Limitations in Studying the Kinetics of Fabric Detergency

Abstract

The simplest expressions for the rate of removal of particulate soil from fabrics, including those for first-order kinetics, are described. Two factors militate against obtaining proportionality constants between a time function and a residual soil function which remain constant for long washing times, namely: redeposition, and heterogeneities in soil and fabric. Soil redeposition tends to lower the observed soil-removal rate. This effect can be eliminated by suitable experimental procedures. However, the inhomogeneities inherent in fabrics (fiber surface irregularities, variation in spaces between fibers and yarns) cause them to have sorption sites with a broad range of soil binding strengths. Variations in the size and shape of particles on artificial test fabrics and, for natural soil, in chemical composition as well, cause the particles to adhere to fabric substrates with bonds of different strengths. These heterogeneities produce a broad range of specific soil-removal rates whose values depend on the energies of adhesion of the particle-fabric complex. The most loosely held soil, with the highest removal rate constants, is washed off early so that the soil remaining on the fabric becomes progressively richer in the most tightly bound soil, with the smallest removal rate constants. Hence the average or observed rate constant for soil removal decreases during the washing process.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Bacon

O. C.

Smith

J. E.

, Detergent Efficiency - Interpretation of Reflectance Curves, Am. Dyestuff Reporter 43, P619–P622 (1954).

2. Benson

S. W.

, “The Foundation of Chemical Kinetics,” McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1960, pp. 623–625.

3. Durham

, The Role of Interfacial Electrical Conditions in Detergency, J. Appl. Chem. 6, 153–161 (1956).

4. Friedlander

Kennedy

J. W.

, “Introduction to Radiochemistry,” John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1949, pp. 6–7 and 204–205.

5. Goette

Kling

Mahl

, Understanding Detergency X: Electron Microscopic Examination of the Washing Process, Melliand Textilber. 35, 1252–1257 (1954).

6. Kissa

, Kinetics of Oily Soil Release, Textile Res. J. 41, 760–767 (1971).

7. Kretzschmar

, Contributions to Elucidate the Detergency Process II. Kinetics of Mass Transfer, Fette, Seifen, Anstrichm. 66, 222–225 (1964).

8. Kuffner

R. J.

Lee

T.-S.

, Probabilistic Derivation of the Kinetic Rate Equations, J. Chem. Ed. 45, 430–431 (1968).

9. Loeb

Sanford

P. B.

Cochran

S. D.

, Soil Removal as a Rate Process, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 41, 120–124 (1964).

10.

10. Schaad

L. J.

, The Monte Carlo Integration of Rate Equations, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85, 3588–3592 (1963).

11.

11. Schott

, A Kinetic Study of Fabric Detergency, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 52, 225–229 (1975).

12.

12. Strauss

, Adsorption and Desorption of Carbon Black on Cotton in Aqueous Medium, Kolloid-Z. 158, 30–33 (5958).

13.

13. Utermohlen

W. P.

Wallace

E. L.

, Detergency Studies. Part II: Washing Cloth of Various Degrees of Initial Soiling, Textile Res. J. 17, 676–681 (1947).

14.

14. Vaughn

T. H.

Vittone

Bacon

L. R.

, Properties of Detergent Solutions, Ind. Eng. Chem. 33, 1011–1019 (1941).

15.

15. Wagner

E. F.

, Sorption of Pigments on Fabrics I. Empirical Formulation of the Kinetics, Fette, Seifen, Anstrichm. 66, 696–699 (1964).

16.

16. Wagner

E. F.

, Sorption of Pigments on Fabrics II. Kinetics of Sorption, Fette, Seifen, Anstrichm. 67, 355–364 (1965).