Current theories explaining dry and wet wrinkle recovery in cotton, with well- documented experiments in support of each, are reviewed and observations not predicted by these theories are cited. Factors that should be considered in the develop ment of a new theory consistent with all experimental facts are presented in terms of the hydrogen-bonded structure of cotton cellulose, the modern hydrogen-bonded structure of water, and the interrelations between cotton or chemically modified cottons and water.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benerito, R.R. , McKelvey, J.B., and Berni, R.J., Textile Res. J. 36, 251-264 (1966).
2.
Berni, R.J., McKelvey. J.B., and Benerito. R.R., Textile Res. J. 37, 706-707 (1967).
3.
Chance, L.H. , Perkins, R.M., and Reeves, W.A., Textile Res. J. 31, 366-376 (1961).
4.
Cook, T.F., Roth, P.B., Salsbury, J.M., Switlyk, G., and VanLoo, W. J., Textile Res. J.27, 150-165 (1967).
5.
Falk, M., Hartmen, K.A., Jr., and Lord, R.C., J. Am. Chem. Soc.85, 387-394 (1963).
6.
Frank, H.S. and Evans, M.W., J. Chem. Phys.13, 507-532 (1945).
7.
Frank, H.S. and Wen, W.Y., Discussions Faraday Soc.24, 133-140 (1957).
8.
Frick, J.G., Jr. and Pierce, A.G. , Jr., Textile Res. J. 34, 904-906 (1964).
9.
Gardon. J.L. and Steele. R., Textile Res. J. 31, 160-171 (1961).
10.
Giguère, P.A. and Harvey, K.B., Can. J. Chem. 34, 798-808 (1956).
11.
Gillespie, R.H., Mueller, M., Swenson, H., and Ward, K., Jr., Tappi44, 662-669 (1961).
12.
Gjønnes, J. , Norman, N., and Viervoll, H., Acta Chem. Scand.12, 489 (1958).
13.
Greinacher, E., Lüttke, W., and Mecke, R., Z. Elektrochem. 59, 23-31 (1955).
Landels, G. , J. Soc.Dyers Colourists72, 137-146 (1956).
19.
Liang. C.Y. and Marchessault, R.H., J. Polymer Sci. 37, 385-395 (1959).
20.
Liang, C.Y. and Marchessault, R.H., J. Polymer Sci. 39, 269-278 (1959).
21.
Lindenbaum. S., J. Phys. Chem.70, 814-820 (1966).
22.
Lobunez, W. and Dusenbury, J.H., Textile Res. J. 18, 686-703 (1961).
23.
Loeb. L. and Segal, L., J. Polymer Sci. 14, 121-123 (1954).
24.
Marchessault, R.H. and Liang, C.Y., J. Polymer Sci. 43, 71-84 (1960).
25.
Marchi, R.P. and Eyring, H., J. Phys, Chem.68, 221-228 (1964).
26.
Marsh, J.T. , Textile Mfr.84, 527-529 (1958).
27.
Marsh, J.T. , Textile Mfr.85, 294-295 (1959).
28.
Marsh, J.T. , J. Soc.Dyers Colourists75, 244-252 (1959).
29.
Matschat, K., Textil-Rutidschan 16, 580-585 (1961).
30.
McKelvey, J.B. , Textile Res. J. 34, 486-496 (1964).
31.
McKelvey, J.B. , Benerito, R.R., and Berni, R.J., Textile Res. J. 35, 365-376 (1965).
32.
McKelvey, J.B. , Benerito, R.R., Berni, R.J., and Burgis, B.G., J. Appl.Polymer Sci.7, 1371-1389 (1963).
33.
McKelvey, J.B. , Berni. R.J., Benerito. R.R., and O'Connor , J.A., Textile Res. J. 36, 828-837 (1966).
34.
Muhlethaler, k., Zeit.Schweiz. Forstr.30, 55-65 (1960).
35.
Nelson, M.L. and O'Connor, R.T., J. Appl. Polymer Sci.8, 1325-1341 (1964).
36.
Némethy. G. and Scheraga, H.A., J. Phys. Chem.66, 1773-1789 (1962).
37.
Pauling, L. in "Hydrogen Bonding," edited by D. Hadzi, London, Pergamon, 1959, p. 1.
38.
Perkerson, F.S., Reeves, W.A., and Tripp, V.W., Textile Res. J. 30, 944-954 (1960).
39.
Philipp, H.J. , Nelson, M.L., and Ziifle, H.M., Textile Res. J. 17, 585-596 (1947).
40.
Reeves, W.A. , J. Textile Inst. 53, 22-34 (1962).
41.
Reeves, W.A. , Perkins, R.M., and Chance, L.H., Textile Res. J. 30, 179-192 (1960).
42.
Roberts, E.J. and Rowland, S.P., Can. J. Chem. 45, 261-265 (1967).
43.
Rollins, M.L. and Tripp, V.W., "Microscopical Methods for the Study of Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives, Electron Microscopy, Contribution to Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry," Vol. III. Roy W. Whistler, ed., New York, Academic Press, 1963, pp. 356-364.
44.
Schwenker, R.F. , Jr. and Lifland, L., Textile Res. J. 33, 107-117 (1963).
45.
Segal, L., Textile Res. J. 24, 861-862 (1954).
46.
Segal, L., J. Polymer Sci. 55, 395-409 (1961).
47.
Steele, R., Textile Res. J. 30, 37-46 (1960).
48.
Tesoro, G.C., J. Appl.Polymer Sci.5, 721-733 (1961).
49.
Tesoro, G.C. and Oroszlan, A., Textile Res. J. 33, 93-107 (1963).
