Characteristic scale pattern data from batches of two fiber types commonly found in blends are gathered using imaging techniques applied to fiber surface images captured directly from a SEM. A database of fiber information is established, and linear discriminant statistical techniques are used to investigate the integrity of the data representing each fiber type. “Unknown” fiber classification strategies based on fiber type linear demarkation functions are employed with some success.
LangleyK. D.KennedyT. A. G., The Identification of Speciality Animal Fibers, Textile Res. J.51, 703–709 (1981).
3.
MaasdorpA. P. B.van RensbergN. A. G., The Relationship between Lustre and the Surface Characteristics of Textile Fibers, Proc. E.M. Soc. SA.13, 37–38 (1983).
4.
Minitab Inc., Minitab Reference Manual WINDOWS 9.1, 1993.
5.
NelsonG.HamlynP. F.HoldenL.McCarthyB. J., A Species-Specific DNA Probe for Goat Fiber Identification, Textile Res. J.62, 590–595 (1992).
6.
PhanK-H.WortmannF.-J.WortmannG.ArnsW., Characterisation of Speciality Fibres by Scanning Electron Microscopy, Schriftenr. Dtsches. Woll. Inst.103, 137–162 (1988).
RobsonD.WeedallP. J., Cuticular Scale Pattern Description using Image Processing and Analysis Techniques, in “Proc. 8th Int. Wool Text. Res. Conf. II,” 1990, pp. 402–410.
9.
RobsonD., Imaging Techniques for Animal Fibre Identification—A Critical Analysis, in “Metrology and Identification of Speciality Animal Fibres,” European Fine Fibre Network, occasional publication no. 4, 1996, pp. 33–43.
10.
SagarA. J. G.CalvertE.McCarthyB. J.NelsonG.SagarB. F., Characterisation of Keratin Fibres by Chemical Analysis, Schriftenr. Dtsches. Woll. Inst.106, 147–168 (1990).
11.
SichJ., Which is Best for Identifying Animal Fibres: Scanning Electron Microscopy or Light Microscopy?Textile Chem. Color.22 (8), 23–26 (1990).
12.
SkinkleJ. H., Determination of Wool and Mohair by Scale Size and Diameter, Am. Dyest. Rep.25, 620–621 (1936).
13.
SmutsS.HunterL.GeeE., The Identification of Mohair in Blends with Other Animal Fibres by Using their Frictional Properties, SAWTRI tech. rep. no. 457, 1980.
14.
SternotteA.KnottJ.PetitM., Quantitative Analysis of Blended Angora Rabbit Hair, in “Proc. 7th Int. Wool Text. Res. Conf. II,” 1985, pp. 205–214.
15.
Synoptics Ltd., Semper 6PLUS User's Manual, 1989.
16.
von BergenW. J., Cashmere, Melliand Textilber.1, 855–859 (1929).
17.
WildmanA. B., “The Microscopy of Animal Textile Fibres,”WIRA, Leeds, England, 1954.
18.
WortmannF-J.ArnsW., Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy, Part I: Blends of Mohair and Cashmere with Sheep's Wool, Textile Res. J.56, 442–446 (1986).
19.
WortmannF-J., Quantitative Fiber Mixture Analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy, Part III: Round Trial Results on Mohair/Wool Blends, Textile Res. J.61, 371–374 (1991).
