This study evaluated the comfort of three types of ballistic vests for female users: unisex flat ballistic vest, cut-and-sew ballistic vest, and darted ballistic vest. This evaluation accounted for the typical postures associated with police duty and how clothing pressure varies with these postures. The study measured the pressure acting on clothing at various body points and conducted subjective discomfort assessments among female participants wearing ballistic vests. The results revealed significant differences in clothing pressure across different body points, especially in the chest area, with these differences influenced by female physical characteristics. Posture also significantly affected clothing pressure, with shooting postures causing discomfort in the shoulders. Overall, this study underscores the practical implications of pattern design variations to fit female body shapes. By conducting a pattern analysis, the study explores the effects of pattern characteristics on clothing pressure and subjective discomfort. The findings suggest that the darted ballistic vest outperforms the other two types of ballistic vests in terms of subjective discomfort, particularly for the breast and shoulders. These findings offer valuable guidance for better meeting the comfort needs of female users with respect to ballistic vests.
PrenzlerTSinclairG.The status of women police officers: An international review. Int J Law Crime Justice2013; 41: 115-131.
2.
NayakRCrouchIKanesalingamS, et al. Body armor for stab and spike protection, Part 1: Scientific literature review. Text Res J2017; 88: 812–832.
3.
AlpyildizTRocheryMKurbakA, et al. Stab and cut resistance of knitted structures: A comparative study. Text Res J2011; 81: 205–214.
4.
TomesCOrrRMPopeR.The impact of body armor on physical performance of law enforcement personnel: A systematic review. Ann Occupat Environ Med2017; 29: 1-15.
5.
MawkhliengUMajumdarALahaA.A review of fibrous materials for soft body armour applications. RSC Adv2020; 2: 1066–1086.
6.
ZhangYDWangYLHuangY, et al. Preparation and properties of three-dimensional braided UHMWPE fiber reinforced PMMA composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2006; 25: 16011609.
7.
ChenXYangD.Use of 3D angle-interlock woven fabric for seamless female body armour, part II: Mathematical modeling. Text Res J2010; 80: 1589-1601.
8.
MoureauxBPfisterFVZijlNAV. Specially shaped multilayer armor. Patent 5943694, USA, 1999.
9.
MellianSAWatertownM.Body armor for women. Patent 4183097, USA, 1980.
10.
WeberBMillerD.Body armor with overlapping layers of ballistic material. Patent 8336112B2, USA, 2012.
11.
MulatAABruniauxPBoussuF, et al. Female seamless soft body armor pattern design system with innovative reverse engineering approaches. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2018; 98: 2271–2285.
12.
YangDChenXG.Multi-layer pattern creation for seamless front female body armor panel using angle-interlock woven fabrics. Text Res J2017; 87: 381–386.
13.
AbtewMABoussuFBruniauxP, et al. Forming characteristics and surface damages of stitched multi-layered para-aramid fabrics with various stitching parameters for soft body armour design. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2018; 109: 517-537.
14.
HaanappelSPten ThijeRHSachsU, et al. Formability analyses of uni-directional and textile reinforced thermoplastics. Composites Part A Appl Sci Manuf2014; 56: 80-92.
15.
VancloosterKLomovSVVerpoestI. On the formability of multi-layered fabric composites. In: ICCM-17, Edinburgh, 2009, pp. 1-10.
16.
ChenSEndruweitAHarperLT, et al. Forming simulations of multi-layered woven preforms assembled with stitch yarns. In: UrbaniakM (ed.), 16th European Conference of Composite Materials (ECCM16), Seville, Spain, 2014, pp. 22-26.
17.
HatchKL.Textile Science. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1993.
18.
SlaterK.1985. Human Comfort. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1985.
19.
ChenYZengXHappietteM, et al. Estimation of ease allowance of a garment using fuzzy logic. In: KahramanC (ed.), Fuzzy Applications in Industrial Engineering (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 201). Berlin: Springer, 2006, pp. 367-379.
20.
ChenYZengXYHappietteM, et al. A new method of ease allowance generation for personalization of garment design. Int J Clothing Sci Technol2008; 20: 161-173.
21.
ThomasseySBruniauxP.A template of ease allowance for garments based on a 3D reverse methodology. Int J Ind Ergon2013; 43: 406–416.
22.
ÖzdilNMarmaralıAKretzschmarSD.Effect of yarn properties on thermal comfort of knitted fabrics. Int J Therm Sci2007; 46: 1318–1322.
23.
ChenYSFanJQianX, et al. Effect of garment fit on thermal insulation and evaporative resistance. Text Res J2004; 74: 742–748.
24.
HoCFanJNewtonE, et al. Effects of athletic T-shirt designs on thermal comfort. Fibers Polym2008; 9: 503–508.
25.
MertEPsikutaABuenoMA, et al. Contribution of garment fit and style to thermal comfort at lower body. Int J Biometeorol2016; 60: 1995–2004.
26.
WangFShiWLuY, et al. Effects of moisture content and clothing fit on clothing apparent ‘wet’ thermal insulation: A thermal manikin study. Text Res J2016; 86: 57–63.
27.
Kilinc-BalciFS.How consumers perceive comfort in apparel. In:SongG (ed.), Improving Comfort in Clothing (Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles, No. 106). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2011, pp. 97–113.
28.
LiuYJChenDS.An analysis on EEG power spectrum under pressure of girdle. Int J Cloth Sci Tech2015; 27: 495–505.
29.
