This study aimed to quantify the skin comfort and handle properties of a range of wool fabrics produced from ultrafine wool (13.7–15.1 µm) and in doing so determine if differences in fiber diameter and staple crimp frequency (5.3–7.1 crimps/cm) were important in these properties. The fabrics were evaluated using a range of subjective and objective measurement techniques, including the Wool ComfortMeter, the Wool HandleMeter and in wearer trials. This work indicated that single jersey fabrics made from ultrafine wool are approaching the limit of objective and subjective evaluation of next-to-skin comfort. The results from the Wool ComfortMeter, Wool HandleMeter and the wearer trial show that there were no significant effects that can be attributed to wool staple crimp (fiber curvature) in these ultrafine wool fabrics. The work also demonstrated a difference in the manufacturing response when knitted fabric made from wools of different fiber diameter (13.7–23.7 µm), and using yarns of the same count, resulted in a progressively higher fabric mass per unit area as mean fiber diameter was progressively reduced.
WatkinsPBuxtonA. Luxury fibres, London: Business International, 1992. The Economist Intelligence Unit Special Report No. 2633.
2.
HunterL. Mohair: A review of its properties, processing and applications, Port Elizabeth: CSIR, 1993.
3.
FranckRR. Silk, mohair, cashmere and other luxury fibres, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd and CRC Press LLC, 2001.
4.
McGregorBA. Is Merino Wool a luxury precious fibre. Int J Sheep Wool Sci2002; 50: 319–326.
5.
McGregor BA. Properties, processing and performance of rare and natural fibres: a review and interpretation of existing research results. RIRDC Research Publication No. 11/150 2012. Barton, Australia: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, https://rirdc.infoservices.com.au/items/11-150.
6.
McGregorBA. Variation in the softness and fibre curvature of cashmere, alpaca, mohair and other rare animal fibres. J Textil Inst. Epub ahead of print 2014. DOI:10.1080/00405000.2013.828448. Published on line 5 September 2013.
7.
McGregorBPostleR. Mechanical properties of cashmere single jersey knitted fabrics blended with high and low crimp superfine merino wool. Textil Res J2008; 78: 399–411.
8.
HillbrickLK. Fibre properties affecting the softness of wool and other keratins, PhD Thesis, Deakin University, Australia, 2012.
9.
TesterDH. Fine structure of cashmere and superfine merino wool fibres. Textil Res J1987; 57: 213–219.
10.
WortmannFJWortmannGArmsW. Analysis of specialty fiber/wool blends by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In: proceedings of the 1st international symposium on specialty animal fibers1988; Vol 103: 163–188. Aachen, Schrift. der Deutsches Wollforschungsinstitutet.
11.
McGregor BA. The quality of cashmere and its influence on textile materials produced from cashmere and blends with superfine wool. PhD Thesis, Department of Textile Technology, Faculty of Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2001.
12.
McGregorBPostleR. Worsted cashmere top and yarns blended with low or high curvature superfine merino wool. Textil Res J2007; 77: 792–803.
13.
RivettDLoganRTuckerD. The lipid composition of animal fibres. In: proceedings of the 1st international symposium on specialty animal fibres. Aachen, Schrift. der Deutsches Wollforschungsinstitutet1988; Vol 103: 128–136. .
14.
TuckerDJHudsonAHFLoganRI. Integral lipids of goat fibres. In: proceeding of the 8th international wool textile research conference1990; Vol 2.Christchurch, pp. 364–373.
15.
TuckerDJHudsonAHFOzolinsGC. Some aspects of the structure and composition of specialty animal fibres. In: proceedings of the 1st international symposium on specialty animal fibres. Aachen. Schrift. der Deutsches Wollforschungsinstitutet1988; Vol 103: 71–103.
16.
McGregorBAPostleR. Wear properties of cashmere single jersey knitted fabrics blended with high and low crimp superfine merino wool. Textil Res J2009; 79: 876–887.
17.
McGregorBANaebeM. Relationship between wearer prickle response with fibre and garment properties and wool comfortmeter assessment. J Textil Inst2013; 104: 618–627.
18.
DollingMMarlandDNaylorGRS. Knitted fabric made from 23.2 um wool can be less prickly than fabric made from finer 21.5 um wool. Wool Tech Sheep Breed1992; 40: 69–71.
19.
NaylorGRSVeitchCJMayfieldRJ. Fabric-evoked prickle. Textil Res J1992; 62: 487–493.
