The heat and water vapor transport in clothing results from fabric properties, air layers enclosed in the garment and environmental conditions. Accumulation of moisture in clothing layers intensifies this transport because of the change in thermal properties of wet fabrics and the size of air gap thickness and the contact area. This paper presents distribution of air gaps and contact areas in relation to various moisture contents in typical undershirts confectioned from fabrics with contrasting affinity to moisture. The effect of the undershirt fit, body region, fabric structure and fiber type is also discussed. The air gap thickness and the contact area were determined using three-dimensional scanning and the post-processing technique.
The results show that the influence of the moisture content on the sought parameters noticeably varied among body regions and was related to the regional fit of the clothing. This variation was larger in cotton than polyester undershirts or those containing spandex, but the direct relevance of the fabric structure was not clear. Although influence of the moisture content was found, the magnitude of the air gap thickness and the contact area resulted mainly from the garment fit.
WisslerEHHavenithG. A simple theoretical model of heat and moisture transport in multi-layer garments in cool ambient air. Eur J Appl Physiol2009; 105: 797–808.
2.
MacRaeBALaingRMWilsonCA. Importance of air spaces when comparing fabric thermal resistance. Text Res J2011; 81: 1963–1965.
3.
HesLde AraujoM. Simulation of the effect of air gaps between the skin and a wet fabric on resulting cooling flow. Text Res J2010; 80: 1488–1497.
4.
OhAG. The measurement of water vapour transfer rate through clothing system with air gap between layers. Heat Mass Transfer2008; 44: 375–379.
5.
Spencer-SmithJ. The physical basis of clothing comfort, Part 2: Heat transfer through dry clothing assemblies. Clothing Res J1977; 5: 3–17.
6.
UmenoTHokoiSTakadaS. Prediction of skin and clothing temperatures under thermal transient considering moisture accumulation in clothing. ASHRAE Trans2001; 107: 71–81. .
7.
WederMRossiRMChaigneauC. Evaporative cooling and heat transfer in functional underwear. Int J Cloth Sci Tech2008; 20: 68–78.
8.
KeiserCBeckerCRossiRM. Moisture transport and absorption in multilayer protective clothing fabrics. Text Res J2008; 78: 604–613.
9.
PlanteAMHolcombeBVStephensLG. Fiber hygroscopicity and perceptions of dampness.1. Subjective trials. Text Res J1995; 65: 293–298.
10.
AckerleyROlaussonHWessbergJ. Wetness perception across body sites. Neurosci Lett2012; 522: 73–77.
11.
HockCWSookneAMHarrisM. Thermal properties of moist fabrics. J Res Nat Bur Stand1944; 32: 229–252.
12.
LiYPlanteAMHolcombeBV. Fiber hygroscopicity and perceptions of dampness. 2. Physical-mechanisms. Text Res J1995; 65: 316–324.
13.
NiedermannRRossiRM. Objective and subjective evaluation of the human thermal sensation of wet fabrics. Text Res J2012; 82: 374–384.
14.
JeonEYooSKimE. Psychophysical determination of moisture perception in high-performance shirt fabrics in relation to sweating level. Ergonomics2011; 54: 576–586.
15.
HesL. Heat, moisture and air transfer properties of selected woven fabrics in wet state. In: textile bioengineering and informatics symposium proceedings2008; 1 and 2: 968–976.
16.
ISO9920:2007. Ergonomics of the thermal environment – estimation of thermal insulation and water vapour resistance of a clothing ensemble.
17.
LiYHolcombeBV. Mathematical simulation of heat and moisture transfer in a human-clothing-environment system. Text Res J1998; 68: 389–397.
18.
FanJTLuoZXLiY. Heat and moisture transfer with sorption and condensation in porous clothing assemblies and numerical simulation. Int J Heat Mass Tran2000; 43: 2989–3000.
19.
BergerXSariH. A new dynamic clothing model. Part 1: Heat and mass transfers. Int J Therm Sci2000; 39: 673–683.
20.
LotensWAHavenithG. Calculation of clothing insulation and vapor resistance. Ergonomics1991; 34: 233–254.
21.
LeeYHongKHongSA. 3D quantification of microclimate volume in layered clothing for the prediction of clothing insulation. Appl Ergon2007; 38: 349–355.
22.
