The physical “law of mixtures” and its many refinements have been extensively employed in analyses of engineering problems involving anisotropic composite materials. The plant cell wall, which is structurally a laminated composite of generally anisotropic laminae, can be analyzed in this way. The cellulosic microfibrils are considered as reinforcing filaments and the other constituents as an embedding matrix. Experimental results of mechanical tests on such cellulosic materials as wood, textile fibers, and tissue microsections can be used for comparison with elastic constants of crystalline cellulose, calculated from bending and stretching force constants of primary and secondary bonds for specific supermolecular configurations. By such means, certain configurations proposed for cellulose can be eliminated as possibilities, since, by the law of mixtures, the experimental elastic modulus of a fiber must not be greater than that calculated for the aligned, perfect cellulose crystal. Such a failure to satisfy the law of mixtures is found, for example, upon examination of a folded-chain proposal for the structure of cellulose.
AsunmaaSaara K., The Fiber Wall, Microfibrils, and Interfaces at Electron Microscopic Resolution, Tappi49, 319–324 (1966).
2.
BattistaO. A.SmithP. A., Microcrystalline cellulose. Ind. Eng. Chem. 54(9):20–39 (1962–63); see also J. Polymer Sci. C2, 152 (1963).
3.
BerlynG. P., Recent Advances in Wood Anatomy, Forest Prod. J. 14, 467–476 (1964).
4.
BetrabetS. M.DaruwallaE. H.LokhandeH. T., Intercrystalline swelling in morpholinetreated cotton cellulose. Textile Res. J. 36, 684–686 (1966).
5.
BonartR.HosemannR.MotzkusF.RuckH., X-Ray Determination of Crystallinity in High Polymeric Substances, Norelco Reptr. 7(3), 81–87, 96, 97 (1960).
6.
BudianskyB., On the Elastic Moduli of Some Heterogeneous Materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 13, 223–227 (1965).
7.
CarlssonC. A.LagergrenS., Studies on the Interfibre Bonds of Wood. Part 2: Microscopic Examination of the Zone of Failure, Svensk Papperstid. 60, 664–670 (1957).
8.
CaveI. D., The anisotropic elasticity of the plant cell wall. Submitted for publication (1968).
9.
CottrellA. H.KellyA.The Design of Strong Materials, Endeavour25, 27–32 (1966).
10.
DeBaiseG. R.PorterA. W.PentoneyR. E., Morphology and Mechanics of Wood Fracture, Mater. Res. Stds. 6, 493–499 (1966).
11.
DietzA. G. H., Design Theory of Reinforced Plastics. In “Fiberglas Reinforced Plastics,”SonnebornR. H., Ed., N. Y., Reinhold, 1954, pp. 175–206.
12.
Frey-WysslingA., On the Crystal Structure of Cellulose I, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 18, 166–168 (1955).
13.
Frey-WysslingA.MühlethalerK., “Ultra-structural Plant Cytology,”New York, Elsevier Pub. Co., 1965, pp. 34–40.
14.
GarlandH., A Microscopic Study of Coniferous Wood in Relation to its Strength Properties, Ann. Missouri Botanical Garden26, 1–95 (1939).
15.
HashinZ.RosenB. W., The Elastic Moduli of Fiber-Reinforced Materials, J. Appl. Mech. 31E, 223–232 (1964).
16.
HearleJ. W. S., The Fine Structure of Fibers and Crystalline Polymers, I; Fringed Fibril Structure. J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 7, 1175–1192 (1963).
17.
HearmonR. F. S., The Elasticity of Wood and Plywood. Dept. Sci. Ind. Res. (U.K.) Forest Prod. Spec. Rept. 7 (1948).
18.
HessK.MahlH.GütterE., Electronenmikroskopishe Darstellung grosser Langsperioden in Zellulosefasern und ihr Vergleich mit den Perioden anderer Faserarten. Kolloid-Z. 155, 1–19 (1957).
19.
HillR., Elastic Properties of Reinforced Solids. Some Theoretical Principles, J. Mech. Phys: Solids11, 357–372 (1963).
20.
