This paper reviews the topic of yarn pull-out on a plain woven fabric. It deals with previous works on experimental testing and theory exploration regarding this process, also including the prominent stick-slip behavior and the associated modeling techniques. Finally, it discusses the advances in chemical treatment and construction modification for the increase in yarn gripping force. The current paper serves as a source of literature for those willing to undertake additional research in this area and for those interested in developing flexible body armor with improved ballistic protection.
CheesemanBABogettiTA. Ballistic impact into fabric and compliant composite laminates. Compos Struct2003; 61: 161–173.
2.
TabieiANilakantanG. Ballistic impact of dry woven fabric composites: a review. Appl Mech Rev2008; 61: 129–137.
3.
ShahkaramiACepusEVaziriRet al.Material responses to ballistic impact. In: BhatnagarA (ed). Lightweight ballistic composite, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing/Elsevier, 2006, pp. 82–95.
4.
BazhenovS. Dissipation of energy by bulletproof aramid fabric. J Mater Sci1997; 32: 4167–4173.
5.
KirkwoodJEKirkwoodKMLeeYSet al.Yarn pull–out as a mechanism for dissipating ballistic impact energy in Kevlar® KM–2 fabric, part II: prediction of ballistic performance. Text Res J2004; 74: 939–948.
6.
KirkwoodKMKirkwoodJELeeYSet al.Yarn pull–out as a mechanism for dissipating ballistic impact energy in Kevlar® KM–2 Fabric, part I: quasi–static characterization of yarn pull–out. Text Res J2004; 74: 920–928.
ZhouYChenX. Numerical investigations into the response of fabrics subjected to ballistic impact. J Ind Tex2016; 45: 1530–1547.
9.
WangYChenXYoungRet al.Finite element analysis of effect of inter-yarn friction on ballistic impact response of woven fabrics. Compos Struct2016; 135: 8–16.
10.
NilakantanGMerrillRLKeefeMet al.Experimental investigation of the role of frictional yarn pull–out and windowing on the probabilistic impact response of Kevlar fabrics. Composites Part B2015; 68: 215–229.
11.
BilisikK. In–plane shear properties of para–aramid (Kevlar®) fabric by yarn pull–out method. J Ind Text2012; 42: 76–96.
12.
HwangHSMalakootiMHPattersonBAet al.Increased interyarn friction through zno nanowire arrays grown on aramid fabric. Compos Sci Technol2015; 107: 75–81.
13.
ZhuDSoranakomCMobasherBet al.Experimental study and modelling of single yarn pull–out behavior of kevlar®49 fabric. Composites Part A2011; 42: 868–879.
14.
RavandiSAHToriumiK. Spectral analysis of the yarn–pullout force from plain–weave fabric. J Text Inst1996; 87: 522–531.
15.
BilisikK. Properties of yarn pull–out in para–aramid fabric structure and analysis by statistical model. Composites Part A2011; 42: 1930–1942.
16.
MajumdarALahaA. Effect of fabric construction and shear thickening fluid on yarn pull–out from high–performance fabrics. Text Res J2015; 86: 2056–2066.
17.
GawandiAThostensonETGilllespieJW. Tow pull out behaviour of polymer–coated Kevlar® fabric. J Mater Sci2011; 46: 77–89.
18.
BilisikK. In–plane shear properties of polyester satin fabric by yarn pull–out method. Text Res J2012; 82: 1263–1281.
19.
DongZSunCT. Testing and modelling of yarn pull–out in plain woven Kevlar® fabrics. Composites Part A2009; 40: 1863–1869.
20.
TanVBCTayTETeoWK. Strengthening fabric armour with silica colloidal suspensions. Int J Solid Struct2005; 42: 1561–1576.
21.
SunDChenXWellsG. Engineering and analysis of gripping fabrics for improved ballistic performance. J Compos Mater2014; 48: 1355–1364.
22.
SunDMrangoMChenX. Investigating ballistic impact on fabric targets with gripping yarns. Fibre Polym2013; 14: 1184–1189.
23.
SunDChenX. Plasma modification of Kevlar fabrics for ballistic applications. Text Res J2012; 82: 1928–1934.
24.
LeeBWKimIJKimCG. The influence of the particle size of silica on the ballistic performance of fabrics impregnated with silica colloidal suspension. J Compos Mater2009; 43: 2679–2698.
25.
GuoZHongJZhengJChenW. Out–of–plane effects on dynamic pull–out of p–phenyleneterephthalamide yarns. Text Res J2014; 85: 140–149.
26.
GuoZHongJZhengJet al.Loading rate effects on dynamic out–of plane yarn pull–out. Text Res J2014; 84: 1708–1719.
27.
SebastianSARDBaileyAIBriscoeBJet al.Extensions, displacements and forces associated with pulling a single yarn from a fabric. J Phys D Appl Phys1987; 20: 130–139.