20.
NaebeMLutzVMcGregorBA. Effect of surface treatment and knit structure on comfort properties of wool fabrics. J Textil Inst2013; 104: 600–605.
21.
McGregorBANaebeM. Effect of fibre, yarn and knitted fabric attributes associated with wool comfort properties. J Textil Inst2013; 104: 606–617.
22.
TesterDH. relationship between comfort meter values and the prickle rating of garments in wearer trails. Anim Reprod Sci2010; 50: 1077–1081.
23.
GarnsworthyRKGullyRLKeninsP. Identification of the physical stimulus and the neural basis of fabric-evoked prickle. J Neurophysiol1988; 59: 1083–1097.
24.
NaylorGRSPhillipsDGVeitchCJ. Fabric-evoked prickle in worsted spun single jersey fabrics. Part I. The role of fiber end diameter characteristics. Textil Res J1997; 67: 288–295.
25.
AoL-MTangWYangYH. The analyzing and simulating of the interaction between skin and fabric. In: proceedings of the international conference on machine learning cybernetics2007, pp. 1554–1558.
26.
NaebeMMcGregorBASwanP. Associations between the physiological basis of fabric evoked prickle, fiber and yarn characteristics and the wool comfortmeter value. Textil Res J. Epub ahead of print 2014. DOI:10.1177/0040517514527372. Published 25 March 2014.
27.
StevensDMaharT. The beneficial effects of low fiber crimp in worsted processing and on fabric properties and fabric handle. In: proceedings of the 9th international wool textile research conference1995; Vol 2: 134–142.
28.
NaebeMMcGregorBA. Comfort properties of superfine wool and wool/cashmere blend yarns and fabrics. J Textil Inst2013; 104: 634–640.
29.
MaharTJWangH. Measuring fabric handle to define luxury: an overview of handle specification in next-to-skin knitted fabrics from merino wool. Anim Prod Sci2010; 50: 1082–1088.
30.
IWTO Test Method IWTO-12:2011. Measurement of the mean and distribution of fibre diameter using the Sirolan-Laserscan Fibre Diameter Analyser.
31.
IWTO Test Method IWTO-30:2007. Determination of staple length and staple strength.
32.
AS 3535-1988:1988. Wool - method for the measurement of resistance to compression.
33.
Skin comfort of base layer knitted garments. Part 1: Description and evaluation of wearer test protocol. Textile Res J 2014; 84: 1384–1399.
34.
IWTO DTM-66:2014. Draft test method for the skin comfort of finished wool fabrics and garments.
35.
IWTO DTM-67:2014. Draft test method for objective handle evaluation of fine lightweight knitted fabrics by a wool handlemeter.
36.
BeheryHM. Effects of mechanical and physical properties on fabric hand. Textil Res J1986; 56: 227–240.
37.
GroverGSultanMASpivakSM. A screening technique for fabric handle. J Textil Inst1993; 84: 486–494.
38.
PanNYenKC. Physical explanations of fabric extracting curve for fabric handle evaluation. Textil Res J1992; 62: 279–290.
39.
PanN. Quantification and evaluation of human tactile sense towards fabrics. Int J Des Nature2007; 1: 48–60.
40.
KacvinskySPanN. Some issues in performance evaluation of fibrous sheets. IN: INTC, Houston, TX, 2006.
41.
PayneRW. The Guide to GenStat®, Release 15, Part 2: Statistics, VSN International, 2012.
42.
WangHMaharTJPostleR. Instrumental evaluation of orthogonal tactile sensory dimensions for fine lightweight knitted fabrics. J Textil Inst2013; 104: 590–599.
43.
AS 2001.5.2:1995. Relaxation of samples dried in oven overnight at 50℃ and conditioned at standard conditions.
44.
MartindaleJG. A new method of measuring the irregularity of yarns with some observations on the origin of irregularities in worsted slivers and yarns. J Textil Inst1945; 36: T35–T47.
45.
WangXChangLMcGregorB. The hairiness of worsted wool and cashmere yarns and the impact of fiber curvature on hairiness. Textil Res J2006; 76: 281–287.
46.
McGregorBANaebeMWangH. Relationships between wearer assessment and the instrumental measurement of the handle and prickle of wool knitted fabrics. Textil Res J2014. accepted 17 August 2014.
47.
MundenDL. The geometry and dimensional properties of plain-knit fabrics. J Textil Inst1959; 50: T448–T471. .
