The textile-processing industry is accountable for the significant use and contamination of freshwater resources. The textile industry needs to review and improve its current water consumption practices due to increased consumer knowledge of environmental regulations regarding freshwater contamination. One very interesting alternative that could help to create a more sustainable future is the foam-dyeing technique. This review paper examines the recent advancements in foam-dyeing technology, highlighting its benefits over traditional techniques, including lower energy and water consumption as well as less need for chemicals and dyes. The configuration of foam makes it possible to apply dyes more successfully, thus decreasing both the amount of dye used and the processing time. Additionally, compared to traditional processing technologies, foam-dyeing methods use less energy because they require a lower dyeing temperature. This study also emphasizes the current studies on foam dyeing on a variety of textile substrates, including cotton, polyester, and their blends, as well as on fibers, yarns, and fabrics. Additionally, a techno-economical comparison between conventional dyeing and foam dyeing is provided. This review paper additionally endorses Sustainable Development Goal 6 (clean water and sanitation) by examining the preservation of usable water and the decrease in wastewater discharge through foam-dyeing technology.
BhandariNRayesJAGLonaLR, et al.
Barriers to sustainable sourcing in the apparel and fashion luxury industry. Sustain Prod2022;
31: 2022.
2.
LowWThinTYongLY, et al.
Assessment of red and white clay evaporative rate in simulating perspiration with textile. J Eng Sci Technol2023;
18: 3128–3139.
3.
MeenaJSChoiSBJungS-B, et al.
Electronic textiles: new age of wearable technology. Mater Today Bio2023;
19: 100565.
4.
PengXUmerMPervezMN, et al.
Biopolymers-based microencapsulation technology for sustainable textiles development: a short review. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng2023;
7: 100349. doi:10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100349.
5.
ManaiaJCerejoF, andDuarteJ.Revolutionising textile manufacturing: a comprehensive review on 3D and 4D printing technologies. Fash Text2023;
10: 20. doi:10.1186/s40691-023-00339-7.
6.
TsolisABakogianniSAngelakiC, et al.
A review of clothing components in the development of wearable textile antennas: design and experimental procedure. Sensors2023;
23: 3289. doi:10.3390/s23063289.
7.
AlkayaEDemirerGN.Sustainable textile production: a case study from a woven fabric manufacturing mill in Turkey. J Clean Prod2014;
65: 595–603. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.008.
ŠajinN. Environmental impact of the textile and clothing industry: what consumers need to know. European Parliamentary Research Service, January 2019.
10.
ShafiqFSiddiqueAPervezMN, et al.
Extraction of natural dye from aerial parts of Argy wormwood based on optimized Taguchi approach and functional finishing of cotton fabric. Materials2021;
14: 5850. doi:10.3390/ma14195850.
11.
HussainT.Textile processing. In: NawabY (ed) Textile engineering: an introduction.
Berlin:
CPI Books GmbH, 2016, pp. 83–108.
12.
SaxenaARajaSArputharajA.Challenges in wet processing of textiles. In: MuthiS (ed) Textiles and clothing sustainability.
Singapore:
Springer, 2017, pp.43–79.
13.
DobilaitėVAlišauskienėMSacevičienėV.Study of textile waste generation and treatment in Lithuania. Fibres Text East Eur2017;
25: 8–13. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0010.5360.
14.
NaeemJSiddiqueA.Sustainable consumption and production trends of textiles and apparel industry in Pakistan. In: Sadhna, KumarRMemonHGreeshmaS (eds) Consumption and production in the textile and garment industry: a comparative study among Asian countries.
Singapore:
Springer Nature Singapore, 2024, pp.17–32. doi:10.1007/978-981-97-6577-5_2.
15.
AhmadSAshrafMAbidS, et al.
Recent developments in laser fading of denim: a critical review. J Nat Fibers2022;
19: 11621–11631.
16.
TongOShaoSZhangY, et al.
An AHP-based water-conservation and waste-reduction indicator system for cleaner production of textile-printing industry in China and technique integration. Clean Technol Environ Policy2012;
14: 857–868. doi:10.1007/s10098-012-0453-x.
17.
PetekJGlavicP.An integral approach to waste minimization in process industries. Conserv Recycl1996;
17: 169–188. doi:10.1016/0921-3449(96)01151-2.
18.
ZhengHZhangJYanJ, et al.
An industrial scale multiple supercritical carbon dioxide apparatus and its eco-friendly dyeing production. J CO2 Util2016;
16: 272–281. doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2016.08.002.
19.
HussainTWahabA.A critical review of the current water conservation practices in textile wet processing. J Clean Prod2018;
198: 806–819. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.051.
20.
LuXLiuLLiuR, et al.
Textile wastewater reuse as an alternative water source for dyeing and finishing processes: a case study. Desalination2010;
258: 229–232. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.002.
