Photodegradation of Flame-,Water-,Weather-,and Mildew-Resistant Cotton Tentage Fabrics

Abstract

Cotton drill was laboratory-finished with 24 combinations of the constituents commercially used in protective treatments for multi-component flame-, water-, weather-, and mildew-resistant (FWWMR) cotton tentage, and exposed for 0, 50, 150, and 250 h to carbon-arc and xenon-arc accelerated light sources. The percent loss in breaking strength of the FWWMR cotton tentage after 150 h and 250 h of light exposure was significantly greater when chlorinated paraffins were included in the finishing formulation. Antimony oxide, copper 8-quinolinolate fungicide, and C.I. Pigment Yellow 34 (lead Chromate) exhibited a protective effect on the carbon-arc exposed samples, thereby reducing the extent of photo-degradation. The carbon-arc exposed samples exhibited a significantly greater loss in strength than the xenon-arc exposed samples. Flame resistance was maintained throughout 250 h of exposure. The hydrogen ion concentration of the samples exposed 250 h to carbon-arc light was used as a measure of chemical degradation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. American Society for Testing and Materials , “1974 Book of ASTM Standards,” Philadelphia, 1974.

2. Appleby

D. K.

, The Action of Light on Textile Materials: A Review of Literature, Am. Dyest. Reptr. 38, 149–156, 189–192 (1949).

3. Atlas Electric Devices Co. , “Atlas Fade-Ometer and Weather-Ometer for Accelerated Lightfastness and Weathering Tests,” Bulletin No. 1300B, Chicago, Nov. 1974.

4. Campbell

C. W.

, President, Champion Textile Finishing Co., Chicago, Personal Letter, Feb. 26, 1975.

5. “Camping,” in Indust. Fabric Prods. Rev. 48, 18–27 (1972).

6. “Camping Manufacturers Face Further Flammability Legislation,” in Indust. Fabric Prods. Rev. 51, 30–32 (1974).

7. Canvas Products Association International , Camping Products Mfg. Division, “CPAI-84: A Specification for Flame Resistant Materials Used in Camping Tentage,” 1975.

8. Egerton

G. S.

, Mechanism of the Photochemical Degradation of Textile Materials, J. Soc. Dyers Colour. 65, 764–780 (1949).

9. Englebrecht

, Laboratory Director, American Water-proofing Corp., New Haven, Mo., Personal Letter, Feb. 25, 1975.

10.

10. Howard

J. W.

McCord

F. A.

, Cotton Quality Study. Part IV: Resistance to Weathering, Textile Res. J. 30, 75–117 (1960).

11.

11. Heffner

L. L.

, Ultraviolet Screening Properties of Certain Pigment Vehicle Combinations, Textile Res. J. 24, 272–278 (1954).

12.

12. Lyons

J. W.

, “The Chemistry and Use of Fire Retardants,” John Wiley and Sons, N. V., 1970.

13.

13. Phillips

G. O.

Arthur

J. C.

Jr. , Chemical Effects Light on Cotton Cellulose and Related Compounds. Part I: Primary Processes in Model Systems, and Part II: Photo-degradation of Cotton Cellulose, Textile Res. J. 34, 497–505 and 572–580 (1964).

14.

14. Ranby

Rabek

J. F.

, “Photodegradation, Photo-Oxidation, and Photostabilization of Polymers,” John Wiley and Sons, N. Y., 1975.

15.

15. Robinson

H. M.

Reeves

W. A.

, A Survey of the Effects of Light on Cotton and Other Cellulosic Fabrics, Am. Dyest. Reptr. 50, 1–15 (1961).

16.

16. Rulon

S. A.

Sostmann

M. J.

Phillips

I. L.

, The Permanence of Flame-Proofed Fabrics, Am. Dyest. Reptr. 35, 489–502 (1946).

17.

17. Slater

R. M.

Riley

G. C.

, Determination of the Apparent pH of Cloth, Am. Dyest. Reptr. 53, 57–58 (1963).

18.

18. “AATCC Technical Manual,” Research Triangle Park, N. C., 1975.