BaldwinA. (1978). The Baldwin identification matrix. Educational planning for the gifted. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 161 173].
2.
BaronaA., & GarciaE. (Eds.). (1990). Children at risk: Poverty, minority status, and other issues in educational equity. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 353 491].
3.
BernalE. (1979). The education of the culturally different gifted. The gifted and talented: Their education and development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.*
4.
ClarkB. (1983). Growing up gifted. Columbus, OH: Merrill.*
5.
De LeonJ., & Argus-CalvoB. (1997), A model program for identifying culturally and linguistically diverse rural gifted and talented students. Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State University, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406 125).
6.
Framework for meeting the needs of TAG students. (1996). Portland, OR: Portland School District. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 412 667).
7.
GallagherJ. J. (1966). Research summary on gifted child education. Springfield, IL: Department of Public Instruction. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 026 753].
8.
Gifted and talented—principles of identification. (1997, September 22). [on-line] Available on the Internet: http://www.eddept.wa.edu.
9.
HerringR. D. (1996). The unrecognized gifted: A more humanistic perspective for indigenous students. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 35(1), 4–11.
10.
RichenE. S. (1985). Identification of gifted students: An update. Roeper Review, 8(2), 68–72.
11.
RosenfieldS. (1983). Assessment of the gifted child. In KratochwillT. R. (Vol. Ed.)., Advances in school psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1–60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
ThomasA. & CrimesJ., (Eds.). (1985). Best practices in school psychology, 143–155. Washington, D.C.: National Association of School Psychologists.*
