Five test methods were compared on their potential for measuring the moisture absorhency ("thirstiness") of terry towels. The comparison was made by using both survey and laboratory techniques to determine the overall utility of each test for research applications. The results indicate that the Porous Plate and Sliding Block Methods have potential for measuring the moisture absorbency of towels. However, both tests have strengths and limitations, and the particular test chosen will depend on the researcher's needs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, "AATCC Membership Directory," Research Triangle Park, N. C., 1975.
2.
American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, "AATCC Technical Manual," Research Triangle Park, N. C., 1975.
3.
American Society for Testing and Materials, "1974 Annual Book of ASTM Standards," Philadelphia, 1974.
4.
Aycock, B.F. et al., The Effect of Repeated Application of Home Softeners Upon Absorbency and Other Properties of Terry Towels, Textile Chem. Color. 4, 16-21 (1972).
5.
Bogaty, H. et al., Some Properties of Serges Made from Blends of Wool with Acrylic Type Synthetics, Textile Res. J. 23, 536-544 (1953).
6.
Buras, E.M., Goldthwait, C.F., and Kraemer, R.M., Measurement and Theory of Absorbency of Cotton Fabrics, Textile Res. J. 20, 239-248 (1950).
7.
Cary, R.T., "A Comparison of Selected Test Methods for Measuring the Prime-Moisture Absorbency of Terry Toweling," Doctoral dissertation 77-15, 388, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1976,
8.
Gary, R.T. and Sproles, G.B., Evaluating Product Testing Methods: A Theoretical Framework, Home Econ. Res. J. 7, 66-75 (1978).
9.
Clulow, E.E. , Comparison of Methods of Measuring Wettability of Fabrics, and Inter-Laboratory Trials on the Method Chosen, J. Textile Inst. 60, 14-28 (1969).
10.
Garner, W., "Textile Lahoratory Manual," American Elsevier Publishing Co., N. Y., 1967, pp. 88-89.
11.
Haven, G.B., "Mechanical Fabrics," John Wiley and Sons, N. Y., 1932, pp. 317-322.
12.
Hess, K. and Readhimer, D., A Comparison of Methods for Determining the Absorption of Water by Fabrics , J. Home Econ.26 , 298-303 (1934).
13.
Holland, V.B. , A Comparison of Methods for the Determination of Water Absorbency by Terry Towels, Textile Recorder61, 38, 40, 42 (1943).
14.
Jackson, E.C. and Roper, E.R., A Water Absorbency Apparatus, Am. Dyest. Repir. 38, 397-401 (1949).
15.
Kettering, J.H., Determination of the Rate of Water Absorp tion of Light-Weight Cotton Fabrics, Am. Dyest. Reptr . 37, J73-75 (1948 ).
16.
Larose, P., The Water Absorption by Towels, Am. Dyest. Reptr . 31, 105-108, 123-124 (1942).
17.
Lichstein, B.M., Demand Wettability, A New Method for Measuring Absorbency Characteristics of Fabrics, ''Technical Symposium, Non-Woven Products Technology," 129-142 (1974).
18.
Lord, P.R., A Comparison of the.Performance of Open-End and Ring-Spun Yarns in Terry,Toweling , Textile Res. J. 44, 516-522 (1974).
19.
Preston, M.H. and Matthew, J.A., Absorption of Water by Linen: Part II—Fabrics , J. Textile Inst. 25, T371-390 (1934).
20.
Skinkle, J.H. , "Textile Testing," Chemical Publishing Co., Brooklyn, N.Y., 1949, pp. 107-109.
21.
Stevenson, L. and Lindsay, M., Methods of Testing the Absorption of Water by Cotton Towling, J. Home Econ. 18, 193-198 (1926).
