Improper compression bandage application can result in ineffective edema management, leading to pain and decreased patient adherence to treatment. The successful application depends on the operator’s experience, bandage overlap, and applied tension. In addition, the bandages’ structural properties are essential for sustained compression. This study investigates how compression bandage structure influences slippage, leg conformity, and therapeutic pressure application. It focuses on the effect of intermeshing, stiffness, and design for pressure consistency, comparing a dual compression system (DCS) with a traditional two-layer bandage (TLB). The DCS includes visual indicators to help practitioners achieve target pressure through proper extension and overlap. Methods involved a bench test, photographic microscopy, and a preliminary nonclinical study. The bench test evaluated bandage slippage and subbandage pressure using a leg model, photographic microscopy examined bandage intermeshing, and the nonclinical study assessed the effectiveness of the visual indicators in assisting nurses in achieving a target pressure of 40 ± 10 mmHg. Results showed that the TLB did not conform to the leg model after a 4 cm circumference reduction and significantly decreased stiffness after a 2 cm reduction (P < 0.05). In contrast, the DCS maintained its stiffness and conformed to the simulated leg despite the reduction in circumference. The nonclinical study revealed that nurses with no prior experience performed more effectively with the DCS after online training, while an experienced TLB nurse demonstrated proficiency with the DCS following both online and in-person training. This study emphasizes the importance of understanding bandage stretch properties to achieve the appropriate pressure levels, thus optimizing compression effectiveness.
NelsonEABell‐SyerSE. Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014;
2014(9): CD002303.
2.
MayrovitzHNDelgadoMSmithJ.Compression bandaging effects on lower extremity peripheral and sub-bandage skin blood perfusion. Ostomy/Wound Managem1998;
44: 56–60, 2, 4 passim.
3.
NicklesMAEnnisWJO’DonnellTFJrAltmanIA.Compression therapy in peripheral artery disease: a literature review. J Wound Care2023;
32: S25–S30.
4.
ZarchiKJemecGB.Delivery of compression therapy for venous leg ulcers. JAMA Dermatol2014;
150: 730–736.
5.
PartschHClarkMMostiG, et al.
Classification of compression bandages: practical aspects. Dermatol Surg2008;
34: 600–609.
6.
HaeslerEFrescosNRaynerR.The fundamental goal of wound prevention: recent best evidence. Wound Pract Res J Austral Wound Manage Assoc2018;
26: 14–22.
7.
PartschHMortimerP.Compression for leg wounds. Br J Dermatol2015;
173: 359–369.
8.
AndriessenAApelqvistJMostiGPartschHGonskaCAbelM.Compression therapy for venous leg ulcers: risk factors for adverse events and complications, contraindications–a review of present guidelines. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol2017;
31: 1562–1568.
9.
RabeEPartschHMorrisonN, et al.
Risks and contraindications of medical compression treatment–A critical reappraisal. An international consensus statement. Phlebology2020;
35: 447–460.
10.
ChitambiraF.Patient perspectives: explaining low rates of compliance to compression therapy. Wound Pract Res J Austral Wound Manage Assoc2019;
27: 168–174.
11.
MilicDJZivicSSBogdanovicDC, et al.
The influence of different sub-bandage pressure values on venous leg ulcers healing when treated with compression therapy. J Vasc Surg2010;
51: 655–661.
12.
O’MearaSCullumNNelsonEADumvilleJC. Compression for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2012; 14; 11(11): CD000265.
13.
HopkinsAWorboysF.Understanding compression therapy to achieve tolerance. Wounds UK2005;
1: 26.
14.
ClarkM.Compression bandages: Principles and definitions. Position Document of the European Wound Management Association (EWMA).
London:
Medical Education Partnership Ltd, 2003: pp. 2–4.
15.
SikkaMGargSKumariN. Bandages (compression, retention, and support). In Textile Materials for Good Health and Wellbeing: Design and Applications. New York: Springer, 2024, pp. 155-170.
16.
AboalasaadARSirkováBKBíláPKhalilAA.Comparative study of long-and short-stretch woven compression bandages. Autex Res J2021;
21: 435–444.
17.
KankariyaN.Material, structure, and design of textile-based compression devices for managing chronic edema. J Indust Text2022;
52: 15280837221118844.
18.
LiuRGuoXLaoTTLittleT.A critical review on compression textiles for compression therapy: textile-based compression interventions for chronic venous insufficiency. Text Res J2017;
87: 1121–1141.
19.
