Urban areas dominated by growth do not follow the same progrowth strategies for development. Some cities have adopted development policies that seek to redistribute the costs and benefits of downtown economic development. This is not necessarily, however, an antigrowth strategy but is, rather, a progressive growth agenda. In this comparative study, the characteristics of growth politics are examined through downtown development strategies that affect commercial development and neighborhood housing. The distribution of costs and benefits of such development to commercial and residential sectors indicates different public/private relationships that can be found within growth politics.
Barnekov, T. , and D. Rich. 1989. Privatism and the limits of local economic development policy. Urban Affairs Quarterly25:212-238.
3.
Beatley, T.1988. Development exactions and social justice. In Private supply ofpublic services, edited by R. Alterman, 83-95. New York: New York Univ. Press.
4.
Bernard, R. , and B. Rice, eds. 1983. Sunbelt cities. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
5.
Bowman, A.1988. Competition for economic development among southeastern cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly23:511-527.
6.
Bureau of Economic and Business Research . 1989. Florida estimates of population: April 1, 1988. Gainesville: University of Florida.
7.
Clavel, P.1986. The progressive city. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.
8.
DeGrove, J.1984. Land, growth and politics. Chicago: American Planning Association Planners Press.
9.
deHaven-Smith, L.1987. Environmental publics. Monograph 87-2. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
10.
DiGaetano, A.1989. Urban political regime formation. Journal of Urban Affairs2:261-281.
11.
Eisinger, P.1988. The rise of the entrepreneurial state. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.
12.
Elkin, S.1985. Twentieth century urban regimes. Journal of Urban Affairs7:11-28.
13.
Fainstein, N. , and S. Fainstein. 1987. Economic restructuring and the politics of land use planning in New York City. Journal of the American PlanningAssociation53:237-248.
14.
Feagin, J.1986. Urban real estate speculation in the United States. In Critical perspectives on housing, edited by R. Bratt, C. Hartman, and A. Meyerson, 99-118. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
15.
Fishkind, H. , J. W. Milliman, and R. W. Ellson. 1978. A pragmatic econometric approach to assessing economic impacts of growth or decline in urban areas. Land Economics54:442-460.
16.
Florida State Comprehensive Plan Committee . 1987. Keys to Florida's future. Tallahassee: Author.
17.
Fort Lauderdale Planning Department . 1989. Future land use element-comprehensive plan. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Author.
18.
Frederick, W.1988. Orlando state of the city '88. Quality Cities62 (1): 2-5, 9-11.
19.
Frieden, B. , and L. Sagalyn. 1989. Downtown, Inc.Cambridge: MIT Press.
20.
Friedland, R.1983. The politics of profit and the geography of growth. Urban Affairs Quarterly19:41-54.
21.
Goetz, E.1991. Type H policy and mandated benefits in economic development. Urban Affairs Quarterly26:170-190.
22.
Hillsborough County, City-County Planning Commission . 1989a. Future of Hillsborough comprehensive plan for Tampa: Future land use element. Tampa, FL: Author.
23.
Hillsborough County, City-County Planning Commission . 1989b. Future of Hillsborough comprehensive plan for Tampa: Housing element. Tampa, FL: Author.
24.
Jacksonville Downtown Development Authority (DDA) . 1988. Initial action plan for Jacksonville's core business district. Jacksonville, FL: Author.
Jacksonville Planning Department . 1989. Comprehensive plan 2010: Housing element. Jacksonville, FL: Author.
27.
Jones, B. , ed. 1989. Leadership and politics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
28.
Judd, D. , and M. Parkinson, eds. 1990. Urban affairs annual review. Vol. 37, Leadership and urban regeneration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Kantor, P.1987. The dependent city: The changing political economy of urban economic development in the United States. Urban Affairs Quarterly22:493-520.
30.
Kerstein, R. 1989. The political-economy of urban development in Tampa. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, Baltimore, MD, March.
31.
Kerstein, R.1991. Growth politics in Tampa and Hillsborough county. Journal of Urban Affairs13:55-76.
32.
Lassar, T.1989. Carrots and sticks: New zoning downtown. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
33.
Levine, M.1989. The politics of partnership. In Unequal partnerships, edited by G. Squires, 12-34. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.
34.
Logan, J. , and H. Molotch. 1987. Urban fortunes. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
35.
Lubove, S.1990. Tampa Bay. Florida Trend32 (10): 47.
36.
Merriam, D. , D. Brower, and P. Tegeler, eds. 1985. Inclusionary zoning moves downtown. Chicago: American Planning Association Planners Press.
37.
Mitchell, S. R.1990. The housing connection. Planning56 (9): 18-19.
38.
Mollenkopf, J.1983. The contested city. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
39.
Molotch, H.1976. The city as growth machine. American Journal of Sociology82:309-331.
40.
Orlando Planning Department . 1982. Downtown Orlando redevelopment area plan. Orlando, FL: Author.
41.
Orlando Planning Department . 1989. Growth management area plan: Downtown, updates. Orlando, FL: Author.
42.
Peterson, P.1981. City limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
43.
Porter, D.1985. The office/housing linkage issue. Urban Land44 (9): 16-21.
44.
Porter, D. , and T. Lassar. 1988. The latest on linkage. Urban Land48 (12): 7-11.
45.
Reed, C. , B. J. Reed, and J. S. Luke. 1987. Assessing readiness for economic development strategic planning. Journal of the American Planning Association53:521-530.
46.
Robinson, C.1989. Municipal approaches to economic development. Journal of the American Planning Association55:283-295.
47.
South Florida Regional Planning Council . 1989. Downtown Fort Lauderdale trends & conditions. Hollywood: Author.
48.
Squires, G. , ed. 1989. Unequal partnerships. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.
49.
Stone, C.1980. Systemic power in community decision making. American Political Science Review74:978-990.
50.
Stone, C.1984. City politics and economic development: Political economy perspectives. Journal of Politics46:286-299.
51.
Stone, C.1987a. The study of the politics of urban development. In The politics of urban development, edited by C. Stone and H. Sanders, 3-24. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
52.
Stone, C.1987b. Summing up: Urban regimes, development policy, and political arrangements. In The politics of urban development, edited by C. Stone and H. Sanders, 269-290. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
53.
Stone, C.1989. Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-88. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
54.
Swanstrom, T.1985. The crisis of growth politics. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
55.
Tampa Community Redevelopment Agency . 1983. CRA plan for the downtown community redevelopment area. Tampa, FL: Author.
56.
Tampa Mayor's Downtown Advisory Committee . 1988. Downtown land use policy plan support documents. Tampa, FL: Author.
57.
Turner, R. S.1990a. New rules for the growth game. Journal of Urban Affairs12 (1): 35-48.
58.
Turner, R. S.1990b. Downtown development in four Florida cities: Final report. Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton. Photocopy.
59.
U.S. Bureau of the Census . 1980. Detailed population characteristics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
60.
Vogel, R. K. , and B. E. Swanson. 1989. The growth machine versus the antigrowth coalition. Urban Affairs Quarterly25:63-85.
61.
White, L.1989. Public management in a pluralistic arena. Public Administration Review49:522-532.
62.
Wong, K.1990. City choices. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
63.
Wrenn, D.1987. Making downtown housing happen. Urban Land46 (4): 16-19.
