An alternative approach towards the measurement of loop length while in fabric form is proposed employing techniques of scanning electron microscopy and aerogrammetry. Distortions inherent in the recorded image have been taken into account by obtaining coordinates at intervals as determined by a micrograph of a cross-ruled grid. The lengths of all the resultant elements have been summed to obtain an estimate of the loop length, which was found to be 4–5% different from that obtained using the HATRA (Hosiery and Allied Trades Research Association, Nottingham, England) Course Length Tester. Some suggestions are offered for improving the estimated loop length by obtaining coordinates for both the face and back views of the same knitted loop. It is proposed that a similar approach would be beneficial towards an understanding of parameters governing the geometry of the knitted loop.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AinsworthT. M., B. Sc. (Hons.) Thesis, Univ. of Leeds, 1973.
2.
BoydeA., “Practical Problems and Methods in the Three-Dimensional Analysis of Scanning Electron Microscope Images,’ Proc. 3rd Annual Scanning Electron Microscope Symposium, I. I. T. Res. Inst., Chicago, Illinois, 1970, pp. 105–112.
3.
BoydeA., “A Stereo-Modelling Device for SEM Micrographs; and a Real Time 3-D System for the SEM,’ Proc. 7th Annual Scanning Electron Microscope Symposium, I. I. T. Res. Inst., Chicago, Illinois, 1974, pp. 93–100.
4.
ChatfieldE. J.MoreJ.NielsonV. H., “Stereoscopic Scanning Electron Microscopy at T. V. Scan Rates,’ Proc. 7th Annual Scanning Electron Microscope Symposium, I. I. T. Res. Inst., Illinois, 1974, pp. 117–123.
5.
EgglesonB. C.CoxM., The Geometry of Bulked Nylon Yarns in Weft-Knitted Fabrics, J. Textile Inst.55, T31–T44 (1964).
6.
GarrodR. I.NankivellJ. F., Sources of Error in Electron Stereomicroscopy, Brit. J. Appl. Phys.9, 214–218 (1958).
7.
HeidenreichR. D.MathesonL. A., Electron Microscope Determination of Surface Elevations and Orientations, J. Appl. Phys.15, 423–435 (1944).
8.
HepworthA., “The Surface Topography of Modified Wool Fibers,’ Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Leeds, 1970.
9.
HepworthA.SikorskiJ., Stereoscopy of Cylindrical Objects in the Scanning Electron Microscope, J. Microsc.98, 436–451 (1973).
10.
HepworthB.LeafG. A. V., “The Shape of the Loops in an Undeformed Plain Weft-Knitted Structure,’ Studies in Modern Fabrics (Edited by HarrisonP. W.), The Textile Institute, Manchester, 1970, pp. 181–196.
11.
HepworthB.LeafG. A. V., The Mechanics of an Idealised Weft-Knitted Structure, J. Textile Inst.67, 241–248 (1976).
12.
KnaptonJ. J. F., The Geometry and Dimensional Properties of Weft Knitted Fabric Constructions, Knitted Outerwear Times36 (41), 48–53 (1967).
13.
KnaptonJ. J. F., The Dimensional Properties of Some Wool Double-Jersey Structures in Relaxation and Laundering, J. Textile Inst.64, 128–143 (1973).
14.
LaneG. S., The Application of Stereographic Techniques to the Scanning Electron Microscope, J. Sci. Instrum., Ser. 22, 565–569 (1969).
15.
LittleT. J., “The Dimensional Properties of Double-Jersey Fabrics Made from Synthetic Yarns,’ Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Leeds, 1974.
16.
MauneD. F., “SEM Photogrammetric calibration.’ Proc. 8th Annual Scanning Electron Microscope Symposium, I. I. T. Res. Inst., Chicago, Illinois, 1975, pp. 207–215.
17.
MundenD. L., The Geometry and Dimensional Properties of Plain-Knit Fabrics, J. Textile Inst.50, T.448–471 (1959).
18.
MundenD. L.KnaptonJ. J. F.FrithC. D., Factors Affecting the Properties of Plain-Knitted Fabrics Knitted from Bulked and Stretch Yarns, J. Textile Inst.52, P488–P507 (1961).
19.
MurrayS.WhindleA. R., “Characterisation and Correction of Distortions in SEM Micrographs,’ Scanning Electron Microscopy: Systems and Applications, Conf. Ser. No. 18, Inst. of Physics, London, 1973, pp. 88–93.
20.
OsterL., “A Comparative Study of the Surface Structure of Fibres,’ M. Sc. Thesis, Univ. of Leeds, 1958.
21.
PostleR.MundenD. L., Analysis of the Dry-Relaxed Knitted-Loop Configuration, Part I: Two-Dimensional Analysis, J. Textile Inst.58, 329–351 (1967); Part II: Three-Dimensional Analysis, J. Textile Inst. 58, 352–365 (1967).
22.
ShanahanW. J.PostleR., A Theoretical Analysis of the Plain-Knitted Structure, Textile Res. J.40, 656–665 (1970).
23.
Sira Institute, Chiselhurst, Kent, England.
24.
ToveyN. K., “A General Photogrammetric Method for the Analysis of Scanning Electron Micrographs,’ Scanning Electron Microscopy: Systems and Applications, Conf. Ser. No. 18, Inst. of Physics, London, 1973, pp. 82–87.
25.
UnsworthA.HepworthA., A New Stereo-Adaptor for Use with the Scanning Electron Microscope, J. Microsc.94, 245–252 (1971).
26.
WellsO. C., Correction of Errors in Electron Stereomicroscopy, Brit. J. Appl. Phys.11, 199–201 (1960).
