Algorithm for measuring fiber length distributions of raw cotton and combed wool using dual-beard image method

Abstract

The dual-beard image method, which has been developed in recent years as a fast and economical method for fiber length measurement, consists of dual-beard specimen preparation, image processing, fibrogram extraction, and length parameter calculations. However, one of the shortcomings of this method is that it can only produce extremely limited length parameters such as mean length, coefficient of variation, modal length, and quality length (UHML, upper half mean length). This study introduces a new algorithm for converting the dual-beard fibrogram into a length distribution histogram which can be used to calculate most of the current length parameters. The algorithm is based on the short fiber content formulae but modified by theoretical analysis and experimental comparison. The length distributions of 24 cotton samples and 12 wool samples are measured by dual-beard image method with the new algorithm, and Advanced Fiber Information System (AFIS) and Almeter are employed for comparison. Comparative analysis shows that the peaks and ranges of the distribution histograms using the dual-beard method are similar to those from the reference methods, and the shapes of histograms from difference methods match well with one another. In addition, five length parameters calculated from the dual-beard distributions are verified to be consistent with those measured by AFIS and Almeter. The new algorithm employed in the dual-beard image method avoids the differential operation which amplifies the curve error, giving the dual-beard image method the ability to output more comprehensive length information.

Keywords

dual-beard image method length distribution fiber measurement cotton wool

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wanjura

Armijo

Delhom

, et al. Effects of harvesting and ginning practices on Southern High Plains cotton: fiber quality. Text Res J 2019; 89: 4938–4958.

Kelly

Hequet

. Variation in the advanced fiber information system cotton fiber length-by-number distribution captured by high volume instrument fiber length parameters. Text Res J 2018; 88: 754–765.

Krifa

. Cotton fiber length distribution modality alteration in ginning and mill processing. J Text Inst 2013; 104: 731–744.

Kuang

Guan

Rodgers

, et al. Study on length distribution of ramie fibers. J Text Inst 2017; 108: 1853–1862.

Kelly

Hequet

Dever

. Breeding for improved yarn quality: Modifying fiber length distribution. Ind Crop Prod 2013; 42: 386–396.

Jia

Ren

Feng

. Simulation on combing processing and prediction of combing web quality based on fiber length distribution by number. J Text Res 2017; 38: 23–27.

Wang

. Features and influencing factors of kapok fiber length distribution. Ind Textila 2013; 64: 179–183.

Lee

Chowdhary

Seo

, et al. Effect of the stretch breaking process on fiber length distribution. Text Res J 2009; 79: 626–631.

Khanlou

Woodfield

Summerscales

, et al. Consolidation process boundaries of the degradation of mechanical properties in compression moulding of natural-fibre bio-polymer composites. Polym Degrad Stab 2017; 138: 115–125.

10.

Khanlou

Hall

Woodfield

, et al. The mechanical properties of flax fibre reinforced poly(lactic acid) bio-composites exposed to wet, freezing and humid environments. J Compos Mater 2018; 52: 835–850.

11.

Khanlou

Hall

Michael

, et al. Technical note: on modelling thermo-chemical degradation of poly(lactic acid). Polym Degrad Stab 2016; 134: 19–21.

12.

Khanlou

Woodfield

Summerscales

, et al. Estimation of mechanical property degradation of poly(lactic acid) and flax fibre reinforced poly(lactic acid) bio-composites during thermal processing. Measurement 2018; 116: 367–372.

13.

Cui

Rodgers

Cai

, et al. Obtaining cotton fiber length distributions from the beard test method. Part 1. Theoretical distributions related to the beard method. J Cotton Sci 2009; 13: 265–273.

14.

Wang

. Image measuring method for fiber length measurements. Ind Textila 2013; 64: 321–326.

15.

Wang

. Dual-beard sampling method for fibre length measurements. Indian J Fibre Text 2014; 39: 72–78.

16.

ASTM D1440-07:2012. Standard test method for length and length distribution of cotton fibers (array method).

17.

GB/T 6098:2018. Test method for length of cotton fibres (roller analyser).

18.

Bragg

Shofner

. A rapid, direct measurement of short fiber content. Text Res J 1993; 63: 171–176.

19.

Zhang YP, Shofner K and Shofner M. True short fiber content: complete fiber length distribution from tapered beards. In: Proceedings of the Betwide cotton conference, Nashville, TN, 7–9 January 2003, pp.1877-1885.

20.

IWTO-17-2017. Determination of fiber length and distribution (Almeter method).

21.

IWTO-62:2010. Determination of fibre length, length distribution, mean fibre diameter and fibre diameter distribution of wool top & slivers by the OFDA 4000.

22.

Bernardin

Grignet

. Measurement of fiber length distribution in raw wool and fine woolen slubbings. Wool Technol Sheep Breed 1994; 42: 51–57.

23.

Brims M and Baxter P, editors. Improving agreement on hauteur measurement between OFDA 4000 and Almeter. IWTO Technology & Standards Committee: Sliver Group, Shanghai, China, November 2004.

24.

Cai

Cui

Rodgers

, et al. An investigation of the sampling bias of the beard method as used in HVI™. J Text Inst 2010; 101: 958–966.

25.

Gibson L. HVI short fiber content measurement. In: Proceedings of the Beltwide cotton conference, Orlando, FL, 3–7 January 1999, pp.1406–1407.

26.

Knowlton L. HVI short fiber measurements. In: Proceedings of the Beltwide cotton conference, Anaheim, CA, 9–13 January 2001, pp.1372–1374.

27.

Krowicki

Thibodeaux

Duckett

. Generating fiber length distribution from the fibrogram. Text Res J 1996; 66: 306–310.

28.

Pabich A, Frydrych I, Raczynska M, et al. The length control: a comparative analysis of cotton length parameters. In: Proceedings of the 7th TEXSCI international conference, Liberec, Czech Republic, 6–8 September 2010, pp.579–585.

29.

Frydrych I, Pabich A, Andrysiak J, et al. The cotton length analysis using the length control. In: Proceedings of the world cotton research conference-5, Mumbai, India, 7–11 November 2011, pp.487–492.

30.

Huang

. Image analysis for cotton fibers. Part II. Cross-sectional measurements. Text Res J 2004; 74: 409–416.

31.

, et al. Snippet counting for cotton length distribution measurement using image analysis. Text Res J 2008; 78: 336–341.

32.

Jin

Wang

. Measurement of short fiber contents in raw cotton using dual-beard images. Text Res J 2018; 88: 14–26.

33.

Wang

. Optical algorithm for calculating the quantity distribution of fiber assembly. Appl Opt 2016; 55: 7157–7162.

34.

Wang

. The random-beard image method system for scoured combed wool fiber length measurement. Text Res J 2019; 89: 4746–4755.

35.

Zhou

Wang

Wei

, et al. Extracting fiber length distributions from dual-beard fibrographs with the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. Text Res J 2020; 90: 37–48.

36.

Chen XF. Study on standard sampling and accuracy of random-tuft image method for measuring wool length. Master's Thesis, Donghua University, China, 2017.

37.

Chen

Jin

Wang

. The error checked in AFIS system test. China Fiber Inspection 2013; 10: 67–69.