Loop length is one of the most relevant variables to control while producing knitted fabrics because the final characteristics of the finished fabric depend on it to a great extent. The procedure followed to calculate it is based on standard UNE-EN 14970, and it is cumbersome, time-consuming and requires yarn-measuring equipment. This study investigated several single jersey and 1 × 1 rib structures produced with different yarn counts and 100% cotton yarns, and a 1 × 1 rib structure that was half-plated in alternating courses by defining four relaxation states of the different fabrics: two knits (knitting and dry relaxation and knitting and wet relaxation) and two dyed (dyed and dry relaxation and dyed and wet relaxation). The most significant dimensional variables were characterized in all the relaxation states and models were presented that explain the variability of the yarn length absorbed by the loop using other variables that are much simpler to analyze.
Chamberlain J. Hosiery yarns and fabrics. Leicester: Leicester College of Technology and Commerce, 1926, p.107.
2.
Allan HS, Greenwood PF, Leah RD, et al. Prediction of Finished Weight and Shrinkage of Cotton Knits–The Starfish Project. Part I: Introduction and General Overview. Text Res J 1983; 53: 109–119.
3.
Singh G, Roy K, Varshney, R, et al. Dimensional parameters of single jersey cotton knitted fabrics. Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research (IJFTR) 2011; 36
4.
AmreevaGKurbakA. Experimental studies on the dimensional properties of half milano and milano rib fabrics. Text Res2007; 77: 151–160. .
5.
BlackDH. Shrinkage control for cotton and cotton blend knitted fabrics. Text Res J1974; 44: 606–611. .
6.
Demiroz A. A study of graphical representation of knitted structures. PhD Thesis, UMIST, Manchester, UK, 1998.
7.
GravasEKiekensPLangenhoveL. An approach to the ‘Proknit’ system and its value in the production of weft-knitted fabrics. AUTEX Res J2005; 5: 220–227. .
8.
GrowersCHunterFN. The wet relaxed dimensions of plain knitted fabrics. J Text Inst1978; 69: 108–115. .
9.
HeapSAGreenwoodPFLeahRD, et al.Prediction of finished weight and shrinkage of cotton knits—the Starfish Project: part I: introduction and general overview. Text Res J1983; 53: 109–119. .
10.
Heap SA. Low shrink cotton knits textiles fashioning the future. In: textile institute annual world conference proceedings, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 1989.
11.
HeapSAStevensJC. Shrinkage, if you can predict it you can control it. Cotton Technol Int1993, pp. 13: 32–32.
12.
Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer, 2016..
13.
KurbakAAmreevaG. Creation of a geometrical model for milano rib fabric. Text Res J2006; 76: 847–852. .
14.
LeafGAVGlaskinA. Geometry of plain knitted loop. J Text Inst1955; 46: T587 .
15.
LeongKHFalzonPJBannisterMK, et al.An investigation of the mechanical performance of weft knitted milano rib glass/epoxy composites. Comp Sci Technol1988; 52: 239–251. .
16.
MündenDL. The geometry and dimensional properties of plain knit fabrics. J Text Inst1959; 50: T448–T471. .
17.
PeirceFT. Geometrical principles applicable to the design of functional fabrics. Text Res J1947; 17: 123–147. .
18.
PoinclouxSAdda-BediaMLechenaultF. Geometry and elasticity of a knitted fabric. Phys Rev X2018, pp. 8: 1–14.
19.
MündenDL. The dimensional behaviour of knitted fabrics. J Text Inst1960; 51: 200–209.
20.
MundenDL. Knitting versus weaving. Text Merc Int1963; 12: 10–13.
21.
NayakRKanesalingamSHoushyarS, et al.Effect of repeated laundering and dry-cleaning on the thermo-physiological comfort properties of aramid fabrics. Fiber Polym2016; 17: 954–962.
22.
DoyleDJ. Fundamental aspects of the design of knitted fabrics. J Text Inst1953; 44: 561–578.
23.
NuttingTSLeafGAV. A generalised geometry of weft knitted fabrics. J Text Inst1968; 55: T45–53.
24.
KnaptonJJFAhrensFIIngenthronWW, et al.The dimensional properties of knitted wool fabrics, part I: the plain knitted structure. J Text Inst1968; 38: 999–1012.
