AlexanderP. A.ShallertD. L., & HareV. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61, 315–343.
2.
BloomB. S.EngelhartM. D.FurstE. J.HillW. H., & KrathwohlD. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
3.
Council for Basic Education. (1996). Judging standards in education reform. Washington, DC: Author.
4.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (1998, August). Key state policies on K-12 education: Content standards, graduation requirements, teacher licensure, time and attendance, students assessment: A 50 state report. Washington, DC: Author.
5.
Council of Great City Schools. (1996). Becoming the best: Standards and assessment development in the great city schools. Washington, DC: Council of Great City Schools.
GandalM. (1996). Making standards matter 1996: An annual fifty-state report on efforts to raise academic standards. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
8.
Goals2000: Educate America Act. (1994). P.L. No. 103–227, 103rd Congress.
9.
GoertzM., & FriedmanD. (1996, March). State education reform and students with disabilities: A preliminary analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Consortium of Policy Research in Education and Center for Policy Research on the Impact of General and Special Education Reform.
10.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997. (1997). P.L. No. 105–17.
11.
KameenuiE., & SimmonsD. (1990). Designing instructional strategies: The prevention of academic learning problems. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
12.
McDonnellL. M.McLaughlinM. J., & MorrisonP. (1997). Educating one and all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
13.
McLaughlinM. J.HendersonK., & RhimL. M. (1998, September). Snapshots of reform: How five local districts are interpreting standards based reform for students with disabilities. Alexandria, VA: Center for Policy Research on the Impact of General and Special Education Reform.
14.
McLaughlinM. W., & ShepardL. A. with O?DayJ. A., 1995. Improving education through standards-based reform: A report by the National Academy of Education Panel on Standards-Based Reform. Stanford, CA: National Academy of Education.
15.
NoletV. W., & TindalG. (1994). Instruction and learning in middle school science classes: Implications for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 28, 166–187.
16.
NoletV. W., & TindalG. R. (1996). Curriculum-based collaboration. In MeyenE. L.VergasonG. A., & WhelanR. J. (Eds.), Strategies for teaching exceptional children in inclusive settings (pp. 81–99). Denver, CO: Love.
17.
Quality Counts. (1997, January 22). A report card on the condition of public education in 50 states. Education Week supplement.
18.
SmithM., & O?DayJ. (1991). Systemic school reform. In FurhrmanS. & MalenB. (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233–268). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.