Abstract
Simone Weil (1909–43) and Franz Rosenzweig (1886–1929) both responded to the First World War as if it were confirmation of a philosophical, political and religious crisis. This essay shows how much their analysis of the causes and nature of warfare had in common, though Weil increasingly assimilated this analysis to a fiercely anti-Judaic Christianity, while Rosenzweig believed that Jews and other Europeans had to reappropriate their Hebraic roots. Whereas the anti-political, semipacifist agenda of both writers has been taken as evidence of a highly personal eccentricity, the similarities highlighted by this comparison suggest they were more responsive to broader intellectual currents than has been commonly assumed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
