A Critical Evaluation of the Relationships Between Arealometer Instrument Values and Cotton Fiber Perimeter

Abstract

Arealometer instrument values are computer simulated to study the error in the calculated fiber perimeter P due to instrumental errors. (This airflow device senses the fiber's specific surface at two different specimen compressions; P and wall thickness t are computed from the readings.) Systematic changes over time in instrument values from designated true values are classified into thirteen nontrivial combinations. Each combination results in different P values and, consequently, a unique drift or error in P. Simulations of 50,000 Arealometer observations using actual standard deviation data from a control cotton are also run. These simulations show that random variations in instrument values over time are, in effect, an unordered sequence of the nontrivial combinations. Also, a mean taken from only two to six Arealometer observations— the accepted practice—does not adequately characterize a cotton sample. Fundamental relationships are probed with partial and total derivatives of Arealometer functions. There is more variability in the calculated P than in the t value. The total differential dP accurately measures the error in P, given the error in the instrument values.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Method of Test for Specific Area and Immaturity Ratio of Cotton Fibers (Arealometer Method), D 1449-58.

Buco, S.M. , Montalvo, J.G. , Jr., and Faught, S.E. , Data Analysis in the NIR Spectroscopy and Arealometer Measurements of Cotton Maturity and Fineness, presented to the 1991 Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conferences, San Antonio, TX, 1991.

Duckett, K.E. , Cain, J. , Krowicki, R.S. , and Thibodeaux , D.P. , Automating the Arealometer. Examination of the Kozeny Equation, Textile Res. J. 61, 309-318 (1991).

Geitel, K. , On the Theory of Air Flow Through Fibre Plugs, Faserforsch. Textiltech. 15, 21-29 (1964).

Ghosh, S. , How to Measure Cotton Maturity in Seconds, Textile Res. J. 55, 45 (1985).

Ghosh, S. , and Roy, R.B. , Quantitative Near Infrared Analysis of Reducing Sugars from the Surface of Cotton, J. Textile Inst. 79 (3), 504-510 (1988).

Hertel, K.L. , and Craven, C.J. , Cotton Fineness and Immaturity as Measured by the Arealometer, Textile Res. J. 21, 765-774 (1951).

Lawson, R. , and Ramey, H.H. , Jr., Comparison of Cotton Fiber Fineness and Maturity on Air-Flow Instruments , J. Testing Eval. 6, 248-252 (1978).

Lord, E. , and Heap, S.A. , "The Origin and Assessment of Cotton Fiber Maturity," International Institute for Cotton, Manchester, U.K., 1988.

10.

Montalvo, J.G. , Jr., A Comparative Study of NIR Diffuse Reflectance of Cottons Grouped According to Fiber Cross-Sectional Dimensions, Part I: Fundamentals, Appl. Spectrosc. 45, 779-789 (1991).

11.

Montalvo, J.G. , Jr., A Comparative Study of NIR Diffuse Reflectance of Cottons Grouped According to Fiber Cross-Sectional Dimensions, Part II: Optical Path Simulations, Appl. Spectrosc. 45, 790-794 (1991).

12.

Montalvo, J.G. , Jr., Faught, S.E. , and Buco, S.M. , A Comparative Study of NIR Diffuse Reflectance of Cottons Grouped According to Fiber Cross-Sectional Dimensions, Part III: Experimental, Appl. Spectrosc. 45, 795-807 (1991).

13.

Montalvo, J.G. , Jr., Faught, S.E. , and Buco, S.M. , Physical and Chemical Mechanisms in the NIR Spectroscopy and Arealometer Measurements of Cotton Maturity and Fineness , presented to the 1991 Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conferences, San Antonio, TX, 1991.

14.

Montalvo, J.G. , Jr., Faught, S.E. , and Buco, S.E. , An Investigation of the Relationship Between Cotton Fineness and Light-Scattering from Thin Webs as Measured by Near-Infrared Transmission Spectroscopy, Appl. Spectrosc. 43, 1459-1471 (1989).

15.

Montalvo, J.G. , Jr., Thibodeaux, D.P. , Faught, S.E. , and Buco, S.M. , Prediction of Cotton Fiber Maturity by Near Infrared Reflectance Analysis, Part I. Underlying Cause of Relationship , in "Proc. Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conferences," National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN, 1987, pp. 155-165.

16.

Morton, W.E. , and Radhakrishnan , S. , The Performance of the Arealometer in the Measurement of Fineness and Maturity of Raw Cotton , J. Textile Inst. 45, T774-T793 ( 1954).

17.

Neelakantan, P. , The Degree of Cell-Wall Thickening as a Measure of the Maturity of Cotton Fibers . J. Textile Inst. 66, 332-334 (1975).

18.

Pearson, N.L. , A Study of Fiber Perimeters as Calculated from Arealometer Values at Low and High Compression, Textile Res. J. 25, 124-136 (1955).

19.

Raes, G.A.T.J. , and Verschraege, L. , A Consideration of the Real Maturity of Cotton Fibers, J. Textile Inst. 72, 191-200 (1981).

20.

Ramey, H.H. , Jr., Estimating Quality Components of Natural Fibers by Near-Infrared Reflectance, Textile Res. J. 52, 20-25 (1982).

21.

Stephens, S.G. , A. New Method of Relating Airflow Measurements of Fineness and Maturity to the Geometrical Properties of the Cotton Fiber, Textile Res. J. 46, 835-841 (1976).

22.

Taylor, R.A. , Moisture Analysis for HVI Testing of Cotton , Textile Res. J. 60, 94-102 (1990).-

23.

Thibodeaux, D.P. , and Evans, J.P. , Cotton Fiber Maturity by Image Analysis , Textile Res. J. 56, 130-139 (1986).

24.

Vinyard, B.T. , and Montalvo, J.G. , Jr., Improving Arealometer Prediction of Cotton Fiber Cross-Sectional Parameters, presented to the Third Annual Kansas State Univ. Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture, Manhattan, KS, 1991.