Fabrics of printcloth weight in plain and basket weave were crosslinked with dimethylolethyleneurea to 2, 5, and 10% add-on. Specimens were dried slack or under tension before curing. The amount of crosslinking, controlled by resin pickup, produced reasonably consistent nitrogen contents in samples when other parameters were varied. Among the properties measured were fiber density, fabric thickness and area changes, fabric tensile and wrinkle recoveries, and single- fiber tenacity and tensile recovery. Relationships of properties to nitrogen contents and among various physical proper ties were frequently influenced by tension, fabric construction, and pretreatment.
Abott, N.J., The Relationship Between Fabric Structure and Ease-of-Care Performance of Cotton Fabrics, Textile Res. J.34, 1049-1082 (1964).
2.
ASTM Committee D-13, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa. (1968).
3.
(A) D 629, Tentative Methods of Quantitative Analysis of Textiles.
4.
(B) D123, Standard Definitions of Terms Relating to Textile Materials.
5.
(C) D 39, Standard General Methods of Testing Woven Fabrics.
6.
(D) D 1295, Tentative Method of Test for Recovery of Textile Fabrics From Creasing, Using the Vertical Strip Apparatus.
7.
Buck, G.S. and McCord, F.A., Crease-Resistance and Cotton, Textile Res. J.19, 216-247 (1949).
8.
Egle, C.J., Jr., Grant, J.N., and Orr, R.S., The Effects of Various Combinations of Chemical and Physical Treatments on the Physical Properties of Cotton Yarns and Bundles, Textile Res. J.37, 574-581 (1967).
9.
Frick, J.G., Jr., Gautreaux, G.A., and Reid, J.D., Wash-Wear Treatment of Highly Swollen Cotton , Textile Res. J.35, 961-962 (1965).
10.
Gagliardi, D.D. , and Gruntfest, I.J., Creasing andCrease-proofing of Textiles, Textile Res. J.20, 180-188 (1950).
Hebert, J.J. , Weiss, L.C., Orr, R.S., and Grant, J.N., Relationships of Cotton Fabric Thickness and Compressional Resilience to Wash-Wear Properties, Textile Res. J.33, 510-515 (1963).
13.
9. Honold, Edith, Private communication of unpublished data, June 1970.
14.
Linderstrøm-Lang, K., Dilatometric Ultra-Micro-Estimation of Peptidase Activity, Nature139, 713-714 (1937).
15.
Olofsson, B., Extension-Recovery Properties of Cotton Fabrics—Effects of Fiber and Cloth Characteristics, Studies of Deformation and Recovery Properties of Textile Materials, Doktorsavhandlingar vid Chalmers Tekniska Hogskola , Goteborg, Sweden, 1968. Annual Report U.S.D.A., Grant FG-Sw-108, TEFO 2:1, Goteborg, Sweden, 1967.
16.
Orr, R.S., Weiss, L.C., Moore, H.B., and Grant, J.N., Density of Modified Cottons Determined with a Gradient Column, Textile Res. J.25, 592-600 (1955).
17.
Orr, R.S., Burgis, A.W., Creely, J.J., Mares, T., and Grant, J.N., Physical Properties of Mercerized and Decrystallized Cottons. Part II: Effects of Strains During Swelling, Washing, and Drying. Textile Res. J.29, 355-363 (1959).
18.
Orr, R.S., Burgis, A.W., and Grant, J.N., Effects of Tension During Resin Treatment on Physical Properties of Cotton Fibers and Yarns, Textile Res. J.31, 550-557 (1961).
19.
Orr, R.S., Hebert, J.J., Weiss, L.C., and Grant, J.N., Effects of Tension During Crosslinking Treatments of Cotton Fabrics, Textile Res. J.34, 192-198 (1964).
20.
Orr, R.S., Hebert, J.J., Weiss, L.C., Tsoi, R.H., and Grant, J.N., Some Relations Among Fiber Properties, Fabric Crease Recovery and Other Fabric Properties for Cotton, Amer. Dyestuff Reptr.54, 896-900, 931 (1965).
21.
Steele, R. and Schiwall, R.P., Density Changes in Cellulose Treated with Urea-Formaldehyde Resins, Textile Res. J.29, 228-234 (1959).
22.
Susich, G. and Backer, S., Tensile Recovery Behavior of Textile Fibers, U. S. Quartermaster Corps Military Planning Div., Research and Development Branch, Textile Ser. Rept. No. 64, 53 pp., 1950.
