AlgozzineB. (1993, September). Including students with disabilities in systemic efforts to measure outcomes: Why ask why? In YsseldykeJ. E. & ThurlowM. L. (Eds.), Views on inclusion and testing accommodations for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report #7). Minneapolis: National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 366 164].
2.
ElliottS. N., & KratochwillT. R. (1995–1998). Performance assessment and students with disabilities: Psychometric issues, accommodation procedures, and outcome analyses. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, and U.S. Department of Education.*
3.
ElliottS. N., & KratochwillT. R. (1998). Experimental analysis of the effects of testing accommodations on the scores of students with disabilities (3- Year Study: 1998–2000). Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, and U.S. Department of Education.*
4.
ElliottS. N.KratochwillT. R., & GilbertsonA. (1998). The assessment accommodation checklist. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.*
5.
McDonnellL. M.McLaughlinM. J., & MorisonP. (Eds.). (1997). Educating one and all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 409 677].
6.
DayO.A.J., & SmithM. S. (1993). Systemic reform and educational opportunity. In FurhmanS. (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy (pp. 250–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 359 626].
7.
ReynoldsM. C. (1993). Inclusion and accommodation in assessment at the margins. In YsseldykeJ. E. & ThurlowM. L. (Eds.), Views on inclusion and testing accommodations for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report #7) (pp. 47–64). Minneapolis: National Center on Education Outcomes, University of Minnesota. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 366 164].
8.
SchulteA. A. (1997). Educators use and evaluation of the Assessment Accommodation Checklist for students with disabilities. Unpublished master s thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.*
9.
ShrinerJ. G.SpandeG. E., & ThurlowM. L. (1994). Slate special education outcomes 1993. Minneapolis: National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 372 558].
10.
ThurlowM. L.ScottD. L., & YsseldykeJ. E. (1995). A compilation of states guidelines for accommodations in assessments for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report #18). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 385 058).
11.
ThurlowM. L.YsseldykeJ. E., & SilversteinB. (1995). Testing accommodations for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 16(5), 260–270.
12.
U.S. Department of Education. (1997). Results for students with disabilities (93–112). 17 Annual Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Author. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 386 018].
13.
WildemuthB. N. (1983). Minimum competency testing and the handicapped. Princeton, NJ: ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 289 886].