AdrianC.PressC. (1973) Governing Urban America. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
AtipanyaP. (1966) “Amnat naathii khong palad tesaban nai kaan borihan ngan thong thin” [“The authority of the municipal clerk in local government”] M. A. Thesis, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand.
3.
CaidenN.WildavskyA. (1974) Planning and Budgeting in Poor Countries. New York: John Wiley.
4.
ChayabutraC. (1965) “A comparative study of local government in Thailand and England.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Exeter, England.
5.
ClarkT. N. (1973) Community Power and Policy Outputs: A Review of Urban Research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
6.
EcksteinH. (1975) “Case study and theory in political science,” pp. 104–108 in GreensteinF.PolsbyN. (eds.) Handbook of Political Science. Volume 7: Strategies of Inquiry. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.
FriedR. (1963) The Italian Prefects: A Study in Administrative Politics. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
8.
HersonL. (1957) “The lost world of municipal government.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.51: 330–345.
9.
HorriganF. (1959) “Local government and administration in Thailand: A study of institutions and their cultural setting.” Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
10.
IlchmanW. (1971) Comparative Public Administrative and “Conventional” Wisdom. Beverly Hills: Sage.
11.
IlchmanW.UphoffN. (1971) The Political Economy of Change. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
12.
JacobH.LipskyM. (1968) “Outputs, structure, and power: An assessment of changes in the study of state and local politics.” Politics30: 510–538.
13.
KarnjanaprakornC. (1959) “Municipal government in Thailand as an institution and process of self-government.” Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
14.
KesselmanM. (1974) “Research perspectives in comparative local politics: Pitfalls, prospects, and notes on the French case,” pp. 353–381 in ClarkT. N. (ed.) Comparative Community Politics. New York: John Wiley.
15.
KesselmanM. (1967) The Ambiguous Consensus: A Study of Local Government in France. New York: Knopf.
16.
KesselmanM.RosenthalD. (1974) Local Power and Comparative Politics. Beverly Hills: Sage.
17.
KrannichR. L. (1981) “Centralization, periphery autonomy, and political bosses in urban Thailand.” (unpublished).
18.
KrannichR. L. (1980) “Administrative leadership of mayors: The politics of mayor-manager relationships in Thailand.” Public Administration Rev. 40, 4: 330–341.
19.
KrannichR. L. (1979) “The politics of intergovernmental relations in Thailand.” Asian Survey 19, 5: 506–522.
20.
KrannichR. L. (1978a) Mayors and Managers in Thailand: The Struggle for Political Life in Administrative Settings. Athens: Ohio University Center for International Studies.
21.
KrannichR. L. (1978b) “The politics of street-level bureaucracy in Thailand.” Philippine J. of Public Administration 22 (April).
22.
KrannichR. L. (1976) “Assessing municipal government performance in Thailand: Political and administrative considerations.” Proceedings of the International Congress of Human Sciences in Asia and North America, Mexico City.
23.
KrannichR. L. (1974) “The construction firm as a middlemen: Toward a conceptual category of Thai urban development,” pp. 29–57 in KrannichR. L. et al. Urbanization in Thailand. DeKalb, IL: Center for Southeast Asian Studies.
24.
KrannichR. L.KrannichC. R. (1979) “Anonymous communications and bureaucratic politics in Thailand.” Administration and Society II, 2: 227–248.
25.
LantzC. (1971) “Field and network in Isan: A preliminary analysis of factional disputes in a market town of northeast Thailand.” Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University.
26.
LengelF. (1977) “Markets in Thailand: an analysis of the interrelationship between socio-cultural and economic factors.” Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University.
27.
LineberryR.FowlerE. (1968) “Reformism and public policies in American cities,” pp. 97–123 in WilsonJ. (ed.) City Politics and Public Policy. New York: John Wiley.
28.
LipskyM. (1976) “Toward a theory of street-level bureaucracy,” pp. 196-213 in HawleyW.LipskyM., Theoretical Perspectives on Urban Politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29.
LongN. (1958) “The local community as an ecology of games.” Amer. J. of Sociology64 (November): 251–261.
30.
LowiT. (1972) “Four systems of policy, politics and choice.” Public Administration Rev. (July/August)298–310.
31.
LowiT. (1946) “Machine politics—old and new.” Public Interest9: 83–89.
32.
Ministry of Interior (1973) “Orientation and promotion meeting for first and second-grade municipal clerks and assistant clerks.” Bangkok, September 12. (tape recording and translation by author).
33.
MorganD. R. (1979) Managing Urban America. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.
34.
NoranitipadungkarnC. (1970) Elites, Power Structure, and Politics in Thai Communities. Bangkok: The National Institute of Development Administration.
35.
RyanJ. (1959) “Bangkok government and administration: appearance and reality. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
36.
SalisburyR. (1964) “Urban politics: The new convergence of power.” J. of Politics26: 775–797.
37.
SavageP. (1976) “Optimism and pessimism in comparative administration.” Public Administration Rev. 36, 4: 415–423.
38.
SayreW.PolsbyN. (1965) “American political science and the study of urbanization,” pp. 115–159 in HauserP.SchnoreL. (eds.) The Study of Urbanization. New York: John Wiley.
39.
TarrowS. (1977) Between Center and Periphery: Grassroots Politicians in Italy and France. New Haven and London: Yale Univ. Press.
40.
UrairatA. (1974) “Housekeeping and politics.” National Municipal League of Thailand Journal2 (August): 11–14.
41.
WalkerJ. (1978) “Challenges of professional development for political science in the next decade and beyond.” Pol.11 (Fall): 484–491.
42.
WalshA. H. (1969) The Urban Challenge to Government. New York: Praeger.
43.
YatesD. (1977) The Ungovernable City: The Politics of Urban Problems and Policy-Making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
YatesD. (1976) “Urban government as a policy-making system,” pp. 235–264 in MasottiL.LineberryR. (eds.) The New Urban Politics. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.