21.
AzanawABirlieBTeshomeB, et al.
Case report: textile effluent treatment methods and eco-friendly resolution of textile wastewater. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng2022;
6: 100230.
22.
KantR.Textile dyeing industry an environmental hazard. Nat Sci2012;
4: 22–26. doi:10.4236/ns.2012.41004.
23.
PangYLAbdullahAZ.Current status of textile industry wastewater management and research progress in Malaysia: a review. Clean (Weinh)2013;
41: 751–764. doi:10.1002/clen.201000318.
24.
TüfekciNSivriNTorozI.Pollutants of textile industry wastewater and assessment of its discharge limits by water quality standards. Turkish J Fish Aquat Sci2007;
103: 97–103.
25.
HasanbeigiA. Energy-efficiency improvement opportunities for the textile industry. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2010, 136.
26.
GleickPHHaaszDHenges-JeckC, et al. Waste not, want not: the potential for urban water conservation. Pacific Institute, November 2003.
27.
KhatriAPeerzadaMMohsinM, et al.
A review on developments in dyeing cotton fabrics with reactive dyes for reducing effluent pollution. J Clean Prod2015;
87: 50–57. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.017.
28.
BurkinshawSSalihuG.The role of auxiliaries in the immersion dyeing of textile fibres: Part 4 theoretical model to describe the role of liquor ratio in dyeing cellulosic fibres with direct dyes in the absence and presence of inorganic electrolyte. Dye Pigment2017;
8: 52.
29.
HussainTTausifMAshrafM.A review of progress in the dyeing of eco-friendly aliphatic polyester-based polylactic acid fabrics. J Clean Prod2015;
108: 476–483. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.126.
30.
XieKChengFZhaoW, et al.
Micelle dyeing with low liquor ratio for reactive dyes using dialkyl maleic acid ester surfactants. J Clean Prod2011;
19: 332–336. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.10.006.
31.
NieminenELinkeMToblerM, et al.
EU COST Action 628: life cycle assessment (LCA) of textile products, eco-efficiency and definition of best available technology (BAT) of textile processing. J Clean Prod2007;
15: 1259–1270. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.011.
32.
ÖnerESahinbaskanB.A new process of combined pretreatment and dyeing: REST. J Clean Prod2011;
19: 1668–1675. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.05.008.
33.
AbadteMTTadeseMG.Airflow, foam, and supercritical carbon dioxide dyeing technologies. In: RatherLJHajiAShabbirM (eds) Innovative and emerging technologies for textile dyeing and finishing.
Beverly, MA:
Scrivener Publishing LLC, 2011, pp. 137–164.
34.
BickermanJJ.Foams.
New York:
Springer-Verlag, 2013.
35.
ElbadawiAMPearsonJS.Foam technology in textile finishing. Text Prog2003;
33: 1–31. doi:10.1080/00405160308688960.
36.
HoqueEAcharyaSShamshinaJ, et al.
Review of foam applications on cotton textiles. Text Res J2023;
93: 486–501.
37.
WangHGuoWZhengC, et al.
Effect of temperature on foaming ability and foam stability of typical surfactants used for foaming agent. J Surfactants Deterg2017;
20: 615–622. doi:10.1007/s11743-017-1953-9.
38.
YuHWangYZhongY.Foam properties and application in dyeing cotton fabrics with reactive dyes. Color Technol2014;
130: 266–272. doi:10.1111/cote.12088.
39.
ShaoyuCChaoxiaWLiangF.A novel strategy for realizing environmentally friendly pigment foam dyeing using polyoxyethylene surfactant C14EO5 as foam controller. Color Technol2017;
133: 253–261.
40.
MohsinMSardarSAkhtarKS, et al.
Performance enhancement of water and energy efficient foam dyeing and finishing though different foaming agents. J Nat Fibers2023;
20.
41.
DenkovND.Mechanisms of foam destruction by oil-based antifoams. Langmuir2004;
20: 9463–9505. doi:10.1021/la049676o.
42.
KohJ.Dyeing of cellulosic fibres: In: ClarkM (ed) Handbook of textile and industrial dyeing.
Cambridge:
Woodhead Publishing, 2011, pp.129–146.
NamboodriCG.Foam sizing of cotton and blend yarns: slashing trials. Text Res J1986;
56: 87–92. doi:10.1177/004051758605600203.
46.
LambertAHHarperRJ.Cross linking single side cotton, via foam finishing to produce garment dyeable fabrics. J Coat Fabr1990;
19: 169–180. doi:10.1177/152808379001900305.
47.
BhavsarPSZoccolaMPatruccoA, et al.
Superheated water hydrolyzed keratin: a new application as a foaming agent in foam dyeing of cotton and wool fabrics. ACS Sustain Chem Eng2017;
5: 9150–9159. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02064.
48.
