Wm. Scott Taggart. Cotton Spinning, V. I, P. 78 (1896). Macmillan & Co., London.
2.
A.J. Turner .The Effect of Using Unbalanced Drafts Instead of Balanced Drafts in the Spinning Preparation for Spinning Tests. Indian Central Cotton CommitteeTechnological Bulletin No. 15, P. 20, June, 1928.
3.
W. Lawrence Balls.Studies of Quality in Cotton, P. 135 (1928). Macmillan & Co., London.
4.
Report of the Cotton Research Company, July, 1921, P. 1.
5.
William King.Spinning Cotton to Count. Tex. Wld., Mar.15, 1930, P. 50.
Mordecai Ezekiel. Methods of CorrelationAnalysis , P. 15. John Wiley & Sons, New York City ( 1930).
9.
Ibid., P. 1, 3. Mean.—Edmund E. Day. Statistical Analysis . Macmillan & Co., New York (1925). E.A. Fisher.Interpretation of Quantitative Experimental Results in Textile Research. J. T. I., V. XII, Nos. 6, 7 (1921). A. J. Turner. Significance of the Results of Quantitative Textile Investigations. J. T. I., V. XIT, No. 5 (1921).
10.
Mean—. Edmund E. Day. Statistical Analysis P. 135-39. Standard Deviation—. M. Ezekiel. Methods of Correlation Analysis, P. 11. Standard Error of the Mean—. Ibid, P. 19. Standard Error of the Standard Deviation—. Ibid., P. 26. Coefficient of Variation—. F. C. Mills. Statistical Methods, P. 165. Henry Holt & Co., New York ( 1929). Standard Error of the Coefficient of Variation— . Forsyth. Muthmuatical Analysis of Statistics, P. 160. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York ( 1924).
11.
M. Ezekiel.Methods of Correlation Analysis, P. 22.
12.
Lovitt and Holtzelaw. Statistics, P. 279. Prentice-Hall.
13.
H.O. Rugg.Statistical Methods Applied to Education, P. 229.
14.
M. Ezekiel.Methods of Correlation Analysis, P. 23.