Achieving an optimal balance between user-perceived support and overall comfort remains a key challenge in knee brace design. This study applied a multicriteria decision-making approach, integrating the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and PROMETHEE (preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation), to evaluate three spacer-fabric-based brace designs with different aperture shapes: no hole, circular hole, and keyhole. All evaluation criteria were defined from the perspective of subjective user comfort, including sensations of support, breathability, heat, skin irritation, movement restriction, and joint feedback. AHP results showed that participants, after being sensitized to the definitions, prioritized support and stability (35%) and joint feedback (30%), indicating a desire for perceived functional benefit during use. PROMETHEE rankings revealed that the keyhole design achieved the highest overall preference score, offering the best balance between perceived support and comfort. The no hole design ranked second as it was particularly valued for its perceived support, while the circular hole design ranked lowest due to weaker user perception across most criteria.
PereiraSAnandSRajendranS, et al.
A study of the structure and properties of novel fabrics for knee braces. J Ind Text2007;
36(4): 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083707072357.
KingLKKendzerskaTWaughEJ, et al.
Impact of osteoarthritis on difficulty walking: A population-based study. Arthritis Care Res2018;
70: 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23250.
4.
Pérez-SorianoPGarcía-RoigÁSanchis-SanchisR, et al.
Influence of compression sportswear on recovery and performance: A systematic review. J Ind Text2019;
8(9): 1505–1524. https://doi:10.1177/1528083718764912.
5.
BeaudreuilJBendayaSFaucherM, et al.
Clinical practice guidelines for rest orthosis, knee sleeves, and unloading knee braces in knee osteoarthritis. Joint Bone Spine2009;
76(6): 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2009.02.002
6.
AlbaughLMcCannJYaoL, et al. Engineering multifunctional spacer fabrics through machine knitting. Proc CHI Conf Hum Factors Comput Syst. 2021;
498: 1–12. Yokohama, Japan: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445564.
7.
PierratBMillotCMolimardJ, et al.
Characterisation of knee brace migration and associated skin deformation during flexion by full-field measurements. Exp Mech2015;
55: 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-014-9947-2.
8.
SquyerEStamperDLHamiltonDT, et al.
Unloader knee braces for osteoarthritis: Do patients actually wear them?. Clin Orthop Relat Res2013;
471: 1982–1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2814-0.
9.
RingenbachPYuAZhangY.Analysis of knee-bending motion through three-dimensional scanning for advanced brace design. Text Res J2024;
94((23–24):): 2682–2694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517524125614.
RingenbachPYuASakumaA.Digital image correlation for measuring strain concentration and distribution mechanics in holed spacer fabrics for knee brace applications. Int J Mech Mater Des2025;
21: 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-025-09743-x.
SaatyTL.Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. RWS publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994.
15.
SaatyTL.Theory and applications of the analytic network process: decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. RWS publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 2005.
16.
IshizakaALabibA.Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst Appl2011;
38(11): 14336–14345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143
MitraA.Selection of Khadi fabrics for optimal comfort properties using multi-criteria decision-making technique. Res J Text Apparel2023;
27(1): 118–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/RJTA-08-2021-0108.
19.
IftikharFAliZHussainT, et al.
A multi-criteria decision-making approach for woven fabric selection and grading for ladies summer apparel. J Nat Fibers2019;
18(10): 1481–1490. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2019.1691123.
20.
BransJP. L’ingénierie de la décision. Elaboration d’instrument d’aide à la décision. In: Nadeau R and Landry M (eds), Méthode PROMETHEE, L’aide à la décision. Nature, instruments et perspectives d’avenir, 1982, 183–213, Presses de l’Université Laval, Québec.
21.
BransJPVinckeP.A preference ranking organisation method (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making). Manag Sci1985;
31: 647–656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647.
BransJPVinckePHMareschallB.How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. Eur J Op Res1986;
14: 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5.
24.
BehzadianMKazemzadehRBAlbadviA, et al.
PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur J Op Res2010;
200: 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021.
25.
MacharisCSpringaelJDe BruckerK, et al.
PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP, Eur J Op Res2004;
153: 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00153-X.
26.
BransJPMareschalB.Promethee Methods. In: Greco S, Ehrgott M and Figueira JR (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol. 78. New York, NY: Springer, 2005, pp. 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23081-5_5.
27.
WangJJYangDL.Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing. Comput Oper Res2007;
34(12): 3691–3700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2006.01.017.
28.
AksütGErenTAlakaşHM.Using wearable technological devices to improve workplace health and safety: An assessment on a sector base with multi-criteria decision-making methods, Ain Shams Eng J2024;
15(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102423.
29.
PayakpateJSrisawatC.Using analytical hierarchy process for selecting intercrop in rubber field - A case study in Phitsanulok, Thailand. IJACST2014;
3: 11–15.
30.
WangJYangJHuangX, et al.
The effect of knee braces on knee joint kinematics at different exercise speeds. Sports Biomech2024;
23(12): 3526–3537. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2024.2409656
