Polypropylene is often hailed as a superior fiber for underwear for winter sports activities because of low water absorption and good wicking properties. Experiments were performed on a sweating hot plate to try to discern any difference in heat loss through polypropylene and cotton underwear. Differences were noted but were too small to have any discernible influence on the thermal well-being of the wearer.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, M.M., and Walsh, W.K., Mechanisms of Transient Moisture Transport Between Fabrics, Textile Res. J.54 (5), 334-343 (1984).
2.
Famworth, B. , Calculations of Heat and Vapour Transport in Clothing: Transient Effects in Hygroscopic Materials, Defence Research Establishment Ottawa Technical Note No. 80-25, 1980.
3.
Famworth, B. , and Nordli, B., Measurement of the Combined Heat and Water Vapour Flow through Clothing under Transient Conditions, Defence Research Establishment Ottawa Technical Note No. 82-13, 1982.
4.
Hollies, N.R.S. , Evaluation of Experimental Fabrics as Alternatives for Standard Wool Fabrics, Harris Research Laboratories Report No. 18, 1955.
5.
Mecheels, J.H. , and Umbach, K.H., The Psychometric Range of Clothing Systems, in "Clothing Comfort," N. R. S. Hollies and R. F. Goldman, Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan , 1977, pp. 133-151.
