AATCC Test Method 20A, Fiber Analysis: Quantitative, AATCC Technical Manual, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1996.
2.
Brady, P.R., Penetration Pathways of Dyes into Natural Protein Fibers, vol. IV in "Proc. 8th International Wool Textile Research Conference," Wool Research Organization of New Zealand (Inc.), Christchurch, New Zealand, 1990, pp. 217-226.
3.
Leeder, J.D., Holt, L.A., Rippon, J.A., and Stapleton, I.W., Diffusion of Dyes and Other Reagents into the Wool Fiber, vol. IV in "Proc. 8th International Wool Textile Research Conference," Wool Research Organization of New Zealand (Inc.), Christchurch, New Zealand, 1990, pp. 227-238.
Sich, Jutta, Which is Best for Identifying Animal Fibers: Scanning Electron Microscopy or Light Microscopy, Textile Chem. Color. 22, 23-25 ( 1990).
6.
Von Bergen, W., Ed., "Wool Handbook," vol. 1, 3rd ed., Interscience, NY, 1963, pp. 248, 281, 360, 361.
7.
Wortmann, F.-J. , and Ams, W., Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy, Part I: Blends of Mohair and Cashmere with Sheep's Wool , Textile Res. J.56 (7), 442-446 (1986).
8.
Wortmann, F.-J. , and Wortmann, G., Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy, Part IV: Assessment of Light Microscopy as an Alternative Tool for Analyzing Wool/Specialty Fiber Blends, Textile Res. J.62, (7), 423-431 (1992).
9.
Wortmann, F.-J. , and Wortmann, G., Scanning Electron Microscopy as a Tool for the Analysis of Wool/Specialty Fiber Blends, Eurotex report, EEC Commett Program , Universidade do Minho, Azurem , P-4800 Guimaraes, Portugal, 1991.