To determine the conditions of Terg-O-Tometer (a laboratory-scale test washing machine) that match the cleaning performance in real households, this study compares the detergency performances of a vertical washing machine and a Terg-O-Tometer on cotton and chemical fibers. Consistent with previous studies, the detergency of the Terg-O-Tometer matched that of the vertical washing machine at a rotation speed of 100 rpm for cotton cloth. However, when tested on polyester/cotton blend cloth, the matching rotation speed was 40–80 rpm, depending on the dirt on the fibers. These disparate results are attributed to differences in the frictional force between the cloths generated in the vertical washing machine and Terg-O-Tometer, and to differences in the underwater flexibilities of cotton soiled cloth and polyester/cotton blend cloth.
YamadaI.Survey report on recent home laundry conditions. Jpn Soap Detergent Assoc Symp Wash2020;
52: 33–40.
2.
KashiwaIHirabayashiTTsunodaTObaY.Study of detergency. 16 physico-chemical and mechanical actions in washing process. J Oleo Sci1971;
20: 44–49.
3.
NakagawaY.Cleanliness of clothes. J Jpn Res Assoc Text End-Uses1996;
37: 464–471.
4.
KobayashiAMoriKKishimotoYNagaiSAmanoH.Study of detergency I an analysis of the process of removing soil in a pulsator washing machine. Natl Tech Rep1972;
18: 705–713.
5.
HasegawaTTadaCJ.J Oleo Sci1983;
32: 397–402.
6.
HasegawaT.Mechanical force in textile washing. J Oleo Sci2008;
8: 495–501.
7.
Oya-HasegawaMSatoYOyaM.Analysis of interaction between mechanical force and chemical effect in cleaning phenomenon by probability density functional method. J Oleo Sci2022;
25: 351–360.
8.
YamaguchiYSaitoMGotoSNagayamaM.Optimization of detergent dosage under condition of lowering liquor ration in home laundry. J Oleo Sci1997;
46: 991–997.
9.
MatsuiHFukuokaS.Washing of fabrics. Part 5: Experiments and analysis about washing of cotton and polyester fabrics. J Text Mach Soc Jpn1978;
31: 45–54.
10.
NishideSSekiguchiN.Detergency by mechanical actions of washer for kinds of fabric. Ann Rep Facult Educ Bunkyo Univ1984;
18: 67–73.
11.
YamaguchiYKobayashiYNagayamaM.Characteristics of soil deposition and removal and evaluation of detergency for various polyester fabrics. J Home Econ Jpn1997;
48: 329–337.
12.
YamaguchiYKobayashiYNagayamaM.Soil redeposition on polyester fibers with decrease in liquor ration in home laundry. J Oleo Sci1998; 47.
13.
GotohKNakataniHTokuyasuE.High performance cleaning of fibrous assemblies with applying ultrasound. Sen’i Gakkaishi2014;
70: 273–280.
14.
BreenNEDurnamDJObendorfSK.Residual oily soil distribution on polyester/cotton fabric after, laundering with selected detergents at various wash temperatures. Text Res J1984;
54: 198–204.
15.
Kay ObendorfSKWebbJJ.Detergency study: distribution of natural soils on shirt collars. Text Res J1987;
57: 557–563.
16.
GotohK.Investigation of optimum liquid for textile washing using artificially soiled fabrics. Text Res J2010;
80: 548–556.
17.
SasakiSMoritaAKameyaTOyaM.Improving the removability of mud stains by combining a homopolymer and a chelating agent. J Oleo Sci2024;
73: 73–83.
18.
Oya-HasegawaMOyaM.A small-scale washing test that reproduces the mechanical forces occurring inside a commercial washing machine. J Oleo Sci2023;
72: 161–170.
19.
DahlboHAaltoKEskelinenHSalmenperäH.Increasing textile circulation—consequences and requirements. Sustain Prod Consump2017;
9: 44–57.
20.
FukuharaM.History of polyester fiber technologies used for making textiles. Natl Museum Nat Sci Syst Res Rep2007;
7.
21.
KatayamaMFunabashiRFujikawaSOzawaR.A modified MA-test method for evaluating mechanical action in machine washing. J Home Econ Jpn2003;
54: 477–483.
22.
GochoHTsunekawaHUenishiTInagakiS.Influence of surfactant contents on detergency. Proc Jissen Women's Univ Fac Human Life Sci2017;
54: 057–060.
23.
InoueMSuzukiN. Properties of detergency on commercial laundry No.2. In: 54th Annual Congress of The Japan Society of Home Economics, 2003; Vol. 54, 218, Released on J-STAGE 29 July. doi:10.11428/kasei.54.0.218.0
24.
OyaMUshikawaY.Proper procedure for judging superiority of washing power of detergents - analysis of the washing test results of commercial detergents and alkaline agents. J Jpn Res Assoc Text End-Uses2007;
48(9): 613–618.
25.
TujiMSaitoM.Ingredients and detergency of commercial laundry detergents in Japan and United States. J Jpn Oil Chem Soc1997;
46(11): 1383–1413.
26.
MizuhashiHKamijoMYoshidaHKuboM.The effect of mixing ratio against material properties of knitted fabric made by blended yarn with polypropylene and cotton. J Fiber Sci Technol2017;
73: 75–81.
27.
SendaNYamamotoRFujisigeS.Crease recovery of woven fabrics evaluated in wet state. Bull Tokyo Coll Domest Sci2001;
41: 97–101.
28.
YaidaOTaniharaT.Experimental study on the evaluation of various “Shiwa” in Japanese. Annu Rep Human Life Sci Osaka City Univ1986;
34: 43–48.
29.
TuchidaKAdachiAHaradaT.Wear sensations of wet fabrics. J Text Mach Soc Jpn1986;
39: P320–P327.