FariasLT.Progress in chemical foam technology for dyeing applications. AATCC Rev2013;
13: 36–41.
49.
ShangSHuEPoonP.Foam dyeing for developing wash out effect on cotton knitted fabrics with pigment. Res J Text Appar2011;
15: 44–51. doi:10.1108/RJTA-15-01-2011-B005.
50.
MagdaMKamelSShakraS, et al. Foam dyeing with vat dyes. Am Dye Rep1997;
86: 35–41.
51.
WangQZhouWDuS, et al. Application of foam dyeing technology on ultra-fine polyamide filament fabrics with acid dye. Text Res J2019;
89: 4808–4816.
52.
ChenSFeiLGeF, et al.
A versatile and recycled pigment foam coloring approach for natural and synthetic fibers with nearly-zero pollutant discharge. J Clean Prod2020;
243: 10675–10688.
53.
ShakraSHannaHLKharadlyEA.Foam dyeing with reactive dyes and its effect on the fastness properties of dyeings. Am Dye Rep1989;
78: 60.
54.
BhavsarPSZoccolaMPatruccoA, et al.
Superheated water hydrolyzed keratin: a new application as a foaming agent in foam dyeing of cotton and wool fabrics, ACS Sustain Chem Eng2017;
5: 9150–9159. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02064.
55.
BerendtHUSchaferP. Process for dyeing or printing cellulose-containing textile material with vat dye foam. Patent 4613335-A, USA, 1986.
56.
AurichCWZeifferDFNeupertHA. Apparatus for dyeing textile substrates with foamed dye. Patent 2008/147515-AI, Switzerland, 2008.
57.
MalpassHTharpeREthridgeMD. Indigo dyeing fabrics, process and apparatus and indigo dyed yarns and made thereby. Patent 10619292-B2, USA, 2020.
58.
HutzlerSCoxSJWangG.Foam drainage in two dimensions. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp2005;
263: 178–183. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.02.001.
59.
SivaMRamamurthyKDhamodharanR.Sodium salt admixtures for enhancing the foaming characteristics of sodium lauryl sulphate. Cem Concr Compos2015;
57: 133–141. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.12.011.
60.
SunLWangBPuW.The effect of foam stability on foam flooding recovery. Pet Sci Technol2015;
33: 15–22. doi:10.1080/10916466.2014.922100.
61.
WangJNguyenAVFarrokhpayS.A critical review of the growth, drainage and collapse of foams. Adv Colloid Interface Sci2016;
228: 55–70. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2015.11.009.
62.
SarwarNMohsinMBhattiAA, et al.
Development of water and energy efficient environment friendly easy care finishing by foam coating on stretch denim fabric. J Clean Prod2017;
154: 159–166. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.171.
63.
MaoZYuHWangY.States of water and pore size distribution of cotton fibers with different moisture ratios. Ind Eng Chem Res2014;
53: 8927–8934. doi:10.1021/ie501071h.
64.
MohsinMShaheenS.Multi-criteria decision analysis for textile pad-dyeing and foam-dyeing based on cost, performance, productivity and sustainability. Cellulose2019;
26: 4143–4157. doi:10.1007/s10570-019-02337-9.
65.
ChoudhuryAKR.Dyeing of synthetic fibres. In: ClarkM (ed) Handbook of textile and industrial dyeing.
Cambridge:
Woodhead Publishing, 2011, pp. 40–128.
66.
AbrahamsGADouglasDH. Foam dyeing process, US Patent 3762860, assigned to Dexter Chemical Corporation, 1973.
67.
MohsinMShaheenS.Development of sustainable and cost efficient textile foam finishing and its comparison with conventional padding. Cellulose2020;
27: 4091–4107. doi:10.1007/s10570-020-03033-9.
68.
SongMHouJLuY, et al.
Performance of foam and application in foam finishing of textile. Adv Mater Res2013;
821–822: 661–664. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.821-822.661.
69.
Van Der WaltGHJVan ResenburgNJJ.Low liquor dyeing and finishing. Text Prog2009;
14: 1–50.
70.
CapponiMFlisterAHaslerR, et al.
Foam technology in textile processing. Rev Prog Color1982;
12: 48–57. doi:10.1111/j.1478-4408.1982.tb00225.x.
71.
KumarPSYaashikaaP R.Sustainable dyeing techniques. In: MuthuS (ed) Sustainable innovations in textile chemical processes.
Singapore:
Springer, 2018, pp. 1–29.
72.
PaulR.Functional finishes for textiles improving comfort, performance and protection.
Cambridge:
Woodhead Publishing, 2015.
73.
AfrazNSardarSMohsinM, et al.
Performance enhancement of reactive foam dyeing for cotton fabric through different foaming agents and stabilizers. Pigment Resin Technol. Epub ahead of print 13 July 2024. doi:10.1108/PRT-11-2023-0107.
