Abstract
The fatigue behavior of technical polyamide 66 fibers is studied using two samples with different diameters. First, the structural and viscoelastic properties are characterized, and then loading criteria for fatigue failure are identified. The fatigue fracture morphology revealed by scanning electron microscopy is quite different from simple tensile fracture morphology. Many theories have been advanced to explain the fatigue failure phenomenon. This work shows that fatigue failure is initiated at the surface of the fiber and not in the interior, as some using the Prevorsek model have suggested. On the other hand, fatigue failure is independent of fiber geometry, and a relaxation thermal treatment considerably reduces fatigue.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
