Abstract
Optimizing thermal comfort for gloves requires precise predictions of localized thermal resistance (Rct), yet traditional experimental methods are costly and limited in capturing complex interactions. This study developed a computational framework employing Bayesian-optimized machine learning models, including multiple linear regression (MLR), decision tree (DT), generalized additive model (GAM), support vector regression (SVR), and deep learning (DL), to predict localized Rct of firefighting gloves. Utilizing 1680 measurements from firefighting gloves, predictive accuracy and stability were evaluated. DL demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy (R² = 0.924690, mean absolute error [MAE] = 0.009970), closely followed by SVR (R² = 0.913098, MAE = 0.011209) and GAM (R² = 0.909959, MAE = 0.011472), whereas DT and MLR exhibited lower accuracy. Response surface analysis revealed that GAM provides consistent and interpretable predictions in sparse data contexts; DL captures detailed, complex interactions but requires careful management of potential overfitting; SVR represents an intermediate choice, balancing nonlinear accuracy with smoothness but still vulnerable to occasional nonphysical predictions in sparse data scenarios. Key predictors were air layer thickness, glove thickness, wind speed, glove section, and surface area. Thermal resistance increased consistently with air layer thickness, whereas higher wind speeds reduced insulation. Predictions highlighted the little finger as the most critical region, with Rct decreasing from 0.145 to 0.112 K m2/W as the wind speed increased from 0 to 2 m/s. Future studies should incorporate experimental validation under realistic firefighting scenarios, expand dataset diversity, and apply physically constrained models to enhance prediction robustness.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
