Abstract
This article re-examines the apparent divergence between the ostensibly pro-Roman orientation of Acts, and the lurid violence directed towards Rome in the Apocalypse. Going beyond the literal surface sense to explore the deeper meanings reveals in Acts a latent critique of Roman arrogance, epitomized by the cult of the emperor, and theomachy (fighting against God). Similarly, the Apocalypse should be read not as an attack on Rome itself, but on those who would compromise with the imperial cult and civic religion. Despite their obvious differences, these texts are united by their call to readers to fear God and keep his commandments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.