HillR., Theory of Mechanical Properties of Fiber-Strengthened Materials, I: Elastic Behavior, J. Mech. Phys. Solids12, 199–212 (1964).
21.
JaswonM. A.GillisP. P.MarkR. E., The Elastic Constants of Crystalline Native Cellulose, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London)A306, 389–412 (1968).
22.
JayneB. A., Some Mechanical Properties of Wood Fibers in Tension, Forest Prod. J. 10 (6), 316–322 (1960).
23.
JentzenC. A., The Effect of Stress Applied During Drying on Some of the Properties of Individual Pulp Fibers, Tappi47 (9), 412–418 (1964); also Forest Prod. J. 14 (7), 387–392 (1964).
24.
JohnstonT. L.StokesR. J.LiC. H., Fundamental Mechanical Behavior of Composite Crystalline Mixtures, In Proc. Sixth Ord. Matls. Res. Conf. Syracuse Univ. Res. Inst., 1959, pp. 75–93.
25.
KassenbeckP.HagegeR., Contribution to the Electron-Microscope Study of the Fine Structure of Cellulose Fibers by Means of Ultramicrotomy. Textile Res. J. 38, 196–204 (1968).
26.
KeithC. T.CôtéW. A.Jr., Microscopic Characterization of Slip Lines and Compression Failures in Wood Cell Walls, Forest Prod. J. 18, (3), 67–74 (1968).
27.
KellyA., The Strengthening of Metals by Dispersed Particles, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A282, 63–79 (1964).
28.
KennedyR. W., Intra-Increment Variation and Heritability of Specific Gravity, Parallel-to-Grain Tensile Strength, Stiffness, and Tracheid Length in Clonal Norway Spruce, Tappi49, 292–296 (1966).
29.
KingE. G.Jr., Time-Dependent Strain Behavior of Wood in Tension Parallel to the Grain, Forest Prod. J. 11 (3), 156–165 (1961).
30.
KlauditzW., Zur biologisch-mechanischen Wirkung der Cellulose und Hemicellulose im Festigungsgewebe der Laubhölzer. Holzforsch. 11, (4), 110–116 (1957).
31.
KóránZ., Electron Microscopy of Radial Tracheid Surfaces of Black Spruce Separated by Tensile Failure at Various Temperatures, Tappi50, 60–67 (1967).
32.
KrässigH.KitchenW., Factors Influencing Tensile Properties of Cellulose Fibers, J. Polymer Sci. 51, 123–172 (1961).
33.
LagergrenS.RydholmS.StockmanL., Studies on the Interfibre Bonds of Wood, Svensk Papperstid60, 632–644 (1957).
34.
LekhnitskiiS. E., “Theory of Elasticity of an Anisotropic Elastic Body,” (Translated from the Russian by FernP.), San Francisco, Holden-Day, 1963, pp. 197–205.
35.
LeopoldB., Effect of Pulp Processing on Individual Fiber Strength, Tappi49, 235–240 (1966).
36.
LoveA. E. H., “A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity,” 1944 printing N. Y., Dover Pub., 1927, pp. 415–417.
37.
LyonsW. J., Theoretical Value of the Dynamic Stretch Moduli of Fiber-Forming Polymers, J. Appl. Phys. 29, 1429–1433 (1959).
38.
LyonsW. J., Theoretical Value of the Dynamic Stretch Modulus of Cellulose, J. Appl. Phys. 30, 796–797 (1959).
39.
ManleyR. S. J., The Molecular Morphology of Native Cellulose, Pioneering Res. Progr. Summary Rept. 1960–1965, Inst. Paper Chem., pp. 88–104; Nature 204, 1155–1157 (1964).
40.
MarkH., Molecular Factors Affecting Mechanical Behavior, In “Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives,”OttE., Ed., N. Y.Interscience Pub., 1943, pp. 990–1015.
41.
MarkR. E., Tensile Stress Analysis of the Cell Wall of Coniferous Tracheids, In “Cellular Ultra-structure of Woody Plants,”CôtéW. A.Jr., Ed., Syracuse Univ. Press., 1965, pp. 493–533.
42.
