The relationship between friction and the tactile properties of woven and knitted fabrics was investigated. Coefficients of friction for the fabrics were measured using two devices: a previously developed Textile Friction Analyzer and the Kawabata Evaluation System FB4. The tactile properties of the fabrics were evaluated by a panel, which assessed the roughness and the prickle of textile surfaces in two different blind subjective tests. Correlation between fabric friction and subjectively perceived touch properties was found for knitted, but not for woven fabrics. In order to find out if additional parameters could have influenced the obtained relationship, textile properties such as bending, compression, basis weight, hairiness and fabric thickness were investigated. Using principal component analysis, we found that the relevant properties in the relationship between friction and the touch properties of fabrics were bending, thickness and compressibility. On the other hand, the friction results showed a lack of commonality between the friction analyzer and the Kawabata surface tester, although there seemed to be a negative correlation between the two apparatus. This was attributed to the different testing conditions such as applied load, sliding speed, contact area and material surfaces and illustrated the dependence of fabric friction properties on testing variables
Barker, R.L. , From Fabric Hand to Thermal Comfort: The evolving Role of Objective Measurements in Explaining Human Comfort Response to Textiles , Int. J. Clothing Sci. Technol., 14(3/4), 181—200 ( 2002).
2.
Li, Y., “ The Science of Clothing Comfort. Textile Progress,” J. M. Layton, Ed., The Textile Institute , Manchester, Vol. 31, p. 138, 2001 .
3.
Gee, M.G., Tomlins, P., Calver, A., Darling, R.H., and Rides, M., A new friction measurement system for the frictional component of touch, Wear, 259(7—12), 1437—1442 (2005).
4.
Birley, A.W., Haworth, B., and Batchelor, J., “ Physics of Plastics” Hanser, Munich, 1992.
5.
Moore, D.F., “ The Friction and Lubrication of Elastomers,” Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1972.
6.
Ramkumar, S.S. , Rajanala, R., and Parameswaran , S., Frictional Characterization of Polymeric Materials — A Review, AATCC Review,5(2), 17—20 (2005).
7.
Ramkumar, S.S. , Rajanala, R., Parmeswaran, S., Paige, R., Shaw, A., Shelly, D.C., Anderson, T.A., Cobb, G.P., Mahmud, R., Roedel, C., and Tock, R.W., Experimental Verification of Failure of Amonton's Law in Polymeric Textiles, J. Appl. Sci., 91, 3879—3885 (2004).
Hermann, D., Ramkumar, S.S., Seshaiyer, P., and Parameswaran, S. , Frictional Study of Woven Fabrics: the Relationship between the Friction and Velocity of Testing, J. Appl. Sci. , 92(4), 2420—2424 ( 2004).
10.
Ramkumar, S.S. , Umrani, A.S., Shelly, D.C., Tock, R.W., Parameswaran , S., and Smith, M.L., Study of the Effect of Sliding Velocity on the Frictional Properties of Nonwoven Fabric Substrates, Wear, 256(3—4), 221—225 ( 2004).
11.
Bueno, M.A. and Renner, M., De l'Etoffe à la Main. Pour laScience, 266, 144—149 (1999).
12.
Lederman, S.J., “ Skin and Touch: Encyclopedia of Human Biology” 2nd edn, Vol. 8, Academic Press , San Diego, 1997.
13.
Connor, C.E. , Hsiao, S.S., Phillips, J.R., and Johnson, K.O., Tactile Roughness : Neural Codes that Account for Psychophysical Magnitude Estimates, J. Neurosci., 10, 3823—3836 (1990).
14.
Jiang, W., Tremblay, F., and Chapman, C.E., Neural Encoding of Texture Changes in the Primary and the Secondary Cortical Areas of Monkeys During Passive Texture Discrimination, J. Neurophysiol., 77(3), 1656—1662 (1997).
15.
Dillon, P., Moody, W., Bartlett, R., Scully, P., Morgan, R., and James, C., “ Sensing the Fabric,” John Moores University, Liverpool, 2000.
16.
Garnsworthy, R.K., Gully, R.L., Kandiah, R.P., Kenins, P., Mayfield, R.J., and Westerman , R.A., Understanding the Causes od Prickle and Itch from the Skin Contact of Fabrics, Report No G64, Australasian Textiles, 8(4): 26—29 (1988).
17.
Chen, Y., Turner, B., and Zhao, T., A. NewComputerized Data Acquisition and Analysis System for KES-FB Instruments, Textile Res. J., 71(9), 767—770 (2001).
18.
Kawabata, S., “ The Standardization and Analysis of Hand Evaluation” Osaka Tiger Printing Co., Osaka, 1980.
19.
Grineviciute, D. and Gutauskas, M.The Comparison of Methods for the Evaluation of Woven Fabric Hand, Mater. Sci., 10(1), 97—100 (2004).
20.
Lederman, S.J. , Klatzky, R.L., Hamilton, C.L., and Ramsay, G.I., Perceiving Roughness Via a Rigid Probe: Psychophysical Effects of Exploration Speed and Move of Touch, http:/www.haptics-e.org.
21.
Fontaine, S. , Marsiquet, C., Renner, M., and Bueno, M.A., Characterization of Roughness-Friction: Example with Nonwovens, Textile Res. J., 75(12), 826—832 (2005).
22.
Wolfram, L.J. , Friction of Skin, J. Soc. Cosmetic Chemists, 34, 465—476 (1983).
23.
Ramkumar, S.S. , Wood, D.J., and Harlock, S.C., Developing a Polymeric Human Finger Sensor to Study the Frictional Properties of Textiles — Part I: Artificial Finger Development, Textile Res. J., 73(6), 469—473 (2003).
24.
Ramkumar, S.S. , Wood, D.J., and Harlock, S.C., Developing a Polymeric Human Finger Sensor to Study the Frictional Properties of Textiles — Part II: Experimental Results, Textile Res. J., 73(7), 606—610 (2003).
25.
Grineviciute, D., Gutauskas, M., and Daukantiene , V., Textile Hand: Comparison of Two Evaluation Methods , Mater. Sci., 11(1), 57—63 (2005).
Ampuero, J., and Derler, S.Skin Friction Management, An Emerging Apparel and Textile Science. In: Proceedings of Avantex, Messe Frankfurt , 1—8 (2002).
28.
Hui, C.L., Lau, T.W., Ng, S.F., and Chan, K .C. C. , Neural Network of human Psychological Perceptions of Fabrics Hand, Textile Res. J., 74(5), 375—383 (2004).
29.
Afnor, “Textiles — Domestics Washing and Drying Procedures for Textile Testing,” ENISO6330, 2000.
30.
Derler, S., Huber, R., and Schrade, U., Charakterisierung der Reibung von Textilien, in Proc. 40th International Man-Made Fibres Congress, Dornbirn , Austria, 2001.
31.
bfuR9729, Prüfreglement R 9729 für Bodenbeläge mit erhöhter Gleitfestigkeit . Bern, 2001.
32.
Gunn, Reibungswert von Socken reduzieren. Melliand Textilberichte,9, 711 (1999).
33.
Afnor, “ Sensory Analysis — General Guidance for Sensory Evaluation — Description, Differentiation and Hedonic Measurement”, XPV09-501, 1999.
34.
Kuschefski, A., Zur Validität von Reibzahlen als Bewertungskriterien der Gleitsicherheit, Wuppertal, 1983.
35.
Ramkumar, S.S., “ A Study of the Handle Characteristics of 1 × 1 Rib Cotton Weft Knitted Fabrics ”, University of Leeds, England , 1998.
