The severe fiscal constraints affecting the city of Detroit in the early 1980s, although resulting in reductions in funding and personnel for city departments, had little impact on citizen perceptions of city services, as reflected in levels of complaints received by the city's Ombudsman Office. Analysis also revealed that bureaucratic responses and response times were relatively unaffected by cuts in resources. City agencies generally adhered to standardized procedures in providing services and responding to complaints.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BACHELOR, L. (1984) "Citizen contacts with a central complaint office: the case of the Detroit ombudsman."State and Local Government Rev.16 (Spring): 69-74.
2.
JONES, B. D. , S. R. GREENBERG, and J. DREW (1980) Service Delivery in the City. New York: Longman's.
3.
JONES, B. D. , S. R. GREENBERG, C. KAUFMAN, and J. DREW (1977) "Bureaucratic response to citizen initiated contacts: environmental enforcement in Detroit."Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.72 (March): 148-165.
4.
LEVINE, C. H. , I. S. RUBIN, and G. G. WOLOHOJIAN (1981) The Politics of Retrenchment: How Local Governments Manage Fiscal Stress. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
MLADENKA, K. R. (1981) "Citizen demands and urban services: the distribution of bureaucratic response in Chicago and Houston."Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.25 (November): 693-714.
6.
THOMAS, J. C. (1982) "Citizen initiated contacts with government agencies: a test of three theories."Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.26 (August): 504-522.
7.
VEDLITZ, A. , J. A. DYER, and R. DURAND (1980) "Citizen contacts with local governments: a comparative view."Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.24 (February): 50-67.
