Firms' headquarters in larger urban areas are shown to be more active in the merger process and more likely to be predators than firms located in smaller places. The larger the metropolitan area, the stronger the tendencies. The findings are attributable to (1) the disproportionate presence of large corporations in large urban areas and (2) efficiency advantages of large metropolitan locations, which include face-to-face communications, establishing and maintaining business relationships, maintaining interurban linkages, and attracting top talent. The shift of corporate headquarters away from smaller places has adversely affected the economies of those regions through decreased employment, income loss, and a decline in future development prospects. The spatial asymmetries have implications for economic development policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Auerbach, A. J. , and D. Reishus. 1988. The effects of taxation on the merger decision. In Corporate takeovers: Causes and consequences, edited by A. J. Auerbach, 157-183. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
2.
Benston, G. J.1980. Conglomerate mergers, causes and consequences. Washington, DC: American Institute for Policy Research.
3.
Bertsch, L. J. 1990. An investigation of mergers and acquisitions and their impact on the state of Ohio. Master's thesis, College of Business Administration, Wright State University, Dayton, OH.
4.
Blair, J. P. , C. R. Endres, and R. Fichtenbaum. 1990. Japanese automotive investment in westcentral Ohio: Locational factors, community impacts and labor-management issues. In The politics of industrial recruitment, edited by W. Green and E. J. Yanarella, 117-135. New York: Greenwood.
5.
Britton, J.W.H.1974. Environmental adaptation of industrial plants: Service linkages. Locational environments and organization. In Spatial perspectives on industrial organization and decision-making, edited by I. Hamilton, 363-389. London: Wiley.
6.
Bums, L. S.1977. The location of the headquarters of industrial companies. Urban Studies14(2): 211-214.
7.
Cook, R. E.1987. What the economics literature has to say about takeovers. Working Paper no. 106. St. Louis: Center for the Study of American Business, Washington University.
8.
Evans, A. W.1973. The location of the headquarters of industrial companies. Urban Studies14:387-396.
9.
Evans, A. W.1985. Urban economics: An introduction. New York: Blackwell.
10.
Evers, H. J. , and R. W. Wettmann. 1980. Innovation oriented regional policy. Regional Studies114:161-179.
11.
Franks, J. R. , R. S. Harris, and C. Mayer. 1988. Means of payment in takeovers: Results for the United Kingdom and the United States. In Corporate takeovers: Causes and consequences, edited by A. J. Auerbach, 221-258. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
12.
Friedland, R.1983. Power and crisis in the city. New York: Schocken.
13.
Goddard, J. B. , and I. J. Smith. 1978. Changes in corporate control in the British urban system, 1972-1977. Environment and Planning A10:1073-1084.
14.
Groshen, E. L. , and B. Grothe. 1989. Mergers, acquisitions and evolution of the region's corporations. Economic Commentary, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, 1 August.
15.
Grundfest, J. A. , G. Jarrell, S. C. Salop, and L. J. White. 1988. Panel discussion: Corporate takeovers and public policy. In Corporate takeovers: Causes and consequences, edited by A. J. Auerbach, 311-332. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
16.
Harrison, B. , and B. Bluestone. 1988. The great U-turn: Corporate restructuring and the polarizing of America. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Hines, P. , and R. J. Chrenc. 1986. Relations with professional resources. In The CEO'S handbook, edited by R. F. Vancil, 439-454. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
18.
Jensen, M. C. , and R. S. Ruback. 1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics11:5-50.
19.
Kantor, P.1988. The dependent city. Boston: Scott, Foresman.
20.
Kieschnick, M.1981. Taxes and growth: Business incentives and economic development. Washington, DC: Council of State Planning Agencies.
21.
Knight, R. V.1987. Governing the post-industrial metropolis—Building the global city. Akron: Institute for Futures Studies and Research, Univ. of Akron. Monograph.
22.
Leigh, R. , and D. J. North. 1974. Acquisitions in British industries: Implications for regional development. In Spatial perspectives on industrial organization, edited by F.E.I. Hamilton, 158-181. New York: Wiley.
23.
Mergers and Acquisitions. 1986-1989 [bimonthly publication]. Philadelphia, PA: MLR Publishing.
24.
Mork, R. , A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Characteristics of targets of hostile and friendly takeovers. In Corporate takeovers: Causes and consequences, edited by A. J. Auerbach, 101-136. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
25.
Norgaard, R. B.1984. Coevolutionary development potential. Land Economics60:159-167.
26.
Noyelle, T. J. , and T. M. Stanback, Jr.1984. The economic transformation of American cities. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
27.
Pred, A. R.1977. City systems in advanced economies: Pastgrowth, present processes and future development options. New York: Halsted.
28.
Quante, W.1976. The exodus of corporate headquarters from New York City. New York: Praeger.
29.
Rees, J.1979. Technological changes and regional shifts in American manufacturing. Professional Geographer31:45-54.
30.
Simple, R. K.1973. Recent trends in the spatial concentration of corporate headquarters. Economic Geography49:309-318.
31.
Smith, I. J.1979. The effect of external takeovers on manufacturing employment change in the northern region between 1963 and 1973. Regional Studies13:421-437.
32.
Standard& Poor's Registert1989. New York: Dun's Marketing Service.
33.
Stephens, J. D. , and B. P. Holly. 1981. City system behavior and corporate influence: The headquarters location of U.S. industrial firms, 1955-75. Urban Studies118:285-300.
34.
Thompson, W. R. , and P. R. Thompson. 1987. Alternative paths to revival of industrial cities. In The future of winter cities, edited by G. Gappert, 233-250. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