SantandreaSBenassiMTedeschiR.Comparison of short-stretch bandage and long-stretch bandage for post-traumatic hand edema. Int J Surg Case Rep2023;
111: 108854.
20.
OlszewskiWaldemarL.The effectiveness of intermittent pneumatic compression in long-term therapy of lymphedema of lower limbs. Lymph Res Biol2014;
12(2): 103–9.
21.
StoutNPartschHSzolnokyG, et al.
Chronic edema of the lower extremities: international consensus recommendations for compression therapy clinical research trials. Int Angiol2012;
31: 316.
22.
TennisonJMFuJBBrueraE.Improvement of refractory peripheral edema with multilayered compression bandaging: a case report. Phys Ther2018;
98: 763–766.
23.
MoffattC.Variability of pressure provided by sustained compression. Int Wound J2008;
5: 259–265.
24.
MoffattCJEdwardsLCollierM, et al.
A randomised controlled 8‐week crossover clinical evaluation of the 3M™ Coban™ 2 Layer Compression System versus Profore™ to evaluate the product performance in patients with venous leg ulcers. Int Wound J2008;
5: 267–279.
25.
HirateHSobueKTsudaTKatsuyaH.Peripheral nerve injury caused by misuse of elastic stockings. Anaesthesia Intensive care2007;
35: 306–308.
26.
WelshL.What is the existing evidence supporting the efficacy of compression bandage systems containing both elastic and inelastic components (mixed‐component systems)? A systematic review. J Clin Nurs2017;
26: 1189–1203.
27.
JüngerMLadwigABohbotSHaaseH.Comparison of interface pressures of three compression bandaging systems used on healthy. J Wound Care2009;
18: 474–480.
28.
ChassagneFMartinFBadelPConvertRGirauxPMolimardJ.Experimental investigation of pressure applied on the lower leg by elastic compression bandage. Ann Biomed Eng2015;
43: 2967–77.
SikkaMGhoshSMukhopadhyayA.The structural configuration and stretch property relationship of high stretch bandage fabric. Fibers Polym2014;
15: 1779–1785.
31.
ThomasS.The use of the Laplace equation in the calculation of sub-bandage pressure. EWMA J2003;
3: 21–23.
32.
ThomasS.Variability in the reported accuracy of sub-bandage pressure measuring devices: A consequence of the use of inappropriate validation techniques. Phlebology2022;
37: 400–401.
33.
WoldmanAKanetiNCarmeliE.Evaluation of pressure-applying accuracy in multilayer bandaging among physiotherapists who treat lymphedema. Lymph Res Biol2018;
16: 453–457.
34.
HaraHHamanakaNYoshidaM, et al.
Variability in compression pressure of multi-layer bandaging applied by lymphedema therapists. Support Care Cancer2019;
27: 959–963.
35.
HaraHYoshidaMIkehataN, et al.
Compression pressure variability in upper limb multilayer bandaging applied by lymphedema therapists. Lymph Res Biol2021;
19: 378–382.
36.
TaylorATaylorRSaidS.Using a bandage pressure monitor as an aid in improving bandaging skills. J Wound Care1998;
7: 131–133.
37.
KellerAMüllerMLCalowTKernIKSchumannH.Bandage pressure measurement and training: simple interventions to improve efficacy in compression bandaging. Int Wound J2009;
6: 324–330.
38.
HafnerJLüthiWHänssleHKammerlanderGBurgG.Instruction of compression therapy by means of interface pressure measurement. Dermatol Surg2000;
26: 481–488.
39.
Arias-GuzmanSObergCJonesRCallE.Comparing the energy-stretch properties of two compression bandage systems in a laboratory-based test under controlled conditions. Adv Skin Wound Care2022;
35: 605–612.
40.
TaiHQChaenLCRBoeyJ, et al.
A dual pressure indicator, two-layer compression system for treatment of venous leg ulcers: a review. J Wound Care2021;
30: S6–S12.
41.
ChaudharyBLyngdohGAOwensJDasSMatosH.An investigation into the electromechanical performance of textile fabrics with conductive yarn elements for data transfer capabilities. Text Res J2024: 00405175241242139.
42.
LarsenAMFuttrupI.Watch the pressure–it drops. EWMA J2004;
4: 8–12.
43.
FebenK.How effective is training in compression bandaging technique?Br J Commun Nursing2003;
8: 80–84.
44.
HamptonSCollinsF.Tissue Viability.
New York:
John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
45.
SatpathyAHayesSDoddsS.Measuring sub-bandage pressure: comparing the use of pressure monitors and pulse oximeters. J Wound Care2006;
15: 125–128.