ZhangZHLiJ. The volume of air gaps under clothing and its related thermal effects. Text Bioeng Inform S2011; 4(2): 1078–1082. .
23.
MahTSongGW. Investigation of the contribution of garment design to thermal protection. Part 1: Characterizing air gaps using three-dimensional body scanning for women's protective clothing. Text Res J2010; 80: 1317–1329.
24.
WangZNewtonENgR. Ease distribution in relation to the X-line style jacket. Part 1: Development of a mathematical model. J Text Inst2006; 97: 247–256.
25.
XuJHZhangWB. The vacant distance ease relation between body and garment. In: proceedings of the second international conference on information and computing science2009; 4: 38–41. Icic 2009).
26.
KimIYLeeCLiP. Investigation of air gaps entrapped in protective clothing systems. Fire Mater2002; 26: 121–126.
27.
PsikutaAFrackiewicz-KaczmarekJFrydrychI. Quantitative evaluation of air gap thickness and contact area between body and garment. Text Res J2012; 82: 1405–1413.
28.
SongG. Clothing air gap layers and thermal protective performance in single layer garment. J Ind Text2007; 36: 193–205.
29.
KakitsubaN. Investigation into Clothing area factors for tight and loose fitting clothing in three different body positions. J Hum Environ Syst2004; 7: 75–81.
30.
Bohnet E. Distribution of the air gap thickness and contact area in male and female clothing. Textile Product Engineering-Clothing technology, Albstadt-Sigmaringen University, 2013, p.68.
31.
ChuangchildPIhmPKrartiM. Analysis of heat and moisture transfer beneath freezer foundations - Part I. J Sol Energ-T Asme2004; 126: 716–725.
32.
LaingRMGoreSEWilsonCA. Standard test methods adapted to better simulate fabrics in use. Text Res J2010; 80: 1138–1150.
WehnerJAMillerBRebenfeldL. Moisture induced changes in fabric structure as evidenced by air permeability measurements. Text Res J1987; 57: 247–256.
35.
KnaptonJJFFongW. The dimensional properties of knitted wool fabrics: Part IV: 1 X 1 Rib and half-cardigan structures in machine-washing and tumble-drying. Text Res J1970; 40: 1095–1106.
36.
QuaynorLTakahashiMNakajimaM. Effects of laundering on the surface properties and dimensional stability of plain knitted fabrics. Text Res J2000; 70: 28–35.
37.
HattoriYNiwaMKawabataS. Changes in mechanical properties of fabrics after repeated deformation. J Text Mach Soc Jpn1984; 30: 1–12. .
PsikutaAFrackiewicz-KaczmarekJRossiRUse of 3D body scanning technique for heat and mass transfer modelling in clothing. In: ConsultingH (ed). proceedings of 3rd international conference on 3D body scanning technologies, Lugano, Switzerland: Hometrica Consulting, 2012, pp. 51–55.
40.
BryantGMWalterAT. Stiffness and resiliency of wet and dry fibers as a function of temperature. Text Res J1959; 29: 211–219.
41.
KothariVKTandonSK. Shear behavior of woven fabrics. Text Res J1989; 59: 142–150.
42.
BenltoufaSFayalaFNasrallahSB. Determination of yarn and fiber diameters after swelling using a capillary rise method. J Text Inst2011; 103: 517–522.
43.
MarmaraliAB. Dimensional and physical properties of cotton/spandex single jersey fabrics. Text Res J2003; 73: 11–14.
44.
DerlerSGerhardtLC. Tribology of skin: Review and analysis of experimental results for the friction coefficient of human skin. Tribol Lett2012; 45: 1–27.
45.
WolframLJ. Friction of skin. J Soc Cosmet Chem1983; 34: 465–476.
46.
KeninsP. Influence of fiber-type and moisture on measured fabric-to-skin friction. Text Res J1994; 64: 722–728.
47.
SchneiderAMHoschkeBNGoldsmidHJ. Heat-transfer through moist fabrics. Text Res J1992; 62: 61–66.
48.
HolliesRSBogatyH. Some thermal properties of fabrics. 2. Influence of water content. Text Res J1965; 35: 187–190. .
49.
OuzzahraYHavenithGRedortierB. Regional distribution of thermal sensitivity to cold at rest and during mild exercise in males. J Therm Biol2012; 37: 517–523.
