Abstract
Abstract
The association of formation for ordained ministry with residential experience still remains, in however attenuated form, a privileged assumption in the construction of clergy training programmes today — both residential and nonresidential alike. In the context ofsevere financial constraint alongside, ofcourse, the development ofnew forms ofministerial formation, this essay argues for a more nuanced and careful reflection on the propriety ofthis association in the light ofvarious experiments in training that non-residential courses have sought to pioneer.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.