25.
KnaptonJJFTruterEVAzizAKMA. Geometry, dimensional properties and stabilization of the cotton plain jersey structure. J Text Inst1975; 66: 413–419.
26.
FletcherHMRobertsSH. The geometry of plain and rib knit fabrics and its relation to shrinkage in laundering. Text Res J1952; 22: 84–88.
27.
FletcherHMRobertsSH. The geometry of knit fabrics made of stape rayon and nylon and its relationship to shrinkage in laundering. Text Res J1952; 23: 37–42.
28.
FletcherHMRobertsSH. Distortion in knit fabrics and its relation to shrinkage in laundering. Text Res J1953; 23: 37–42.
29.
FletcherHMRobertsSH. Relationship of the geometry of plain knit cotton fabric to its dimensional change and elastic properties. Text Res J1954; 24: 729–737.
30.
FletcherHMRobertsSH. Elastic properties of plain and double knit cotton fabrics. Text Res J1965; 35: 497–503.
31.
FletcherHMRobertsSH. Dimensional stability and elasticity properties of plain knit wool fabrics with and without Wurlan finish. Text Res J1965; 35: 993–999.
32.
AtonJT. The Starfish Project: an integrated approach to shrinkage control in cotton knits. Part 4, The Starfish predictive modelo as a design toll. Knit Int1986; 93: 37–40.
33.
GreenwoodPF. The Starfish project: an integrated approach to shrinkage control in cotton knits. Part 6, the influence of the laundering treatment. Knit Int1986; 93: 58–60.
34.
HeapSAGreenwoodPFLeahRD, et al.Prediction of finished relaxed dimensions of cotton knits- the Starfish Project: part II: shrinkage and reference state. Text Res J1985; 55: 211–222.
35.
LeahRD. The Starfish Project: an integrated approach to shrinkage control in cotton knits. Part 5, finishing to achieve specification. Knit Int1986; 93: 96–99.
36.
StevensJC. The Starfish project: an integrated approach to shrinkage control in cotton knits. Part 2, the influence of knitting and finishing variables on the relaxed (reference state) dimensions. Knit Int1986; 93: 80–83.
37.
UrkittFH. The Starfish project: an integrated approach to shrinkage control in cotton knits. Part 1, introduction and definition of the reference state. Knit Int1986; 93: 40–42.
38.
UlsonAACabralLFSouzaMAG. Prediction of dimensional changes in circular knitted cotton fabrics. Text Res J2010; 80: 236–252.
39.
SaravanaKTSampathVR. Prediction of dimensional properties of weft knitted cardigan fabric by artificial neural network system. J Ind Text2012; 42: 446–458.
40.
MobarokAKM. Prediction of dimension and performance of finished cotton knitted fabric from knitting variables. Ann Univ Oradea Fascicle Text2012; 2: 99–103. .
41.
EltahanEAeSultanMMitoA-B. Determination of loop length, tightness factor and porosity of single jersey knitted fabric. Alexandra Eng J2016; 55: 851–856. .
42.
EltahanE. Effect of lycra percentages and loop length on the physical and mechanical properties of single jersey knitted fabrics. J Compos2016, pp. 7: 1–7 .
43.
SitotawD. Dimensional characteristics of knitted fabrics made from 100% cotton and cotton/elastane yarns. J Eng2018. Epub Ahead of print 2018. DOI:10.1155/2018/8784692.
44.
SitotawDAdamuB. Tensile properties of single jersey and 1x1 rib knitted fabrics made from 100% cotton and cotton/lycra yarns. J Eng Epub Ahead of print 2017, pp. DOI:10.1155/2017/4310782 .
45.
LlinaresJMiróPDíazP. Modelling loop length in weft-knitted fabrics with an interlock structure after the dyeing process with a stich density, wales and courses per centimeter analysis. J Text Inst2020; 111(7): 934–940.
46.
UNE-EN ISO 6330: 2012. Procedimiento de lavado y secado domésticos para los ensayos textiles.
47.
UNE-EN 14971: 2006. Determinación del número de puntadas por unidad de longitud y unidad de área.
48.
UNE-EN 14970: 2007. Determinación de la longitud de hilo absorbido o consumido y de la masa lineal o título del hilo en los tejidos de punto por recogida.
