Improved accuracy in Shirley analyzer results was obtained by modifying the stan dard analysis procedure, including a reconditioning period before final weighing of specimen fractions, identifying possible sources of variations in results, and identifying possible sources of error. The experimental analysis procedure provides almost com plete separation of free lint from trash. Invisible loss can be materially reduced by reconditioning lint and waste fractions. Variations in stock analysis results are associated with the amount of processing the stock received before analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DeLuca, L.B. and Montalvo, J.G., Jr., Cotton Particulates Analyzer, Design and Evaluation, Textile Res. J.51, 754-758 (1981).
2.
Research Report RR:D-13-1043, available on loan from ASTM Headquarters, 1916 Race St.. Philadelphia. Pa. 19103.
3.
Weller, H.W. Jr., and Claassen, B.J. Jr., Mechanisms of Dust Generation in Cotton Processing from the Bale through Carding, in "1980 Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference Proceedings," National Cotton Council, Memphis, Tenn.. 1980. pp. 79-81.
