Preliminary examination of the effects of relative humidity on the fracture morphology of cotton flat bundles

Abstract

A preliminary examination of the effects of relative humidity (RH) of three testing conditions on cotton fiber fracture morphology is presented herein. In addition, measurements of fiber moisture content, stelometer cotton flat bundle strength and elongation were collected at the three testing conditions. A general trend is observed for moisture content, strength and elongations measurements; testing in conditions with higher RH generally resulted in a progressive increase in moisture content, strength and elongation values. The morphology of broken fibers was also affected by the testing conditions. Fibers broken at high RH (i.e. 70 ± 2°F and 80 ± 2% RH) showed a more frayed fracture where microfibril separation, a fracture pattern that suggests independent microfibril failure, was evident. In contrast, at standard conditions (i.e. 70 ± 2°F and 65 ± 2%), fiber fractures were more granular (clean fractures), a reflection of a more unilateral breaking action. At low RH (i.e. 70 ± 2°F and 50 ± 2%), fiber fractures exhibited a distorted granular pattern, with extended fracture breaks that did not exhibit microfibril separation. Our preliminary findings are of relevance to post-harvest moisture control efforts currently employed in industry and may contribute to larger efforts to understand the effects of the fracture and damage observed in cotton fiber properties.

Keywords

Cotton tenacity elongation moisture AFIS HVI fiber fracture relative humidity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wakelyn

Bertoniere

French

. Physical properties of cotton. Cotton fiber chemistry and technology, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2007, pp. 107–114.

Backe

. Understanding moisture in cotton. Cotton moisture: harvesting through textile processing, Charlottesville, VA: Institute of Textile Technology, 2002, pp. 3–12.

Byler

. Historical review on the effect of moisture content and the addition of moisture to seed cotton before ginning on fiber length. J Cotton Sci 2006; 10: 300–310.

Morton

Hearle

JWS

. Dielectric properties. Physical properties of textile fibers, 3rd edn. Manchester, UK: The Textile Institute, 1993, pp. 481–501.

Hearle

JWS

Peters

. The structure of fibers. Moisture in textiles, New York: Textile Book Publisher, Inc., 1960, pp. 10–13.

Gordon

Horne

Van der Sluijs

. Moisture in cotton – the fundamentals. Aust Cottongrower 2010; 30: 32–35.

Hughs

Mangialardi

Jackson

. Moisture control. Cotton ginners handbook, Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, 1994, pp. 58–68.

Harzallah

Benzina

Drean

. Physical and mechanical properties of cotton fibers: single-fiber failure. Textile Res 2010; 80: 1093–1102.

Hearle

JWS

Lomas

Cooke

. Atlas of fiber fracture and damage to textiles, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited, 1998.

10.

ASTM D1445-75:1984. Standard test method for breaking strength and elongation of cotton fibers (flat bundle method).

11.

ASTM D2495-07:1994. Standard test method for moisture in cotton by oven-drying.

12.

USDA AMS cotton program brochure, Cotton Classification, April 2005.

13.

Taylor RA, Godbey LC, Howle DS et al. Why we need a standard strength test for cotton variety selection. In: Beltwide cotton conferences. San Antonio, TX, 1995, pp.1175–1178.

14.

Cooper HB and Oakley SR. Fiber strength by different test methods. In: Beltwide cotton conferences. New Orleans, LA, 1988, pp.138–139.

15.

Lawson

. Strength of cotton fibers as measured by the Pressley tester and the stelometer. Textile Res 1964; 34: 725–731.

16.

Thibodeaux DP, Delhom CD, Rousselle M-A et al. HVI measurements at non-standard testing environments. In: Beltwide cotton conferences. San Antonio, TX, 2006, pp.1899–1905.

17.

Knowlton JL. Effect of moisture on cotton fiber strength. In: Beltwide cotton conferences. Memphis, TN, 1996, pp.1300–1306.