Facile thermoplastic polyurethane-based multi-walled carbon nanotube ink for fabrication of screen-printed fabric electrodes of wearable e-textiles with high adhesion and resistance stability under large deformation
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2021
Facile thermoplastic polyurethane-based multi-walled carbon nanotube ink for fabrication of screen-printed fabric electrodes of wearable e-textiles with high adhesion and resistance stability under large deformation
Carbon nanotubes have been widely used to formulate printed conductive ink in recent years due to their excellent conductivity, chemical stability and mechanical properties. However, the common problems of this ink, such as poor adhesion and low resistance stability under large deformation, hinder its application in the fabric electrodes (FEs) of wearable and stretchable e-textiles. Herein, conductive inks with a simple preparation process, high adhesion and conductive stability were formulated by mixing the conductive filler, multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), into a thermoplastic polyurethane matrix with a reversible cross-linked structure. Then it is evaluated whether the MWCNT-based conductive ink is suitable for the screen-printing fabrication of highly durable and washable FEs. The experimental results showed that the screen-printed fabric electrode exhibited remarkable resistance stability under bending and folding deformation. In particular, after 1000 bending cycles and 100 folding–unfolding cycles under additional pressure, the sheet resistance of FEs only increased by 0.8% and 5.0%, respectively. Moreover, the screen-printed conductive pattern has strong adhesion to polyamide fabric substrate by the Scotch tape and washing tests, and there are no significant changes in resistance and surface morphology. High-performance conductive inks with facile and large-scale production potential are developed, and show great prospect in the development of wearable printing e-textiles.
KarimNAfrojSTanSR, et al.
Scalable production of graphene-based wearable e-textiles. ACS Nano2017;
11: 12266–12275.
2.
ChenSLiuSQWangPP, et al.
Highly stretchable fiber-shaped e-textiles for strain/pressure sensing, full-range human motions detection, health monitoring, and 2D force mapping. J Mater Sci2018;
53: 2995–3005.
3.
HeoEChoiKYKimJ, et al.
A wearable textile antenna for wireless power transfer by magnetic resonance. Text Res J2018;
88: 913–921.
4.
LeeHLeeJIParkHJ, et al.
Communication-screen-printed silver electrodes for enhanced performance in light-emitting devices based on electrochemiluminescence. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol2019;
8: R146–R148.
5.
XuDShenHJXieJJ, et al. Screen printing, modification via post-treatment and application in dye-sensitized solar cells of PEDOT:PSS films. Acta Polym Sin2019;
50: 36–43.
6.
AfrojSTanSRAbdelkaderAM,et al.
Highly conductive, scalable, and machine washable graphene-based e-textiles for multifunctional wearable electronic applications. Adv Funct Mater 2020; 30: 10.
7.
YangHYaoXFZhengZ, et al.
Highly sensitive and stretchable graphene-silicone rubber composites for strain sensing. Compos Sci Technol2018;
167: 371–378.
8.
HyunWJSecorEBHersamMC, et al.
High-resolution patterning of graphene by screen printing with a silicon stencil for highly flexible printed electronics. Adv Mater2015;
27: 109–115.
9.
TehraniFBeltran-GastelumMShethK, et al.
Laser-induced graphene composites for printed, stretchable, and wearable electronics. Adv Mater Technol2019;
4: 11.
10.
RenJSWangCXZhangX, et al.
Environmentally-friendly conductive cotton fabric as flexible strain sensor based on hot press reduced graphene oxide. Carbon2017;
111: 622–630.
11.
CuiJSZhouSX.Highly conductive and ultra-durable electronic textiles via covalent immobilization of carbon nanomaterials on cotton fabric. J Mater Chem C2018;
6: 12273–12282.
12.
WangDLiDWZhaoM, et al.
Multifunctional wearable smart device based on conductive reduced graphene oxide/polyester fabric. Appl Surf Sci2018;
454: 218–226.
13.
LiuZXLiHFZhuMS, et al.
Towards wearable electronic devices: a quasi-solid-state aqueous lithium-ion battery with outstanding stability, flexibility, safety and breathability. Nano Energy2018;
44: 164–173.
14.
SouriHBhattacharyyaD.Highly sensitive, stretchable and wearable strain sensors using fragmented conductive cotton fabric. J Mater Chem C2018;
6: 10524–10531.
15.
CaoRPuXJDuXY, et al.
Screen-printed washable electronic textiles as self-powered touch/gesture tribo-sensors for intelligent human-machine interaction. ACS Nano2018;
12: 5190–5196.
16.
SadiMSYangMYLuoL, et al.
Direct screen printing of single-faced conductive cotton fabrics for strain sensing, electrical heating and color changing. Cellulose2019;
26: 6179–6188.
17.
SecorEBGaoTZDos SantosMH, et al.
Combustion-assisted photonic annealing of printable graphene inks via exothermic binders. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2017;
9: 29418–2-9423.
18.
SouriHBhattacharyyaD.Electrical conductivity of the graphene nanoplatelets coated natural and synthetic fibres using electrophoretic deposition technique. Int J Smart Nano Mater2018;
9: 167–183.
19.
PurohitRPurohitKRanaS, et al.