28.
SebastianSARDBaileyAIBriscoeBJet al.Effect of a softening agent on yarn pull–out force of a plain weave fabric. Text Res Inst1986; 56: 604–611.
29.
ZhuDSoranakomCMobasherBet al.Experimental study and modelling of single yarn pull-out behaviour of Kevlar 49® fabric. Composites Part A2011; 42: 868–879.
30.
MotamediFBaileyAIBriscoeBJet al.Theory and practice of localized fabric deformations. Text Res J1989; 59: 160–172.
31.
Shockey DA, Erlich DC and Simons J. Improved barriers to turbine engine fragments: interim report. Report DOT/FAA/AR-99/8. Office of Aviation Research, Washington, D.C., 2001.
32.
ZhouYChenXWellsG. Influence of yarn gripping on the ballistic performance of woven fabrics from ultra–high molecular weight polyethylene fibre. Composites Part B2014; 62: 198–204.
33.
SunFDuZYuWet al.Effect of bending rigidity, Poisson’s ratio and surface friction of fabrics on the stretching step of the comprehensive handle evaluation system for fabrics and yarns. Text Res J1947; 86: 1–15.
34.
Sun F, Gao R, Hu X, et al. Experimental study on an effective method for the friction property of fabrics by the comprehensive handle evaluation system for fabrics and yarns system. Text Res J. 2018; 88(8): 882–891.
35.
BilisikKYildirimB. Weft directional stick–slip force of yarn pull-out in para–aramid fabric for ballistics. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2014; 27: 1167–1191.
36.
CunniffPM. An analysis of the system effects of woven fabrics under ballistic impact. Text Res J1992; 62: 15–15.
37.
SongWJFabrics and composites for the ballistic protection of personnel. In: BhatnagarA (ed). Lightweight ballistic composite, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing/Elsevier, 2006, pp. 210–240.
38.
NilakantanGGillespieJWGJr. Yarn pull–out behavior of plain woven Kevlar fabrics: effect of yarn sizing, pullout rate, and fabric pre–tension. Compos Struct2013; 101: 215–224.
39.
BilisikK. Experimental determination of yarn pull-out properties of para-aramid (Kevlar®) woven fabric. J Ind Text2012; 43: 201–221.
40.
BilisikKKorkmazM. Single and multiple yarn pull-outs on aramid woven fabric structures. Text Res J2001; 81: 867–864.
41.
DongZSunCT. Testing and modeling of yarn pull-out in plain woven Kevlar® fabrics. Composites Part A2009; 40: 1863–1869.
42.
BilisikKYolacanG. Single and multiple yarn pull-out on E-glass woven fabric structures. Text Res J2011; 81: 2043–2055.
43.
BilisikK. Effect of interlacement frequency on the single and multiple yarn end pull–out properties of woven fabrics. Text Res J2011; 81: 585–597.
44.
BilisikK. Determination of stick–slip stage of single and multiple yarn ends pull–out in para–aramid (Kevlar®) woven fabric. J Ind Text2012; 43: 90115–90115.
45.
BilisikKKorkmazM. Multilayered and multidirectionally–stitched aramid woven fabric structures: experimental characterization of ballistic performance by considering the yarn pull–out test. Text Res J2010; 80: 1697–1720.
46.
PanNYoonMY. Behaviour of yarn pullout from woven fabrics: theoretical and experimental. Text Res J1993; 63: 629–637.
47.
CoxHL. The elasticity and strength of paper and other fibrous materials. J Appl Phys1952; 3: 72–72.
48.
ValizadehMRavandiSAHSheikhzadehMSM. Determination of internal mechanical characteristics of woven fabrics using the force–balance analysis of yarn pullout test. J Text Inst2008; 99: 47–55.
49.
BadrossamayMRHosseiniRSAMorshedM. Fundamental parameters affecting yarn–pull out behavior. J Text Inst2001; 92: 280–287.
50.
NaamanAENamurGGAlwanJMet al.Fiber pullout and bond slip. I: analytical study. J Struct Eng1991; 117: 2769–2790.
51.
NaamanAENamurGGAlwanJMet al.Fiber pull out and bond slip. II: experimental validation. J Struct Eng1991; 117: 2791–2800.
52.
SuekiSMobasherBSoranakomC. Pullout–slip response of fabrics embedded in a cement paste matrix. J Mater Civil Eng2007; 19: 718–727.
53.
TaylorHM. Tensile and tearing strength of cotton cloths. J Text Inst1959; 50: 161–188.
54.
BilisikKDemiryurekOYolacanG. Analyses and statistical modeling of crimp extension stage of single and multiple yarn ends pull–out in textured polyester woven fabric. J Text Inst2013; 42: 319–339.
55.
RoylanceDWangSS. Penetration mechanism of textile structure. Meth Phenomena1980; 5: 273–292.
56.
