, p. 21.

Catsambis, S. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 243-257.

Chambers, D.W. (1983). Stereotypic images of scientists: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 56, 255-265.

10.

Fort, D.C. , & Varney, H.L. (1989). How students see scientists: Mostly male mostly white, and mostly benevolent. Science and Children, 26, 8-13.

11.

Huber, R.A. , & Burton, G.M. (1995). What do students think scientists look like? School Science and Mathematics, 95, 371-376.

12.

Jones, G. , Howe, A. , & Rua, M. (2000). Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84, 180-192.

13.

Jovanovic, J. , Solano-Flores, G. , & Shavelson, R.J. (1994). Performance-based assessment: Will gender differences in science achievement be eliminated? Education and Urban Society, 26, 353-366.

14.

Kraus, J.P. (1977). How children "see" scientists. Science and Children, 14, 9-10.

15.

Mechling, K. (1983). Taking charge: How principals can improve school science programs. Principal, 62, 16-21.

16.

Office of Science and Technology Policy . (1991). Report No. 47. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

17.

Ralph, J. , Keller, D. , & Crouse, J. (1994). How effective are American schools? Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 144-149.

18.

Schoeneberger, M. , & Russell, T. (1986). Elementary science as a little added frill: A report of two case studies, Science Education, 70, 519-538.

19.

Sherwood, R.D. , & Westerback, M.E. (1983). A factor analytic study of the state-trait anxiety inventory utilized with preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 225-229.

20.

Tilger, P.J. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school. Science Education, 74, 421-431.

21.

University of the State of New York . (1996). Learning standards for mathematics, science, and technology. Albany, NY: The State Education Department.