Abstract
THESIS: The time is decisively ripe for the aggressive presentation of a perspective on Christian anthropology that differs, in significant respects, from every anthropological point of view now widely held or advocated. Stated negatively, the thesis finds every widely held point of view in Christian anthropology to be misleading because of its principally compensatory intent, resulting at best in one-sidedness and at worst in downright distortion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.