The aim of the current study was to investigate if human subjects can distinguish five different drying states of three different fabrics. We defined five time-points (drying states) for each fabric with an in-house developed infrared test, as well as gravimetrically. This test records the surface temperature of wetted fabrics with an infrared camera during the drying process. In addition, the weight course during drying was recorded. The subjects evaluated fabrics with different wetting and wicking behaviours in a perception questionnaire. They answered questions about thermal sensation, thermal comfort, pain sensation and wetness perception. In conclusion, the human subjects could not differentiate the drying states of the fabrics as long as they contained water. Only the last drying state (100% dry, as measured with the infrared test) was distinguishable from the other four. However, the dry time-point of a fabric measured with the gravimetric method did not coincide with the drying time measured with the infrared test or perceived by human subjects.
FangerPO. Assessment of mans thermal comfort in practice. Br J Ind Med1973; 30: 313–324.
2.
GreenBG. Temperature perception and nociception. J Neuro Sci2004; 61: 13–29.
3.
HenselH. Thermoreception and temperature regulation. London, UK: Academic Press, 1981.
4.
HenselH. Physiologie der Thermoreception. Ergebn Physiol1952; 47: 166–368.
5.
LiY. Perceptions of temperature, moisture and comfort in clothing during environmental transients. Ergonomics2005; 48: 234–248.
6.
WongASWLiYNewtonE. Mathematical simulation of human psychological perception of moisture sensation. In: ZengXLiYRuanDKoehlL (eds) Computational Textile Studies in Computational Intelligence. Vol. 55, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2007, pp. 265–273.
7.
LiY. The science of clothing comfort. Manchester, UK: The Textile Institute, 2001.
8.
WinslowCEAHerringtonLPGaggeAP. Physiological reactions and sensations of pleasantness under varying atmospheric conditions. ASHVE Trans1939; 44: 179–194.
9.
FukazawaTHavenithG. Differences in comfort perception in relation to local and whole body skin wettedness. Eur J Appl Physiol2009; 106: 15–24.
10.
GaggeAP. A new physiological variable associated with sensible and insensible perspiration. Am J Physiol1937; 120: 277–287.
11.
PlanteAMHolcombeBVStephensLG. Fiber hygroscopicity and perceptions of dampness. 1. Subjective trials. Textile Res J1995; 65: 293–298.
12.
LiYPlanteAMHolcombeBV. Fiber hygroscopicity and perceptions of dampness. 2. Physical-mechanisms. Textile Res J1995; 65: 316–324.
13.
SweeneyMMBransonDH. Sensory Comfort. 1. A Psychophysical method for assessing moisture sensation in clothing. Textile Res J1990; 60: 371–377.
14.
KarFFanJYuWWanX. Effects of thermal and moisture transport properties of t-shirts on wearer's comfort sensations. Fiber Polym2007; 8: 537–542.
15.
FanJTsangHWK. Effect of clothing thermal properties on the thermal comfort sensation during active sports. Textile Res J2008; 78: 111–118.
16.
PrestonJMChenJC. Some aspects of the drying and heating of textiles. 1. The moisture in fabrics. J Soc Dyers Colourists1946; 62: 361–364.
17.
BuissonYLRajasekaranKFrenchADConradDCRoyPS. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of cotton fabric damage by tumble drying. Textile Res J2000; 70: 739–743.
18.
CrowRMGillespiTJSlaterK. Drying of textile fabrics: 2. Relationship between air-moisture content and fabric temperature. J Textile Inst1974; 65: 82–86.
19.
NgABDengSM. A new termination control method for a clothes drying process in a clothes dryer. Appl Energy2008; 85: 818–829.
20.
FangueiroRFilgueirasASoutinhoFXieMD. Wicking behavior and drying capability of functional knitted fabrics. Textile Res J2010; 80: 1522–1530.
21.
HavenithGRichardsMGWangXX. Apparent latent heat of evaporation from clothing: Attenuation and 'heat pipe' effects. J Appl Physiol2008; 104: 142–149.
22.
RichardsMGMRossiRMeinanderH. Dry and wet heat transfer through clothing dependent on the clothing properties under cold conditions. Int J Occup Saf Ergon2008; 14: 69–76.
23.
ZhangHHuizengaCArensEWangD. Thermal sensation and comfort in transient non-uniform thermalenvironments. European J Appl Physiol2004; 92: 728–733.
24.
ArensEZhangHHuizengaC. Partial- and whole-body thermal sensation and comfort – Part II: Non-uniform environmental conditions. J Therm Biol2006; 31: 60–66.
25.
ZhangHArensEKimDBuchbergerEBaumanFHuizengaC. Comfort, perceived air quality, and work performance in a low-power task-ambient conditioning system. Build Environ2010; 45: 29–39.
26.
WangDZhangHArensEHuizengaC. Observations of upper-extremity skin temperature and corresponding overall-body thermal sensations and comfort. Building and Environment2007; 42: 3933–3943.
Schleimann-JensenAForsbergK. New test method for determination of emissivity and reflection properties of protective material exposed to radiant heat. In: BarkerRLColettaGC (eds) Performance of protective clothing, a symposium. Raleigh, NC, USA: ASTM, 1986, pp. 376–386.
29.
CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics: A ready-reference book of chemical and physical data, 73 ed. Cleveland, USA: Chemical Rubber Co, 1993.
30.
MancaDRovaglioM. Infrared thermographic image processing for the operation and control of heterogeneous combustion chambers. Combust Flame2002; 130: 277–297.
31.
ParsonsK. Human thermal environments. London: Taylor and Francis, 2003.
32.
ArensEZhangHHuizengaC. Partial- and whole-body thermal sensation and comfort, Part I: Uniform environmental conditions. J Thermal Biol2006; 31: 53–59.
33.
WilliamsonAHoggartB. Pain: A review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clinical Nursing2005; 14: 798–804.
34.
HesL. The effect of underwear on thermal contact feeling caused by dressing up and wearing of garments. Tecnitex 2001 Autex Conference2001.
35.
StevensJC. Temperature and the two-point threshold. Somatosens Mot Res1989; 6: 275–284.