MarkR. E., “Cell Wall Mechanics of Tracheids,”New Haven, Conn., Yale Univ. Press, 1967, 310 pp.
43.
MeredithR., The Elastic Properties of Textile Fibers, J. Textile Inst. 37, P469–P480 (1946).
44.
MeredithR., Mechanical Properties of Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives, In “Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Cellulose and Starch,”HoneymanJ., Ed., N. Y., Interscience Pub., 1959, pp. 213–239.
45.
MeyerK. H., “Natural and Synthetic High Polymers,”N. Y.Interscience Pub., 1942, pp. 225–236.
46.
MeyerK. H.LotmarW., Sur l'Elasticité de la Cellulose, Helv. Chim. Acta19, 68–86 (1936).
47.
MeyerK. H.MischL., Positions des Atomes dans le Nouveau Modèle Spatial de la Cellulose, Helv. Chim. Acta20, 232–244 (1937).
48.
MeylanB. A., Cause of High Longitudinal Shrinkage in Wood, Forest Prod. J. 18, (4), 75–78 (1968).
49.
PerkinsR. W., Fundamental Concepts Concerning the Mechanics of Wood Deformation: Geometrical Models, Forest Prod. J. 17 (5), 59–70 (1967).
50.
PrestonR. D., Anisotropy in the Microscopic Structure of Wood, In Proc. 5th World Forestry Congr. 2, 1298–1307 (1960), Univ. Wash., Seattle.
51.
PrestonR. D., Interdisciplinary Approaches to Wood Structure, In “Cellular Ultrastructure of Woody Plants,”CôtéW. A.Jr., Ed., Syracuse Univ. Press, pp. 1–31.
52.
RånbyB. G.GrinbergB., Sur la Sorption de la Vapeur d'Eau par la Cellulose Hydrolysée et par les Micelles Isolees de Cellulose, Comptes Rendus230, 1402–1404 (1950).
53.
RosenB. W., Mechanics of Composite Strengthening, Gen. Elec. Missile & Space Div. Tech. Info. Ser. Rept. R64SD80, 1964.
54.
SakuradaI.NukushinaY.ItoT.Experimental Determination of the Elastic Modulus of Crystalline Regions in Oriented Polymers, J. Polymer Sci. 57, 651–660 (1962).
55.
SamuelssonL. G., Stiffness of Pulp Fibres, Svensk Papperstidn. 67, 905–910 (1964).
StoneJ. E., The Rheology of Cooked Wood, H. Effect of Temperature, Tappi38, 452, 459 (1955).
58.
TomlinsonG. H., The Use of Two-Phase Composite Systems in Structural Materials, Chem. Can. 17 (10): 26–28, 35 (1965).
59.
TønnesenR. S.EllefsenØ.Chain Folding—a Possibility to be Considered in Connection With the Cellulose Molecule?Norsk-Skogind14(7), 266–269 (1960).
60.
ToyA., Mechanical Properties of Beryllium Filament-Reinforced Aluminum Composites, J. Materials3(1), 43–58 (1968).
61.
TreloarL. R. G., Calculations of Elastic Moduli of Polymer Crystals. III: Cellulose, Polymer1(3) 290–303 (1960).
62.
WahlA. M., “Mechanical Springs,”2n Ed., New YorkMcGraw-Hill Pub. Co., 1963, pp. 241–257.
63.
WardropA. B., Cell Wall Organization and the Properties of the Xylem. I: Cell Wall Organization and the Variation of Breaking Load in Tension of the Xylem in Conifer Stems, Austral. J. Sci. Res. B. 4, 391–414 (1951).
64.
WardropA. B.Addo-AshongF. W., The Anatomy and Fine Structure of Wood in Relation to its Mechanical Failure, In Proc. Melbourne Univ. Eng. Dept. Sym. on Fracture, 1963. Commonwealth of Australia Div. Forest Prod. Reprint No. 560.
65.
WhitneyJ. M., Influence of Micromechanical Parameters on the Gross Properties of Fiber-Reinforced Composites, Textile Res. J. 37, 1008–1013 (1967).
66.
WhitneyJ. M., Basic Mechanics of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Materials, Textile Res. J. 371056–1062 (1967).
