BursuckW.PollowayE. A.PlanteL.EpsteinM. H.JayanthiM., & McConeghyJ. (1996). Report card grading and adaptations: A national survey of classroom practices. Exceptional Children, 62, 301–318.
2.
CarpenterD. (1985). Grading handicapped pupils: Review and position statement, Remedial and Special Education, 6(4), 54–59.
3.
CarpenterD.GranthamL. B., & HardisterM. P. (1983). Grading mainstreamed handicapped pupils: What are the issues?Journal of Special Education, 17(2), 183–188.
4.
CohenS. B. (1982). Assigning report card grades to the mainstreamed child. TEACHING Exceptional Children. 15, 86–89.
5.
ColeC. M. (1992). Collaboration: Research and practice (CASE Information Dissemination Packet). Indiana University: Smith Research Center, School of Education. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 358 653].
6.
DavisW. E. (1982). The resource teachers role as tutor and responsibilities for pupil grading. Journal for Special Educators, 19(1), 55–58.
7.
DruckerH., & HansenB. C. (1982). Grading the mainstreamed handicapped: Issues and suggestions for the regular social studies classroom teacher. The Social Studies Teacher, 73(6), 250–251.
8.
Federal Register. (1987). 300.346, 102.72.
9.
FisherR., & UryW. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Books.*
10.
FriendM., & CookL. (1996). Interactions: Collaboration for school professionals (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.*
11.
KiralyJ.Jr., & BedellJ. J. (1984). Grading the mainstreamed handicapped student. NASSP Bulletin, 68, 111–115.
12.
PollowayE. A.EpsteinM. H.BursuckW. D.RoderiqueT. W.McConeghyJ. L.JayanthiM. (1994). Classroom grading: A national survey of policies. Remedial and Special Education, 15(3), 162–170.
RojewskiJ. W.PollardR. R., & MeersG. D. (1990). Grading mainstreamed special needs students: Determining practices and attitudes of secondary vocational educators using a qualitative approach. Remedial and Special Education, 12(1), 7–15, 28.
15.
RojewskiJ. W.PollardR. R., & MeersG. D. (1992). Grading secondary vocational education students with disabilities: A national perspective. Exceptional Children, 59, 68–76.
16.
StruykL. R.EpsteinM. H.BursuckW.PollowayE. A.McConeghyJ., & ColeK. E. (1995). Homework, grading, and testing practices used by teachers for students with and without disabilities. Clearing House, 69(1), 50–55.
17.
TerwilligerJ. S. (1977). Assigning grades Philosophical issues and practical recommendations. Journal of Research and Development in Education. 10(3), 21–39.
18.
UryW. (1991). Getting past no: Negotiating with difficult people. New York: Penguin Books.
19.
VasaS. F. (1981). Alternative procedures for grading handicapped students in the secondary schools. Education Unlimited. 3(1).