Grading Modified Assignments

Bailey J. , & McTighe J. (1996). Reporting achievement at the secondary level: What and how. In Guskey T. R. (Ed.), ASCD 1996 Yearbook: Communicating student learning (pp. 119–140). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Boyer M. M. (1996, November). Tips for differentiating instruction in the classroom: Strategies for modifying and adapting curriculum to meet the needs of all students. Workshop presented to the Kyrene Elementary School District, Kyrene, AZ.

Bursuck W. Polloway E. A. Plante L. Epstein M. Jayanthi M. , & McConeghy J. (1996). Report card grading and adaptations: A national survey of classroom practices. Exceptional Children, 62, 301–318.

Carpenter D. (1985). Grading handicapped pupils: Review and position statement. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 54–59.

Collins A. , & Dana T. (1993). Using portfolios with middle grades students. Middle School Journal. 25, 15–19.

Donahue K. , & Zigmond N. (1990). Academic grades of ninth-grade urban learning disabled students and low-achieving peers. Exceptionality, 1, 17–27.

Friend M. , & Bursuck W. D. (1996). Including students with special needs: A practical guide for teachers. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.*

Gersten R. Vaughn S. , & Brengleman S. U. (1996). Academic feedback for special education students and students with learning difficulties. In Guskey T. R. (Ed.), ASCD 1996 Yearbook: Communicating student learning (pp. 47–57). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Guskey T. R. (1996). Reporting on student learning: Lessons from the past Prescriptions for the future. In Guskey T. R. (Ed.), ASCD 1996 Yearbook: Communicating student learning (pp. 13–24). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

King-Sears M. E. (1994). Curriculum-based assessment in special education. San Diego: Singular.*

King-Sears M. E. (1997). Assessment. In Bradley D. F. King-Sears M. E. , & Switlick D. M. (Eds.), Teaching students in inclusive settings: From theory to practice (pp. 129–167). Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.*

Making assessment meaningful: Rubrics clarify expectations, yield better feedback. (1994). ASCD Update, 36(6), 1–5.

Ornstein A. C. (1994). Grading practices and policies: An overview and some suggestions. NASSP Bulletin, 78(561), 55–64.

Polloway E. A. Epstein M. H. Bursuck W. D. Roderique T. W. McConeghy J. , & Jayanthi M. (1994). Classroom grading: A national survey of policies. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 162–170.

Rojewski J. W. Pollard R. R. , & Meers G. D. (1990). Grading mainstreamed special needs students: Determining practices and attitudes of secondary vocational educators using a qualitative approach. Remedial and Special Education, 12, 7–16.

Schulz J. B. , & Carpenter C. D. (1994). Mainstreaming exceptional students: A guide for classoom teachers (4th ed.). Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.*

Schumm J. S. , & Vaughn S. (1991). Making adaptations for mainstreamed students: General classroom teachers perspectives. Remedial and Special Education. 12(4), 18–27.

Valdes K. A. Williamson C. L. , & Wagner M. M. (1990). The national longitudinal transition study of special education students (Vol. 1). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 324 893].

Wiggins G. (1996). Honesty and fairness: Toward better grading and reporting. In Guskey T. R. (Ed.), ASCD 1996 Yearbook: Communicating student learning (pp. 141–177). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Wood J. (1984). Adapting instruction for the mainstream. New York: Merrill.*