WongASWLiYZhangX. Influence of fabric mechanical property on clothing dynamic pressure distribution and pressure comfort on tight-fit sportswear. Sen-I Gakkaishi2004; 60: 293-299.
30.
YanmeiLWeiweiZFanJ, et al. Study on clothing pressure distribution of calf based on finite element method. J Text Instit2014; 105: 955–961.
31.
TeyemeYMalengierBTesfayeT, et al. Fit and pressure comfort evaluation on a virtual prototype of a tight-fit cycling shirt. AUTEX Res J2023; 23: 153–163.
32.
FanJChanAP.Prediction of girdle’s pressure on human body from the pressure measurement on a dummy. Int J Cloth Sci Tech2005; 17: 6–12.
33.
MakabeHMomotaHMitsunoT, et al. A study of clothing pressure developed by the girdle. J Jpn Res Assoc Textile End-uses1991; 32: 424-438.
34.
DongshengCQingZ.A study on clothing pressure for men’s suit comfort evaluation. Int J Clothing Sci Tech2003; 15: 320–334.
35.
YouFWangJMLuoXN, et al. Garment’s pressure sensation (1): Subjective assessment and predictability for the sensation. Int J Cloth Sci Tech2002; 14: 307–316.
36.
YouFWangJMLuoXN, et al. Garment’s pressure sensation (2): The psychophysical mechanism for the sensation. Int J Cloth Sci Tech2002; 14: 317–327.
37.
TsujisakaTAzumaYMatsumotoY, et al. Comfort pressure of the top part of men’s socks. Text Res J2004; 74: 598–602.
38.
KamalhaEZengYMwasiagiJI, et al. The comfort dimension; a review of perception in clothing. J Sens Stud2013; 28: 423–444.
39.
ZhuCLLongWYingBA, et al. Finite element simulation of the dynamic pressure distribution of a typical compression sports bra during wearing. J Fiber Bioeng Inform2020; 13: 211–219.
40.
YanXHWangLJWangML, et al. Analysis of pressure distribution during movement for the top part of female socks. Text Res J2020; 90: 1301–1310
41.
BarhoumiHMarzouguiSAbdessalemSB.A novel design approach and ergonomic evaluation of Class I compression legging. Int J Cloth Sci Technol2022; 34: 273–284
42.
KirkWIbrahimS.Fundamental relationship of fabric extensibility to anthropometric requirements and garment performance. Text Res J1966; 36: 37–47.
43.
YuWFanJTQianXM.A soft mannequin for the evaluation of pressure garments on human body. Sen’i Gakkaishi2004; 60: 57–64.
44.
YanYTsaiPP. Prediction of hydrostatic pressure and blood penetration of medical protective clothing. J Eng Fibers Fabr2016; 11: 155892501601100104.
45.
LeeYHongK.Development of indirect method for clothing pressure measurement using three-dimensional imaging. Text Res J2016; 83: 1594–1605.
46.
RandolphAL. Methods of processing cylinder-pressure transducer signals to maximize data accuracy. SAE Trans1990: 191–200.
47.
JinZChenDYangY. Research of effect of ergonomics on athletic shoes and costume design project. In: WangJQinY (eds.), International Conference on Education Technology Management and Humanities Science. China: Atlantis Press, 2015, pp. 217–220.
48.
MitalAKilbomÅKumarS (eds.). Ergonomics Guidelines and Problem Solving. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000.
49.
das NevesÉPBrigattoACPaschoarelliLC.Fashion and ergonomic design: Aspects that influence the perception of clothing usability. Procedia Manuf2015; 3: 6133–6139.
50.
ChunyanQYueHU. Design of outdoor sports monitoring function cycling jerseys. Eur J Bus Soc Sci2015; 4: 180-189.
51.
De RaeveAVasileS. Adapted performance sportswear. In: D’Apuzzo(ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on 3D Body Scanning Technology. Lugano, Switzerland: Hometrica Consulting, 2016, pp. 9–15.
52.
HassanMQashqaryKHassanHA, et al. Influence of sportswear fabric properties on the health and performance of athletes. Fibres Text East Eur2012; 4: 82–88.
53.
ParkHBransonDKimS, et al. Effect of armor and carrying load on body balance and leg muscle function. Gait Posture2014; 39: 430-435.
54.
AshbyPJCIremongerMJGottsPL. The trade-off between protection and performance for dismounted infantry in the assault. In: Personal Armour Systems Symposium 2004, TNO Prins Maurits Laboratory, Rijswijk, The Netherlands, 7–10 September2004.
55.
HudsonSRidlandLBlackburnJ, et al. The comfort and functional performance of personal protective equipment for police officers: A systematic scoping review. Ergonomics2024; 67(10): 1317-1337. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2024.2302957.
56.
ColtmanCESteeleJRSpratfordWA, et al. Are female soldiers satisfied with the fit and function of body armour?Appl Ergon2020; 89: 103197.
57.
ChoiHJBlake MitchellKGarlieT, et al. Effects of body armor fit on marksmanship performance. In: GoonetillekeRKarwowskiW (eds.) Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors: Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors. New York: Springer, 2016, pp. 341–354.
58.
CohenJ.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd edn.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1988.
59.
LiuHChenDWeiQ, et al. An investigation into the bust girth range of pressure comfort garment based on elastic sports vest. J Text Inst2013; 104: 223-230.
60.
LentonGKDoyleTLSaxbyDJ, et al. Integrating a hip belt with body armour reduces the magnitude and changes the location of shoulder pressure and perceived discomfort in soldiers. Ergonomics2018; 61: 566-575.