Carbon nanotubes and their growth methods.Procedia Mater Sci2014;
6: 716–728.
20.
KoJJeeSLeeJH, et al.
High durability conductive textile using MWCNT for motion sensing. Sens Actuator A Phys2018;
274: 50–56.
21.
ArbabAAMemonAASunKC, et al.
Fabrication of conductive and printable nano carbon ink for wearable electronic and heating fabrics. J Colloid Interface Sci2019;
539: 95–106.
22.
WangYWangWQiQB, et al.
Layer-by-layer assembly of PDMS-coated nickel ferrite/multiwalled carbon nanotubes/cotton fabrics for robust and durable electromagnetic interference shielding. Cellulose2020;
27: 2829–2845.
23.
SeoaneFSoroudiALuK, et al.
Textile-friendly interconnection between wearable measurement instrumentation and sensorized garments-initial performance evaluation for electrocardiogram recordings. Sensors2019;
19: 15.
24.
ThessALeeRNikolaevP, et al.
Crystalline ropes of metallic carbon nanotubes. Science1996;
273: 483–487.
25.
LiuBLiuYFChiWD,et al.
Effects of alkali and acid treatment on structures and morphologies of carbon nanotubes. Carbon Techniq2008;
27: 1–6.
26.
dos SantosAMMerliniCRamoaS, et al.
Comparative study of electrically conductive polymer composites of polyester-based thermoplastic polyurethane matrix with polypyrrole and montmorillonite/polypyrrole additive. Polym Compos2020;
41: 2003–2012.
27.
WuLHQianJPengJH, et al.
Screen-printed flexible temperature sensor based on FG/CNT/PDMS composite with constant TCR. J Mater Sci-Mater Electron2019;
30: 9593–9601.
28.
WooSJKongJHKimDG, et al.
A thin all-elastomeric capacitive pressure sensor array based on micro-contact printed elastic conductors. J Mater Chem C2014;
2: 4415–4422.
29.
WangYChenCXieH, et al.
3D-printed all-fiber li-ion battery toward wearable energy storage. Adv Funct Mater2017;
27: 1703140.
30.
TangZJiaSZhouC, et al.
3D printing of highly sensitive and large-measurement-range flexible pressure sensors with a positive piezoresistive effect. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2020;
12: 28669–28680.
31.
LuoBWeiYChenHL, et al.
Printing carbon nanotube-embedded silicone elastomers via direct writing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2018;
10: 44796–44802.
32.
HongHHuJYanX.UV Curable conductive ink for the fabrication of textile-based conductive circuits and wearable UHF RFID tags. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2019;
11: 27318–27326.
33.
LinMYGaiYZXiaoD, et al.
Preparation of pristine graphene paste for screen printing patterns with high conductivity. Chem Phys Lett2018;
713: 98–104.
34.
SadiMSPanJJXuAC, et al.
Direct dip-coating of carbon nanotubes onto polydopamine-templated cotton fabrics for wearable applications. Cellulose2019;
26: 7569–7579.
35.
CataldiPBayerISBonaccorsoF, et al.
Foldable conductive cellulose fiber networks modified by graphene nanoplatelet-bio-based composites. Adv Electron Mater2015;
1: 8.
36.
KhairNIslamRShahariarH.Carbon-based electronic textiles: materials, fabrication processes and applications. J Mater Sci2019;
54: 10079–10101.
37.
AltayBNJourdanJTurkaniVS, et al.
Impact of substrate and process on the electrical performance of screen-printed nickel electrodes: fundamental mechanism of ink film roughness. ACS Appl Energ Mater2018;
1: 7164–7173.
38.
Martin-GallegoMBernalMMHernandezM, et al.
Comparison of filler percolation and mechanical properties in graphene and carbon nanotubes filled epoxy nanocomposites. Eur Polym J2013;
49: 1347–1353.
39.
HanJHZhangHChenMJ, et al.
CNT buckypaper/thermoplastic polyurethane composites with enhanced stiffness, strength and toughness. Compos Sci Technol2014;
103: 63–71.
40.
TadesseMGMengistieDAChenY, et al.
Electrically conductive highly elastic polyamide/lycra fabric treated with PEDOT:PSS and polyurethane. J Mater Sci2019;
54: 9591–9602.
41.
CataldiPCeseracciuLAthanassiouA, et al.
Healable cotton-graphene nanocomposite conductor for wearable electronics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2017;
9: 13825–13830.
42.
ZahidMPapadopoulouELAthanassiouA, et al.
Strain-responsive mercerized conductive cotton fabrics based on PEDOT:PSS/graphene. Mater Des2017;
135: 213–222.
43.
CataldiPBonaccorsoFCastilloAED, et al.
Cellulosic graphene biocomposites for versatile high-performance flexible electronic applications. Adv Electron Mater2016;
2: 8.
44.
KarimNAfrojSTanSR, et al.
All inkjet-printed graphene-silver composite ink on textiles for highly conductive wearable electronics applications. Sci Rep2019;
9: 10.
45.
CaiGMXuZLYangMY, et al.
Functionalization of cotton fabrics through thermal reduction of graphene oxide. Appl Surf Sci2017;
393: 441–448.