ShimVPWTanVBCTayTE. Modelling deformation and damage characteristics of woven fabric under small projectile impact. Int J Impact Eng1995; 16: 585–605.
57.
ShimVPWLimCTFooKJ. Dynamic mechanical properties of fabric armour. Int J Impact Eng2001; 25: 1–15.
58.
TanVBCShimVPWZengX. Modelling crimp in woven fabrics subjected to ballistic impact. Int J Impact Eng2005; 32: 561–574.
59.
GuB. Ballistic penetration of conically cylindrical steel projectile into plain–woven fabric target – a finite element simulation. Int J Compos Mater2004; 38: 2049–2074.
60.
DuanYKeefeMBogettiTAet al.Modelling friction effects on the ballistic impact behaviour of a single–ply high–strength fabric. Int J Compos Mater2005; 31: 996–1012.
61.
DuanYKeefeMBogettiTAet al.Finite element modeling of transverse impact on a ballistic fabric. Int J Mech Sci2006; 48: 33–43.
62.
ValizadehMLomovSRavandiSAHet al.Finite element simulation of a yarn pullout test for plain woven fabrics. Text Res J2010; 80: 892–903.
63.
HoffmanRL. Explanations for the cause of shear thickening in concentrated colloidal dispersions. J Rheol1998; 42: 111–111.
64.
BarnesHA. Shear–thickening (“Dilatancy”) in suspensions of nonaggregating solid particles dispersed in Newtonian liquids. J Rheol1989; 33: 329–366.
65.
BradyJFBossisG. The rheology of concentrated suspensions of spheres in simple shear flow by numerical simulation. J Fluid Mech1985; 155: 105–129.
66.
HasanzadehMMottaghitalabVBabaeiHet al.The influence of carbon nanotubes on quasi–static puncture resistance and yarn pull–out behavior of shear–thickening fluids (STFs) impregnated woven fabrics. Composites Part A2016; 88: 263–271.
67.
LeeYSWetzelEDWagnerNJ. The ballistic impact performance of Kevlar woven fabric impregnated with a colloidal shear thickening fluid. J Mater Sci2003; 38: 2825–2833.
HassanTARangariVKJeelaniS. Synthesis, processing and characterization of shear thickening fluid (STF) impregnated fabric composites. Mater Sci Eng A2010; 527: 2892–2899.
70.
FengXLiSWangYet al.Effects of different silica particles on quasistatic stab resistant properties of fabrics impregnated with shear thickening fluids. Mater Des2014; 64: 456–61.
71.
BaharvandiHRKhaksariPKordaniNet al.Analyzing the quasi–static puncture resistance performance of shear thickening fluid enhanced p–aramid composite. Fiber Polym2014; 15: 2193–2200.
72.
SunLLXiongDSXuCY. Application of shear thickening fluid in ultra high molecular weight polyethylene fabric. J Appl Polym Sci2013; 129: 1922–1928.
73.
BriscoeBJMotamediF. The ballistic impact characters of aramid fabrics: the influence of interface friction. Text Res J1992; 158: 229–247.
74.
SunDStyliosG. Fabric surface properties affected by low temperature plasma treatment. J Mater Process Technol2006; 173: 172–177.
75.
KanCWChanKYuenCWM. Plasma modification of wool: the effect of plasma gas on the properties of the wool fabric. J China Textil Univ1998; 23: 5–10.
76.
ChuYChenXSheelDWet al.Surface modification of aramid fibers by atmospheric pressure plasma–enhanced vapor deposition. Text Res J2014; 84: 1288–1297.
77.
ChuYChenXWangQet al.An investigation on sol–gel treatment to aramid yarn to increase inter–yarn friction. Appl Surf Sci2014; 320: 710–717.
78.
AhmadMRWanYWanAet al.Performance of natural rubber coated fabrics under ballistic impact. Maly Polym J2007; 2: 3951–3951.
79.
GadowRNiessenKV. Lightweight ballistic with additional stab protection made of thermally sprayed ceramic and cermet coatings on aramide fabrics. Int J Appl Ceram Technol2006; 3: 284–292.
80.
Howell HG, Mieszkis KW and Tabor D. Friction in textiles. London: Butterworths Scientific/AGRIS, 1959, p.47.
81.
Abiru S and Lizuka K. Bulletproof fabric and process for its production. Patent 5935881, USA, 1999.
82.
WangYChenXYoungRet al.A numerical and experimental analysis of the influence of crimp on ballistic impact response of woven fabrics. Compos Struct2016; 140: 44–52.
83.
Ahmed AY. Physical properties of leno fabrics. PhD Thesis, Victoria University of Manchester, UK, 2002.
84.
BilisikKKorkmazM. Multilayered and multidirectionally–stitched aramid woven fabric structures: experimental characterization of ballistic performance by considering the yarn pull–out test. Text Res J2010; 80: 1697–1720.
